Łacińskie lōrum w świetle etymologii

Latin lōrum in the Light of Etymology The traditional etymology of Lat. lōrum n. ‘strap, girdle, rein’, according to which it is related to Arm. lar ‘strick, rope, band’ and Greek (Homeric) εὔληρα, Doric αὔληρα n. pl. ‘reins’, should be rejected for phonological and morphological reasons. The prese...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal:	Krzysztof Tomasz Witczak
Formato:	article
Lenguaje:	DE EN FR PL RU
Publicado:	Ksiegarnia Akademicka Publishing 2017
Materias:	etymologia języki indoeuropejskie leksyka indoeuropejska łacina słowotwórstwo Language. Linguistic theory. Comparative grammar P101-410
Acceso en línea:	https://doaj.org/article/00252d0e1f21417ba509da75669c18e6
Etiquetas:	Agregar Etiqueta Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!

id	oai:doaj.org-article:00252d0e1f21417ba509da75669c18e6
record_format	dspace
spelling	oai:doaj.org-article:00252d0e1f21417ba509da75669c18e62021-11-27T13:00:30ZŁacińskie lōrum w świetle etymologii10.12797/LV.12.2017.24.121896-21222392-1226https://doaj.org/article/00252d0e1f21417ba509da75669c18e62017-11-01T00:00:00Zhttps://journals.akademicka.pl/lv/article/view/438https://doaj.org/toc/1896-2122https://doaj.org/toc/2392-1226 Latin lōrum in the Light of Etymology The traditional etymology of Lat. lōrum n. ‘strap, girdle, rein’, according to which it is related to Arm. lar ‘strick, rope, band’ and Greek (Homeric) εὔληρα, Doric αὔληρα n. pl. ‘reins’, should be rejected for phonological and morphological reasons. The present author suggests a new explanation of the Latin term in question. It derives from the Italic archetype lōsom n. ‘strap, belt, girdle’. Close equivalents are attested in Indo-Iranian, cf. Old Indic rā́snā- f. ‘girdle’ (< IE. lōsnā); Khotan Saka rrānä ‘belt’, Ossetic ron ‘belt, girdle’ (< Iranian rāhnā- < IE. lōsnā), Sogdian r’n’(kh) ‘belt’ (< Iran. rāhnā-ka-); Wakhi ran-dáq, ran-dak ‘leather strap’ (< Iran. rāhna-taka-). The Indo-European root lōs- (< PIE. leh₃s-) is also attested in Ancient Greek, cf. Gk. λῶμα n. ‘hem, fringe, border of cloths’ (< IE. lṓs-mn̥ n.), Aeolic λῶστοι pl. ‘stitched’, ἄλωστοι pl. ‘unstitched’, εὔλωστοι pl. ‘well-vowen’ (< IE. lōs-tó-). The author explains Latin lōrus (m.) as an innovative form created on the basis of the irregular plural lōrī, originally nom.-acc. du. n. lōso-ī ‘two straps, two reins’ (< PIE. leh₃so-ih₁). The loss of the dual number in the early pre-literary phase of the development of the Latin language caused the reinterpretation of preserved dual forms. It is emphasized that Lat. frēnum n. ‘bit, cub, bridle’ attests not only the regular plural frēna ‘reins’, but also the irregular frēnī (orig. nom.-acc. du. n.). Krzysztof Tomasz WitczakKsiegarnia Akademicka Publishingarticleetymologiajęzyki indoeuropejskieleksyka indoeuropejskałacinasłowotwórstwoLanguage. Linguistic theory. Comparative grammarP101-410DEENFRPLRULingVaria, Vol 12, Iss 24 (2017)
institution	DOAJ
collection	DOAJ
language	DE EN FR PL RU
topic	etymologia języki indoeuropejskie leksyka indoeuropejska łacina słowotwórstwo Language. Linguistic theory. Comparative grammar P101-410
spellingShingle	etymologia języki indoeuropejskie leksyka indoeuropejska łacina słowotwórstwo Language. Linguistic theory. Comparative grammar P101-410 Krzysztof Tomasz Witczak Łacińskie lōrum w świetle etymologii
description	Latin lōrum in the Light of Etymology The traditional etymology of Lat. lōrum n. ‘strap, girdle, rein’, according to which it is related to Arm. lar ‘strick, rope, band’ and Greek (Homeric) εὔληρα, Doric αὔληρα n. pl. ‘reins’, should be rejected for phonological and morphological reasons. The present author suggests a new explanation of the Latin term in question. It derives from the Italic archetype lōsom n. ‘strap, belt, girdle’. Close equivalents are attested in Indo-Iranian, cf. Old Indic rā́snā- f. ‘girdle’ (< IE. lōsnā); Khotan Saka rrānä ‘belt’, Ossetic ron ‘belt, girdle’ (< Iranian rāhnā- < IE. lōsnā), Sogdian r’n’(kh) ‘belt’ (< Iran. rāhnā-ka-); Wakhi ran-dáq, ran-dak ‘leather strap’ (< Iran. rāhna-taka-). The Indo-European root lōs- (< PIE. leh₃s-) is also attested in Ancient Greek, cf. Gk. λῶμα n. ‘hem, fringe, border of cloths’ (< IE. lṓs-mn̥ n.), Aeolic λῶστοι pl. ‘stitched’, ἄλωστοι pl. ‘unstitched’, εὔλωστοι pl. ‘well-vowen’ (< IE. lōs-tó-). The author explains Latin lōrus (m.) as an innovative form created on the basis of the irregular plural lōrī, originally nom.-acc. du. n. lōso-ī ‘two straps, two reins’ (< PIE. leh₃so-ih₁). The loss of the dual number in the early pre-literary phase of the development of the Latin language caused the reinterpretation of preserved dual forms. It is emphasized that Lat. frēnum n. ‘bit, cub, bridle’ attests not only the regular plural frēna ‘reins’, but also the irregular frēnī (orig. nom.-acc. du. n.).
format	article
author	Krzysztof Tomasz Witczak
author_facet	Krzysztof Tomasz Witczak
author_sort	Krzysztof Tomasz Witczak
title	Łacińskie lōrum w świetle etymologii
title_short	Łacińskie lōrum w świetle etymologii
title_full	Łacińskie lōrum w świetle etymologii
title_fullStr	Łacińskie lōrum w świetle etymologii
title_full_unstemmed	Łacińskie lōrum w świetle etymologii
title_sort	łacińskie lōrum w świetle etymologii
publisher	Ksiegarnia Akademicka Publishing
publishDate	2017
url	https://doaj.org/article/00252d0e1f21417ba509da75669c18e6
work_keys_str_mv	AT krzysztoftomaszwitczak łacinskielorumwswietleetymologii
_version_	1718408843715674112

Łacińskie lōrum w świetle etymologii

Ejemplares similares