Fifteen years of new growth economics: what have we learned?
Paul Romer’s paper, “Increasing Returns and Long-Run Growth,” is now fifteen years old. This pathbreaking contribution led to a resurgence in research on economic growth. The resulting literature has in had a number of important impacts. In particular, it shifted the research focus of macroeconomist...
Guardado en:
| Autor principal: | |
|---|---|
| Formato: | Artículo |
| Lenguaje: | eng |
| Publicado: |
Banco Central de Chile
2019
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12580/3680 |
| Etiquetas: |
Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
|
| Sumario: | Paul Romer’s paper, “Increasing Returns and Long-Run Growth,” is now fifteen years old. This pathbreaking contribution led to a resurgence in research on economic growth. The resulting literature has in had a number of important impacts. In particular, it shifted the research focus of macroeconomists. From the time when Lucas, Barro, Prescott, and Sargent led the rational expectations revolution until Romer, Barro, and Lucas started the new literature on economic growth, macroeconomists devoted virtually no effort to the study of long-run issues, they were all doing research on business cycle theory. In this sense, the new growth theory represented a step in the right direction. |
|---|