Financial intermediation and growth: causality and causes
Do better functioning financial intermediaries -financial intermediaries that are better at ameliorating information asymmetrics and facilitating transactions- exert a causal influence on economic growth? Providing evidence on causality has implications for policymakers and economists. For instance,...
Guardado en:
| Autores principales: | , , |
|---|---|
| Formato: | Artículo |
| Lenguaje: | eng |
| Publicado: |
Banco Central de Chile
2019
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12580/3637 |
| Etiquetas: |
Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
|
| Sumario: | Do better functioning financial intermediaries -financial intermediaries that are better at ameliorating information asymmetrics and facilitating transactions- exert a causal influence on economic growth? Providing evidence on causality has implications for policymakers and economists. For instance, Alexander Hamilton (1781) argued tha 'banks were the happiest engines that ever were invented' for spurring economic growth. Others, however, question whether finance boots growth. President John Adams (1819) asserted that banks harm the 'morality, tranquility, and even wealth' of nations. Economic theories mirror these divisions. Some models show that economic agents create debt contracts and financial intermediaries to ameliorate the economoc consequences of informational asymmetries, with beneficial implications for resource allocation and economic activity. |
|---|