THE CRISIS AND THE AXIOLOGICAL SILENCE OF THE INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS DISCIPLINE

Even though International Relations discipline (IR) is in its centennial history, one of the contemporary discussion in IR is concerning whether IR is a real discipline or not. By referencing the current discussions regarding the existence and character of the discipline, this study argues that disc...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal:	Erdem ÖZLÜK
Formato:	article
Lenguaje:	DE EN FR TR
Publicado:	Fırat University 2019
Materias:	international relations axiology epistemology ontology Social Sciences H Social sciences (General) H1-99
Acceso en línea:	https://doaj.org/article/001a375b5f9b49719ab9729bba57a586
Etiquetas:	Agregar Etiqueta Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!

id	oai:doaj.org-article:001a375b5f9b49719ab9729bba57a586
record_format	dspace
spelling	oai:doaj.org-article:001a375b5f9b49719ab9729bba57a5862021-11-24T09:20:51ZTHE CRISIS AND THE AXIOLOGICAL SILENCE OF THE INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS DISCIPLINE2148-416310.9761/JASSS3379https://doaj.org/article/001a375b5f9b49719ab9729bba57a5862019-08-01T00:00:00Zhttps://jasstudies.com/index.jsp?mod=tammetin&makaleadi=758087773_7-Yrd.%20Do%C3%A7.%20Dr.%20Erdem%20%C3%96ZL%C3%9CK.pdf&key=27827https://doaj.org/toc/2148-4163Even though International Relations discipline (IR) is in its centennial history, one of the contemporary discussion in IR is concerning whether IR is a real discipline or not. By referencing the current discussions regarding the existence and character of the discipline, this study argues that discussions arise from neglected axiological foundations of the discipline rather than mostly referenced ontological or epistemological foundations of the discipline. Therefore, any discussions concerning the discipline’s today should not be analyzed without emphasizing the axiological foundations that has formed discipline. It is easy to find new ways and new trends by re-reading the values which formed the ontological and epistemological foundations of the discipline. Firstly, this study deals with IR’s current the ontological, epistemological and methodological crisis and whether there is a real crisis in IR or not will be also questioned. Secondly, the meaning of the axiology and why axiology is important for the discipline is also dealt with. Finally, why IR has been silent about the axiology is also discussed.Erdem ÖZLÜKFırat Universityarticleinternational relationsaxiologyepistemologyontologySocial SciencesHSocial sciences (General)H1-99DEENFRTRJournal of Academic Social Science Studies , Vol 9, Iss 44, Pp 91-106 (2019)
institution	DOAJ
collection	DOAJ
language	DE EN FR TR
topic	international relations axiology epistemology ontology Social Sciences H Social sciences (General) H1-99
spellingShingle	international relations axiology epistemology ontology Social Sciences H Social sciences (General) H1-99 Erdem ÖZLÜK THE CRISIS AND THE AXIOLOGICAL SILENCE OF THE INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS DISCIPLINE
description	Even though International Relations discipline (IR) is in its centennial history, one of the contemporary discussion in IR is concerning whether IR is a real discipline or not. By referencing the current discussions regarding the existence and character of the discipline, this study argues that discussions arise from neglected axiological foundations of the discipline rather than mostly referenced ontological or epistemological foundations of the discipline. Therefore, any discussions concerning the discipline’s today should not be analyzed without emphasizing the axiological foundations that has formed discipline. It is easy to find new ways and new trends by re-reading the values which formed the ontological and epistemological foundations of the discipline. Firstly, this study deals with IR’s current the ontological, epistemological and methodological crisis and whether there is a real crisis in IR or not will be also questioned. Secondly, the meaning of the axiology and why axiology is important for the discipline is also dealt with. Finally, why IR has been silent about the axiology is also discussed.
format	article
author	Erdem ÖZLÜK
author_facet	Erdem ÖZLÜK
author_sort	Erdem ÖZLÜK
title	THE CRISIS AND THE AXIOLOGICAL SILENCE OF THE INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS DISCIPLINE
title_short	THE CRISIS AND THE AXIOLOGICAL SILENCE OF THE INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS DISCIPLINE
title_full	THE CRISIS AND THE AXIOLOGICAL SILENCE OF THE INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS DISCIPLINE
title_fullStr	THE CRISIS AND THE AXIOLOGICAL SILENCE OF THE INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS DISCIPLINE
title_full_unstemmed	THE CRISIS AND THE AXIOLOGICAL SILENCE OF THE INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS DISCIPLINE
title_sort	crisis and the axiological silence of the international relations discipline
publisher	Fırat University
publishDate	2019
url	https://doaj.org/article/001a375b5f9b49719ab9729bba57a586
work_keys_str_mv	AT erdemozluk thecrisisandtheaxiologicalsilenceoftheinternationalrelationsdiscipline AT erdemozluk crisisandtheaxiologicalsilenceoftheinternationalrelationsdiscipline
_version_	1718415459921952768

THE CRISIS AND THE AXIOLOGICAL SILENCE OF THE INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS DISCIPLINE

Ejemplares similares