The Information-Structural Status of Adjuncts: A Question-under-Discussion-Based Approach

In this paper we present an analysis of the information structural properties of different types of verb and sentence modifying adjuncts under a QUD (question under discussion) approach. Our study is based on naturalistic data from English, French and German containin...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lisa Brunetti, Kordula De Kuthy, Arndt Riester
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
FR
Publicado: Presses universitaires de Caen 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/002f700d32f849b3855cebbf40b23d6c
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:002f700d32f849b3855cebbf40b23d6c
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:002f700d32f849b3855cebbf40b23d6c2021-12-02T09:54:54ZThe Information-Structural Status of Adjuncts: A Question-under-Discussion-Based Approach1963-172310.4000/discours.11454https://doaj.org/article/002f700d32f849b3855cebbf40b23d6c2021-10-01T00:00:00Zhttp://journals.openedition.org/discours/11454https://doaj.org/toc/1963-1723In this paper we present an analysis of the information structural properties of different types of verb and sentence modifying adjuncts under a QUD (question under discussion) approach. Our study is based on naturalistic data from English, French and German containing adjuncts such as temporal, spatial, or manner prepositional phrases, as well as different types of adverbial clauses. The analysis relies on the approach by Riester et al. (2018), which identifies the (generally implicit, sometimes overt) QUD preceding each utterance of a text by means of pragmatic principles, and derives from it the information structure of the utterance. The analysis of adjuncts within this approach shows that in certain contexts, despite conveying new information, adjuncts do not answer the QUD that is answered by the sentence they syntactically depend on. We argue that these adjuncts answer a different QUD and behave as independent discourse units. As such, they have an information structure of their own and are in a rhetorical relation with their host clause. Our analysis sheds light on the similarities between adjuncts and Potts’ (2005) supplements. Both can be accounted for as independent discourse units; however, while supplements display projective behavior, adjuncts do not. Following Venhuizen et al. (2014), we ascribe this difference to their different semantic anchor (nominal vs. verbal). Our work therefore highlights a different way for an expression to be independent at a discourse level, other than being projective content.Lisa BrunettiKordula De KuthyArndt RiesterPresses universitaires de Caenarticleadjunctsquestion under discussioninformation structureannotationdiscourse structure(non-)at-issuenessPhilology. LinguisticsP1-1091Computational linguistics. Natural language processingP98-98.5ENFRDiscours , Vol 28 (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
FR
topic adjuncts
question under discussion
information structure
annotation
discourse structure
(non-)at-issueness
Philology. Linguistics
P1-1091
Computational linguistics. Natural language processing
P98-98.5
spellingShingle adjuncts
question under discussion
information structure
annotation
discourse structure
(non-)at-issueness
Philology. Linguistics
P1-1091
Computational linguistics. Natural language processing
P98-98.5
Lisa Brunetti
Kordula De Kuthy
Arndt Riester
The Information-Structural Status of Adjuncts: A Question-under-Discussion-Based Approach
description In this paper we present an analysis of the information structural properties of different types of verb and sentence modifying adjuncts under a QUD (question under discussion) approach. Our study is based on naturalistic data from English, French and German containing adjuncts such as temporal, spatial, or manner prepositional phrases, as well as different types of adverbial clauses. The analysis relies on the approach by Riester et al. (2018), which identifies the (generally implicit, sometimes overt) QUD preceding each utterance of a text by means of pragmatic principles, and derives from it the information structure of the utterance. The analysis of adjuncts within this approach shows that in certain contexts, despite conveying new information, adjuncts do not answer the QUD that is answered by the sentence they syntactically depend on. We argue that these adjuncts answer a different QUD and behave as independent discourse units. As such, they have an information structure of their own and are in a rhetorical relation with their host clause. Our analysis sheds light on the similarities between adjuncts and Potts’ (2005) supplements. Both can be accounted for as independent discourse units; however, while supplements display projective behavior, adjuncts do not. Following Venhuizen et al. (2014), we ascribe this difference to their different semantic anchor (nominal vs. verbal). Our work therefore highlights a different way for an expression to be independent at a discourse level, other than being projective content.
format article
author Lisa Brunetti
Kordula De Kuthy
Arndt Riester
author_facet Lisa Brunetti
Kordula De Kuthy
Arndt Riester
author_sort Lisa Brunetti
title The Information-Structural Status of Adjuncts: A Question-under-Discussion-Based Approach
title_short The Information-Structural Status of Adjuncts: A Question-under-Discussion-Based Approach
title_full The Information-Structural Status of Adjuncts: A Question-under-Discussion-Based Approach
title_fullStr The Information-Structural Status of Adjuncts: A Question-under-Discussion-Based Approach
title_full_unstemmed The Information-Structural Status of Adjuncts: A Question-under-Discussion-Based Approach
title_sort information-structural status of adjuncts: a question-under-discussion-based approach
publisher Presses universitaires de Caen
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/002f700d32f849b3855cebbf40b23d6c
work_keys_str_mv AT lisabrunetti theinformationstructuralstatusofadjunctsaquestionunderdiscussionbasedapproach
AT korduladekuthy theinformationstructuralstatusofadjunctsaquestionunderdiscussionbasedapproach
AT arndtriester theinformationstructuralstatusofadjunctsaquestionunderdiscussionbasedapproach
AT lisabrunetti informationstructuralstatusofadjunctsaquestionunderdiscussionbasedapproach
AT korduladekuthy informationstructuralstatusofadjunctsaquestionunderdiscussionbasedapproach
AT arndtriester informationstructuralstatusofadjunctsaquestionunderdiscussionbasedapproach
_version_ 1718397866305650688