Intention-based and sensory-based predictions

Abstract We inhabit a continuously changing world, where the ability to anticipate future states of the environment is critical for adaptation. Anticipation can be achieved by learning about the causal or temporal relationship between sensory events, as well as by learning to act on the environment...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales:	Álvaro Darriba, Yi-Fang Hsu, Sandrien Van Ommen, Florian Waszak
Formato:	article
Lenguaje:	EN
Publicado:	Nature Portfolio 2021
Materias:	Medicine R Science Q
Acceso en línea:	https://doaj.org/article/00569dda8dc0435d8eff626e0ccbcb8e
Etiquetas:	Agregar Etiqueta Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!

id	oai:doaj.org-article:00569dda8dc0435d8eff626e0ccbcb8e
record_format	dspace
spelling	oai:doaj.org-article:00569dda8dc0435d8eff626e0ccbcb8e2021-12-02T19:16:14ZIntention-based and sensory-based predictions10.1038/s41598-021-99445-z2045-2322https://doaj.org/article/00569dda8dc0435d8eff626e0ccbcb8e2021-10-01T00:00:00Zhttps://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-99445-zhttps://doaj.org/toc/2045-2322Abstract We inhabit a continuously changing world, where the ability to anticipate future states of the environment is critical for adaptation. Anticipation can be achieved by learning about the causal or temporal relationship between sensory events, as well as by learning to act on the environment to produce an intended effect. Together, sensory-based and intention-based predictions provide the flexibility needed to successfully adapt. Yet it is currently unknown whether the two sources of information are processed independently to form separate predictions, or are combined into a common prediction. To investigate this, we ran an experiment in which the final tone of two possible four-tone sequences could be predicted from the preceding tones in the sequence and/or from the participants’ intention to trigger that final tone. This tone could be congruent with both sensory-based and intention-based predictions, incongruent with both, or congruent with one while incongruent with the other. Trials where predictions were incongruent with each other yielded similar prediction error responses irrespectively of the violated prediction, indicating that both predictions were formulated and coexisted simultaneously. The violation of intention-based predictions yielded late additional error responses, suggesting that those violations underwent further differential processing which the violations of sensory-based predictions did not receive.Álvaro DarribaYi-Fang HsuSandrien Van OmmenFlorian WaszakNature PortfolioarticleMedicineRScienceQENScientific Reports, Vol 11, Iss 1, Pp 1-16 (2021)
institution	DOAJ
collection	DOAJ
language	EN
topic	Medicine R Science Q
spellingShingle	Medicine R Science Q Álvaro Darriba Yi-Fang Hsu Sandrien Van Ommen Florian Waszak Intention-based and sensory-based predictions
description	Abstract We inhabit a continuously changing world, where the ability to anticipate future states of the environment is critical for adaptation. Anticipation can be achieved by learning about the causal or temporal relationship between sensory events, as well as by learning to act on the environment to produce an intended effect. Together, sensory-based and intention-based predictions provide the flexibility needed to successfully adapt. Yet it is currently unknown whether the two sources of information are processed independently to form separate predictions, or are combined into a common prediction. To investigate this, we ran an experiment in which the final tone of two possible four-tone sequences could be predicted from the preceding tones in the sequence and/or from the participants’ intention to trigger that final tone. This tone could be congruent with both sensory-based and intention-based predictions, incongruent with both, or congruent with one while incongruent with the other. Trials where predictions were incongruent with each other yielded similar prediction error responses irrespectively of the violated prediction, indicating that both predictions were formulated and coexisted simultaneously. The violation of intention-based predictions yielded late additional error responses, suggesting that those violations underwent further differential processing which the violations of sensory-based predictions did not receive.
format	article
author	Álvaro Darriba Yi-Fang Hsu Sandrien Van Ommen Florian Waszak
author_facet	Álvaro Darriba Yi-Fang Hsu Sandrien Van Ommen Florian Waszak
author_sort	Álvaro Darriba
title	Intention-based and sensory-based predictions
title_short	Intention-based and sensory-based predictions
title_full	Intention-based and sensory-based predictions
title_fullStr	Intention-based and sensory-based predictions
title_full_unstemmed	Intention-based and sensory-based predictions
title_sort	intention-based and sensory-based predictions
publisher	Nature Portfolio
publishDate	2021
url	https://doaj.org/article/00569dda8dc0435d8eff626e0ccbcb8e
work_keys_str_mv	AT alvarodarriba intentionbasedandsensorybasedpredictions AT yifanghsu intentionbasedandsensorybasedpredictions AT sandrienvanommen intentionbasedandsensorybasedpredictions AT florianwaszak intentionbasedandsensorybasedpredictions
_version_	1718376951376248832

Intention-based and sensory-based predictions

Ejemplares similares