Veinte años de formación permanente del profesorado, investigación-acción y programación por dominios de acción motriz
The aim of this paper is to revise the experience of a group of teachers that spent twenty years developing Action Research (AR) dynamics, and analyze how it influenced their professional development and the improvement of the quality of their teaching. In the past ten years the group has organized...
Guardado en:
| Autor principal: | |
|---|---|
| Formato: | text (article) |
| Lenguaje: | spa |
| Publicado: |
2016
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/oaiart?codigo=5400882 |
| Etiquetas: |
Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
|
| Sumario: | The aim of this paper is to revise the experience of a group of teachers that spent twenty years developing Action Research (AR) dynamics,
and analyze how it influenced their professional development and the improvement of the quality of their teaching. In the past ten years the group
has organized its programming in Primary physical education based on «Action domain of motor skills», with the understanding that, currently, it is
the best way to structure their learning contents. The working methodology is based on a succession of AR spirals and cycles, and in different qualitative
tools of data collection, particularly through the communicative discussion group. The results show the different AR phases and spirals the group has
gone through in these 20 years and the current practice group structure. This article also includes an analysis of the main lessons, in terms of strengths
and weaknesses, learned during this time: (a) the involvement in AR working groups meant a strong encouragement and support in teaching
professional development; (B) it also seemed to be an important element in the enhancement of the quality of the teaching practice of the teacher
involved in the project, as well as a strong support to solve the problems that arise in educational practice; (C) in addition, it promoted teaching
development and improved the quality of education in the field of PE. To end, we address some reflections and conclusions about the implications of
sustaing a working group of this nature for this long |
|---|