What could Paul have meant by ‘against nature’ (παρὰ φύσιν) as written in Romans 1:26? Striving for the well-being and health of all people

The point of departure of this article is postmodern philosopher Michel Foucault’s ‘archaeological analysis’ of the history of sexuality, seen from the lens of the South African philosopher Johann Beukes. Foucault points out that since the circulation of the so-called handbooks on penance in the 6th...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Andries G. van Aarde
Formato: article
Lenguaje:AF
EN
NL
Publicado: AOSIS 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/00691a8a99b04586a3bccdf3d90191e1
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:00691a8a99b04586a3bccdf3d90191e1
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:00691a8a99b04586a3bccdf3d90191e12021-11-24T07:40:40ZWhat could Paul have meant by ‘against nature’ (παρὰ φύσιν) as written in Romans 1:26? Striving for the well-being and health of all people0259-94222072-805010.4102/hts.v77i2.7060https://doaj.org/article/00691a8a99b04586a3bccdf3d90191e12021-10-01T00:00:00Zhttps://hts.org.za/index.php/hts/article/view/7060https://doaj.org/toc/0259-9422https://doaj.org/toc/2072-8050The point of departure of this article is postmodern philosopher Michel Foucault’s ‘archaeological analysis’ of the history of sexuality, seen from the lens of the South African philosopher Johann Beukes. Foucault points out that since the circulation of the so-called handbooks on penance in the 6th century CE, same-gender sex was seen as a punishable sin. With regard to perspectives before this period, Foucault reflects specifically on the contribution of the Christian theologian Augustine (354–430 CE), and particularly Augustine’s interpretation of the Greek expression para phusin (παρὰ φύσιν) as ‘against nature’ as written in Paul’s letter to the Romans (1:26). He argues that this interpretation by Augustine represents a trend in contemporaneous thinking of non-Christian writers such as Plutarch and Themistios. The aim of this article is to demonstrate that a much more influential stimulus from another non-Christian thinker, namely Artemidorus of Daldis (2nd century CE), created a common context that influenced Augustine’s views and subsequently those on same-gender sex, sexual identity, and heterosexual marriage within the Christian tradition. Contribution: The article shows how modern-day homophobia and aversion in same-gender sex do not have its primarily ground in Paul’s use of para phusin, but that Augustine and present-day homophobes in the Christian (including the Reformed) tradition do have their roots in a non-Christian conviction without realising its intercultural and non-Christian origins.Andries G. van AardeAOSISarticlegender justicesame-gender sexpluriform sexual identitiesheterosexual marriageprocreationonanismartemidorus of daldisaugustine of hippoThe BibleBS1-2970Practical TheologyBV1-5099AFENNLHTS Teologiese Studies/Theological Studies , Vol 77, Iss 2, Pp e1-e8 (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language AF
EN
NL
topic gender justice
same-gender sex
pluriform sexual identities
heterosexual marriage
procreation
onanism
artemidorus of daldis
augustine of hippo
The Bible
BS1-2970
Practical Theology
BV1-5099
spellingShingle gender justice
same-gender sex
pluriform sexual identities
heterosexual marriage
procreation
onanism
artemidorus of daldis
augustine of hippo
The Bible
BS1-2970
Practical Theology
BV1-5099
Andries G. van Aarde
What could Paul have meant by ‘against nature’ (παρὰ φύσιν) as written in Romans 1:26? Striving for the well-being and health of all people
description The point of departure of this article is postmodern philosopher Michel Foucault’s ‘archaeological analysis’ of the history of sexuality, seen from the lens of the South African philosopher Johann Beukes. Foucault points out that since the circulation of the so-called handbooks on penance in the 6th century CE, same-gender sex was seen as a punishable sin. With regard to perspectives before this period, Foucault reflects specifically on the contribution of the Christian theologian Augustine (354–430 CE), and particularly Augustine’s interpretation of the Greek expression para phusin (παρὰ φύσιν) as ‘against nature’ as written in Paul’s letter to the Romans (1:26). He argues that this interpretation by Augustine represents a trend in contemporaneous thinking of non-Christian writers such as Plutarch and Themistios. The aim of this article is to demonstrate that a much more influential stimulus from another non-Christian thinker, namely Artemidorus of Daldis (2nd century CE), created a common context that influenced Augustine’s views and subsequently those on same-gender sex, sexual identity, and heterosexual marriage within the Christian tradition. Contribution: The article shows how modern-day homophobia and aversion in same-gender sex do not have its primarily ground in Paul’s use of para phusin, but that Augustine and present-day homophobes in the Christian (including the Reformed) tradition do have their roots in a non-Christian conviction without realising its intercultural and non-Christian origins.
format article
author Andries G. van Aarde
author_facet Andries G. van Aarde
author_sort Andries G. van Aarde
title What could Paul have meant by ‘against nature’ (παρὰ φύσιν) as written in Romans 1:26? Striving for the well-being and health of all people
title_short What could Paul have meant by ‘against nature’ (παρὰ φύσιν) as written in Romans 1:26? Striving for the well-being and health of all people
title_full What could Paul have meant by ‘against nature’ (παρὰ φύσιν) as written in Romans 1:26? Striving for the well-being and health of all people
title_fullStr What could Paul have meant by ‘against nature’ (παρὰ φύσιν) as written in Romans 1:26? Striving for the well-being and health of all people
title_full_unstemmed What could Paul have meant by ‘against nature’ (παρὰ φύσιν) as written in Romans 1:26? Striving for the well-being and health of all people
title_sort what could paul have meant by ‘against nature’ (παρὰ φύσιν) as written in romans 1:26? striving for the well-being and health of all people
publisher AOSIS
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/00691a8a99b04586a3bccdf3d90191e1
work_keys_str_mv AT andriesgvanaarde whatcouldpaulhavemeantbyagainstnatureparaphysinaswritteninromans126strivingforthewellbeingandhealthofallpeople
_version_ 1718415896298389504