Simple Matching Using QIIME 2 and RDP Reveals Misidentified Sequences and an Underrepresentation of Fungi in Reference Datasets

Simple nucleotide matching identification methods are not as accurate as once thought at identifying environmental fungal sequences. This is largely because of incorrect naming and the underrepresentation of various fungal groups in reference datasets. Here, we explore these issues by examining an e...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lauren E. Eldred, R. Greg Thorn, David Roy Smith
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/002db7b74a6c4e318b298f4ab786579f
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:002db7b74a6c4e318b298f4ab786579f
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:002db7b74a6c4e318b298f4ab786579f2021-12-01T07:49:13ZSimple Matching Using QIIME 2 and RDP Reveals Misidentified Sequences and an Underrepresentation of Fungi in Reference Datasets1664-802110.3389/fgene.2021.768473https://doaj.org/article/002db7b74a6c4e318b298f4ab786579f2021-11-01T00:00:00Zhttps://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fgene.2021.768473/fullhttps://doaj.org/toc/1664-8021Simple nucleotide matching identification methods are not as accurate as once thought at identifying environmental fungal sequences. This is largely because of incorrect naming and the underrepresentation of various fungal groups in reference datasets. Here, we explore these issues by examining an environmental metabarcoding dataset of partial large subunit rRNA sequences of Basidiomycota and basal fungi. We employed the simple matching method using the QIIME 2 classifier and the RDP Classifier in conjunction with the latest releases of the SILVA (138.1, 2020) and RDP (11, 2014) reference datasets and then compared the results with a manual phylogenetic binning approach. Of the 71 query sequences tested, 21 and 42% were misidentified using QIIME 2 and the RDP Classifier, respectively. Of these simple matching misidentifications, more than half resulted from the underrepresentation of various groups of fungi in the SILVA and RDP reference datasets. More comprehensive reference datasets with fewer misidentified sequences will increase the accuracy of simple matching identifications. However, we argue that the phylogenetic binning approach is a better alternative to simple matching since, in addition to better accuracy, it provides evolutionary information about query sequences.Lauren E. EldredR. Greg ThornDavid Roy SmithFrontiers Media S.A.articleBasidiomycotametabarcodingmisidentificationSILVAsequence identificationGeneticsQH426-470ENFrontiers in Genetics, Vol 12 (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic Basidiomycota
metabarcoding
misidentification
SILVA
sequence identification
Genetics
QH426-470
spellingShingle Basidiomycota
metabarcoding
misidentification
SILVA
sequence identification
Genetics
QH426-470
Lauren E. Eldred
R. Greg Thorn
David Roy Smith
Simple Matching Using QIIME 2 and RDP Reveals Misidentified Sequences and an Underrepresentation of Fungi in Reference Datasets
description Simple nucleotide matching identification methods are not as accurate as once thought at identifying environmental fungal sequences. This is largely because of incorrect naming and the underrepresentation of various fungal groups in reference datasets. Here, we explore these issues by examining an environmental metabarcoding dataset of partial large subunit rRNA sequences of Basidiomycota and basal fungi. We employed the simple matching method using the QIIME 2 classifier and the RDP Classifier in conjunction with the latest releases of the SILVA (138.1, 2020) and RDP (11, 2014) reference datasets and then compared the results with a manual phylogenetic binning approach. Of the 71 query sequences tested, 21 and 42% were misidentified using QIIME 2 and the RDP Classifier, respectively. Of these simple matching misidentifications, more than half resulted from the underrepresentation of various groups of fungi in the SILVA and RDP reference datasets. More comprehensive reference datasets with fewer misidentified sequences will increase the accuracy of simple matching identifications. However, we argue that the phylogenetic binning approach is a better alternative to simple matching since, in addition to better accuracy, it provides evolutionary information about query sequences.
format article
author Lauren E. Eldred
R. Greg Thorn
David Roy Smith
author_facet Lauren E. Eldred
R. Greg Thorn
David Roy Smith
author_sort Lauren E. Eldred
title Simple Matching Using QIIME 2 and RDP Reveals Misidentified Sequences and an Underrepresentation of Fungi in Reference Datasets
title_short Simple Matching Using QIIME 2 and RDP Reveals Misidentified Sequences and an Underrepresentation of Fungi in Reference Datasets
title_full Simple Matching Using QIIME 2 and RDP Reveals Misidentified Sequences and an Underrepresentation of Fungi in Reference Datasets
title_fullStr Simple Matching Using QIIME 2 and RDP Reveals Misidentified Sequences and an Underrepresentation of Fungi in Reference Datasets
title_full_unstemmed Simple Matching Using QIIME 2 and RDP Reveals Misidentified Sequences and an Underrepresentation of Fungi in Reference Datasets
title_sort simple matching using qiime 2 and rdp reveals misidentified sequences and an underrepresentation of fungi in reference datasets
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/002db7b74a6c4e318b298f4ab786579f
work_keys_str_mv AT laureneeldred simplematchingusingqiime2andrdprevealsmisidentifiedsequencesandanunderrepresentationoffungiinreferencedatasets
AT rgregthorn simplematchingusingqiime2andrdprevealsmisidentifiedsequencesandanunderrepresentationoffungiinreferencedatasets
AT davidroysmith simplematchingusingqiime2andrdprevealsmisidentifiedsequencesandanunderrepresentationoffungiinreferencedatasets
_version_ 1718405393687773184