Janusz Radziwiłł, czyli o odpowiedzialności polityka

Prince Janusz Radziwiłł – the responsibility of a politician In 1654, Moscow broke the peace treaty with the Kingdom of Poland and started military operations. Sweden followed suit in 1655. The Grand Duchy of Lithuania (which had been part of the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth since 1569), depri...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Henryk Wisner
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
PL
RU
Publicado: Ksiegarnia Akademicka Publishing 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/004b907d265c43c5a216498732f59351
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:004b907d265c43c5a216498732f59351
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:004b907d265c43c5a216498732f593512021-11-27T12:56:20ZJanusz Radziwiłł, czyli o odpowiedzialności polityka2081-9463https://doaj.org/article/004b907d265c43c5a216498732f593512021-07-01T00:00:00Zhttps://journals.akademicka.pl/kpk/article/view/1986https://doaj.org/toc/2081-9463 Prince Janusz Radziwiłł – the responsibility of a politician In 1654, Moscow broke the peace treaty with the Kingdom of Poland and started military operations. Sweden followed suit in 1655. The Grand Duchy of Lithuania (which had been part of the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth since 1569), deprived of Polish aid, was unable to resist the combined forces of Moscow and the Cossacks. What’s more, the military operations were accompanied with the extermination and abduction of the population into the Muscovite state. In this situation, Lithuania decided to choose the lesser of two evils and subject itself to Sweden. The idea originated from the bishop of Vilnius, Jerzy Tyszkiewicz, but the major role in the negotiations was played by Janusz Radziwiłł (1612-1655), voivode of Vilnius and the Grand Hetman of Lithuania. As a result, he is considered a traitor in Poland. In Lithuania, he was proclaimed a hero who severed the much-criticized relationship with Poland. According to the author, the Prince did not make a choice between Poland and Sweden, but between Sweden and complete annihilation. The question to be asked is not whether the Prince’s decision was an act of betrayal (this also needs to be further specified: who did he betray? Poland? The Crown? Or also Lithuania?). One needs to ask: how should a person who feels responsible for their country have behaved when faced with such insurmountable odds? Henryk WisnerKsiegarnia Akademicka PublishingarticleHistory of Eastern EuropeDJK1-77Ethnology. Social and cultural anthropologyGN301-674ENPLRUKrakowskie Pismo Kresowe, Vol 3, Iss 3 (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
PL
RU
topic History of Eastern Europe
DJK1-77
Ethnology. Social and cultural anthropology
GN301-674
spellingShingle History of Eastern Europe
DJK1-77
Ethnology. Social and cultural anthropology
GN301-674
Henryk Wisner
Janusz Radziwiłł, czyli o odpowiedzialności polityka
description Prince Janusz Radziwiłł – the responsibility of a politician In 1654, Moscow broke the peace treaty with the Kingdom of Poland and started military operations. Sweden followed suit in 1655. The Grand Duchy of Lithuania (which had been part of the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth since 1569), deprived of Polish aid, was unable to resist the combined forces of Moscow and the Cossacks. What’s more, the military operations were accompanied with the extermination and abduction of the population into the Muscovite state. In this situation, Lithuania decided to choose the lesser of two evils and subject itself to Sweden. The idea originated from the bishop of Vilnius, Jerzy Tyszkiewicz, but the major role in the negotiations was played by Janusz Radziwiłł (1612-1655), voivode of Vilnius and the Grand Hetman of Lithuania. As a result, he is considered a traitor in Poland. In Lithuania, he was proclaimed a hero who severed the much-criticized relationship with Poland. According to the author, the Prince did not make a choice between Poland and Sweden, but between Sweden and complete annihilation. The question to be asked is not whether the Prince’s decision was an act of betrayal (this also needs to be further specified: who did he betray? Poland? The Crown? Or also Lithuania?). One needs to ask: how should a person who feels responsible for their country have behaved when faced with such insurmountable odds?
format article
author Henryk Wisner
author_facet Henryk Wisner
author_sort Henryk Wisner
title Janusz Radziwiłł, czyli o odpowiedzialności polityka
title_short Janusz Radziwiłł, czyli o odpowiedzialności polityka
title_full Janusz Radziwiłł, czyli o odpowiedzialności polityka
title_fullStr Janusz Radziwiłł, czyli o odpowiedzialności polityka
title_full_unstemmed Janusz Radziwiłł, czyli o odpowiedzialności polityka
title_sort janusz radziwiłł, czyli o odpowiedzialności polityka
publisher Ksiegarnia Akademicka Publishing
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/004b907d265c43c5a216498732f59351
work_keys_str_mv AT henrykwisner januszradziwiłłczylioodpowiedzialnoscipolityka
_version_ 1718408903939588096