Lenguajes, públicos y apropiación de ciencia escrita
The study characterizes the written science to clarify the languages and audiences that deploying and to establish whether such audiences appropriated science through written language. The descriptive method that allowed to specify to specify the components and functions of written communication of...
Guardado en:
| Autor principal: | |
|---|---|
| Formato: | text (article) |
| Lenguaje: | spa |
| Publicado: |
2016
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/oaiart?codigo=5403291 |
| Etiquetas: |
Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
|
| id |
oai-ART0000930997 |
|---|---|
| record_format |
dspace |
| institution |
DialNet |
| collection |
DialNet |
| language |
spa |
| topic |
writing science audiences standardization appropriation divulgation |
| spellingShingle |
writing science audiences standardization appropriation divulgation Giraldo Giraldo, Camilo Lenguajes, públicos y apropiación de ciencia escrita |
| description |
The study characterizes the written science to clarify the languages and audiences that deploying and to establish whether such audiences appropriated science through written language. The descriptive method that allowed to specify to specify the components and functions of written communication of science that was used. From this, it was investigated by the written languages (private and open) according to the audiences they target. Then he sought it to determine the appropriation of science in every public. The study showed the tendency to standardization of a written language between specialists. The paper is the document model of such standardization. It was also found a speech decanting for education and other suitable for the general public. The appropriation of science through the writing is possibl in so far as working with written language. In addition, the synonymy between science popularization and science education among science popularization and science journalism was evident erratic. It conclude that science is a matter of written language. The goal of neutrality for the scientific language is maintained, despite criticism by positivists features in which it sits. |
| format |
text (article) |
| author |
Giraldo Giraldo, Camilo |
| author_facet |
Giraldo Giraldo, Camilo |
| author_sort |
Giraldo Giraldo, Camilo |
| title |
Lenguajes, públicos y apropiación de ciencia escrita |
| title_short |
Lenguajes, públicos y apropiación de ciencia escrita |
| title_full |
Lenguajes, públicos y apropiación de ciencia escrita |
| title_fullStr |
Lenguajes, públicos y apropiación de ciencia escrita |
| title_full_unstemmed |
Lenguajes, públicos y apropiación de ciencia escrita |
| title_sort |
lenguajes, públicos y apropiación de ciencia escrita |
| publishDate |
2016 |
| url |
https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/oaiart?codigo=5403291 |
| work_keys_str_mv |
AT giraldogiraldocamilo lenguajespublicosyapropiaciondecienciaescrita |
| _version_ |
1718333874964004864 |
| spelling |
oai-ART00009309972016-04-10Lenguajes, públicos y apropiación de ciencia escritaGiraldo Giraldo, CamilowritingscienceaudiencesstandardizationappropriationdivulgationThe study characterizes the written science to clarify the languages and audiences that deploying and to establish whether such audiences appropriated science through written language. The descriptive method that allowed to specify to specify the components and functions of written communication of science that was used. From this, it was investigated by the written languages (private and open) according to the audiences they target. Then he sought it to determine the appropriation of science in every public. The study showed the tendency to standardization of a written language between specialists. The paper is the document model of such standardization. It was also found a speech decanting for education and other suitable for the general public. The appropriation of science through the writing is possibl in so far as working with written language. In addition, the synonymy between science popularization and science education among science popularization and science journalism was evident erratic. It conclude that science is a matter of written language. The goal of neutrality for the scientific language is maintained, despite criticism by positivists features in which it sits.El estudio caracteriza la escritura de la ciencia para clarificar los lenguajes y los públicos que despliega y establecer si tales audiencias apropian la ciencia por medio de lenguaje escrito. Se utilizó el método descriptivo que permitió especificar los componentes y funciones de la comunicación escrita de la ciencia. A partir de ello, se indagó por los lenguajes escritos (privados y abiertos) de acuerdo con los públicos a los que se dirigen. Luego, se buscó determinar la apropiación de ciencia en cada público. El estudio evidenció la tendencia a la estandarización de un lenguaje escrito entre especialistas; el Artículo Científico es el documento modelo de esa normalización. También se halló un discurso decantado para la educación y otro adecuado para el público general. La apropiación de la ciencia a través de la escritura es posible en la medida en que se trabaja con el lenguaje escrito. Además, se evidenció errática la sinonimia entre 'Divulgación científica' con 'Enseñanza de la ciencia' y entre 'Divulgación científica' y 'Periodismo Científico'. Se concluye que la ciencia es cuestión de lenguaje escrito. La meta de neutralidad para el lenguaje científico se mantiene, pese a las críticas por los rasgos positivistas en los que se asienta.2016text (article)https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/oaiart?codigo=5403291(Revista) ISSN 2174-1859Index.comunicación: Revista científica en el ámbito de la Comunicación Aplicada, ISSN 2174-1859, Vol. 6, Nº. 1, 2016 (Ejemplar dedicado a: Número anual ordinario), pags. 53-76spaLICENCIA DE USO: Los documentos a texto completo incluidos en Dialnet son de acceso libre y propiedad de sus autores y/o editores. Por tanto, cualquier acto de reproducción, distribución, comunicación pública y/o transformación total o parcial requiere el consentimiento expreso y escrito de aquéllos. Cualquier enlace al texto completo de estos documentos deberá hacerse a través de la URL oficial de éstos en Dialnet. Más información: https://dialnet.unirioja.es/info/derechosOAI | INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS STATEMENT: Full text documents hosted by Dialnet are protected by copyright and/or related rights. This digital object is accessible without charge, but its use is subject to the licensing conditions set by its authors or editors. Unless expressly stated otherwise in the licensing conditions, you are free to linking, browsing, printing and making a copy for your own personal purposes. All other acts of reproduction and communication to the public are subject to the licensing conditions expressed by editors and authors and require consent from them. Any link to this document should be made using its official URL in Dialnet. More info: https://dialnet.unirioja.es/info/derechosOAI |