Jueces, derechos fundamentales y relaciones entre particulares
Several questions are approached in this thesis: the problem of the efficacy of the constitutional rights in the relationship between individuals (Drittwirkung), the evolution of ground rights, their concept and their effect on the Bill of fundamental rights of the Treaty which establishes a Constit...
Guardado en:
| Autor principal: | |
|---|---|
| Otros Autores: | |
| Formato: | text (thesis) |
| Lenguaje: | spa |
| Publicado: |
Universidad de Sevilla (España)
2006
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/oaites?codigo=1407 |
| Etiquetas: |
Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
|
| Sumario: | Several questions are approached in this thesis: the problem of the efficacy of the constitutional rights in the relationship between individuals (Drittwirkung), the evolution of ground rights, their concept and their effect on the Bill of fundamental rights of the Treaty which establishes a Constitution for Europe, the various theories about the horizontal efficacy of the fundamental rights (direct efficacy, indirect efficacy and fundamental rights as duties of protection) and the criticism of these theories and their interrelationship, the approaching of this subject in several countries, from Germany, where the theory was born, to South America or South Africa, the theory of the "state action" in the United States of America, and the treatment of the subject in the supranational European space. Also is treated the subject of the normative character of the Constitution, the reaction against the degradation of the statute law and the vindication of the legislative development in opposition to the direct applicability of the Constitution, because the "Drittwirkung" is considered the "last border" of the normative Constitution. Is treated in detail the protection of constitutional rights in private relationships by the ordinary courts and the Constitutional Court, the alteration of the balance between powers and the risk of fomenting a model of judge unbound to the "rule of law", its interrelation with the normative character of the Constitution, the value of the "minimum content" in the protection of such fundamental rights when they are not yet legislatively developed, the game of the judgment of proportionality in this matter and the need of a suitable boundary of them when they spread their effectiveness in these relationships. |
|---|