A Comparison of the American Society of Cataract and Refractive Surgery post-myopic LASIK/PRK Intraocular Lens (IOL) calculator and the Ocular MD IOL calculator
David L DeMill1, Majid Moshirfar1, Marcus C Neuffer1, Maylon Hsu1, Shameema Sikder21John A Moran Eye Center, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA; 2Wilmer Eye Institute, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USABackground: To compare the average values of the American Society of Cataract a...
Guardado en:
| Autores principales: | , , , , |
|---|---|
| Formato: | article |
| Lenguaje: | EN |
| Publicado: |
Dove Medical Press
2011
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | https://doaj.org/article/007750a2663f4303959d325cf467d633 |
| Etiquetas: |
Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
|
| id |
oai:doaj.org-article:007750a2663f4303959d325cf467d633 |
|---|---|
| record_format |
dspace |
| spelling |
oai:doaj.org-article:007750a2663f4303959d325cf467d6332021-12-02T01:41:44ZA Comparison of the American Society of Cataract and Refractive Surgery post-myopic LASIK/PRK Intraocular Lens (IOL) calculator and the Ocular MD IOL calculator1177-54671177-5483https://doaj.org/article/007750a2663f4303959d325cf467d6332011-09-01T00:00:00Zhttp://www.dovepress.com/a-comparison-of-the-american-society-of-cataract-and-refractive-surger-a8366https://doaj.org/toc/1177-5467https://doaj.org/toc/1177-5483David L DeMill1, Majid Moshirfar1, Marcus C Neuffer1, Maylon Hsu1, Shameema Sikder21John A Moran Eye Center, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA; 2Wilmer Eye Institute, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USABackground: To compare the average values of the American Society of Cataract and Refractive Surgery (ASCRS) and Ocular MD intraocular lens (IOL) calculators to assess their accuracy in predicting IOL power in patients with prior laser-in-situ keratomileusis (LASIK) or photorefractive keratectomy.Methods: In this retrospective study, data from 21 eyes with previous LASIK or photorefractive keratectomy for myopia and subsequent cataract surgery was used in an IOL calculator comparison. The predicted IOL powers of the Ocular MD SRK/T, Ocular MD Haigis, and ASCRS averages were compared. The Ocular MD average (composed of an average of Ocular MD SRK/T and Ocular MD Haigis) and the all calculator average (composed of an average of Ocular MD SRK/T, Ocular MD Haigis, and ASCRS) were also compared. Primary outcome measures were mean arithmetic and absolute IOL prediction error, variance in mean arithmetic IOL prediction error, and the percentage of eyes within ±0.50 and ±1.00 D.Results: The Ocular MD SRK/T and Ocular MD Haigis averages produced mean arithmetic IOL prediction errors of 0.57 and –0.61 diopters (D), respectively, which were significantly larger than errors from the ASCRS, Ocular MD, and all calculator averages (0.11, –0.02, and 0.02 D, respectively, all P < 0.05). There was no statistically significant difference between the methods in absolute IOL prediction error, variance, or the percentage of eyes with outcomes within ±0.50 and ±1.00 D.Conclusion: The ASCRS average was more accurate in predicting IOL power than the Ocular MD SRK/T and Ocular MD Haigis averages alone. Our methods using combinations of these averages which, when compared with the individual averages, showed a trend of decreased mean arithmetic IOL prediction error, mean absolute upper limit of IOL prediction error, and variance, while increasing the percentage of outcomes within ±0.50 D.Keywords: laser-in-situ keratomileusis, photorefractive keratectomy, intraocular lens calculator, ocular MD, American Society of Cataract and Refractive SurgeryHsu MNeuffer MCMoshirfar MDeMill DLSikder SDove Medical PressarticleOphthalmologyRE1-994ENClinical Ophthalmology, Vol 2011, Iss default, Pp 1409-1414 (2011) |
| institution |
DOAJ |
| collection |
DOAJ |
| language |
EN |
| topic |
Ophthalmology RE1-994 |
| spellingShingle |
Ophthalmology RE1-994 Hsu M Neuffer MC Moshirfar M DeMill DL Sikder S A Comparison of the American Society of Cataract and Refractive Surgery post-myopic LASIK/PRK Intraocular Lens (IOL) calculator and the Ocular MD IOL calculator |
| description |
David L DeMill1, Majid Moshirfar1, Marcus C Neuffer1, Maylon Hsu1, Shameema Sikder21John A Moran Eye Center, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA; 2Wilmer Eye Institute, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USABackground: To compare the average values of the American Society of Cataract and Refractive Surgery (ASCRS) and Ocular MD intraocular lens (IOL) calculators to assess their accuracy in predicting IOL power in patients with prior laser-in-situ keratomileusis (LASIK) or photorefractive keratectomy.Methods: In this retrospective study, data from 21 eyes with previous LASIK or photorefractive keratectomy for myopia and subsequent cataract surgery was used in an IOL calculator comparison. The predicted IOL powers of the Ocular MD SRK/T, Ocular MD Haigis, and ASCRS averages were compared. The Ocular MD average (composed of an average of Ocular MD SRK/T and Ocular MD Haigis) and the all calculator average (composed of an average of Ocular MD SRK/T, Ocular MD Haigis, and ASCRS) were also compared. Primary outcome measures were mean arithmetic and absolute IOL prediction error, variance in mean arithmetic IOL prediction error, and the percentage of eyes within ±0.50 and ±1.00 D.Results: The Ocular MD SRK/T and Ocular MD Haigis averages produced mean arithmetic IOL prediction errors of 0.57 and –0.61 diopters (D), respectively, which were significantly larger than errors from the ASCRS, Ocular MD, and all calculator averages (0.11, –0.02, and 0.02 D, respectively, all P < 0.05). There was no statistically significant difference between the methods in absolute IOL prediction error, variance, or the percentage of eyes with outcomes within ±0.50 and ±1.00 D.Conclusion: The ASCRS average was more accurate in predicting IOL power than the Ocular MD SRK/T and Ocular MD Haigis averages alone. Our methods using combinations of these averages which, when compared with the individual averages, showed a trend of decreased mean arithmetic IOL prediction error, mean absolute upper limit of IOL prediction error, and variance, while increasing the percentage of outcomes within ±0.50 D.Keywords: laser-in-situ keratomileusis, photorefractive keratectomy, intraocular lens calculator, ocular MD, American Society of Cataract and Refractive Surgery |
| format |
article |
| author |
Hsu M Neuffer MC Moshirfar M DeMill DL Sikder S |
| author_facet |
Hsu M Neuffer MC Moshirfar M DeMill DL Sikder S |
| author_sort |
Hsu M |
| title |
A Comparison of the American Society of Cataract and Refractive Surgery post-myopic LASIK/PRK Intraocular Lens (IOL) calculator and the Ocular MD IOL calculator |
| title_short |
A Comparison of the American Society of Cataract and Refractive Surgery post-myopic LASIK/PRK Intraocular Lens (IOL) calculator and the Ocular MD IOL calculator |
| title_full |
A Comparison of the American Society of Cataract and Refractive Surgery post-myopic LASIK/PRK Intraocular Lens (IOL) calculator and the Ocular MD IOL calculator |
| title_fullStr |
A Comparison of the American Society of Cataract and Refractive Surgery post-myopic LASIK/PRK Intraocular Lens (IOL) calculator and the Ocular MD IOL calculator |
| title_full_unstemmed |
A Comparison of the American Society of Cataract and Refractive Surgery post-myopic LASIK/PRK Intraocular Lens (IOL) calculator and the Ocular MD IOL calculator |
| title_sort |
comparison of the american society of cataract and refractive surgery post-myopic lasik/prk intraocular lens (iol) calculator and the ocular md iol calculator |
| publisher |
Dove Medical Press |
| publishDate |
2011 |
| url |
https://doaj.org/article/007750a2663f4303959d325cf467d633 |
| work_keys_str_mv |
AT hsum acomparisonoftheamericansocietyofcataractandrefractivesurgerypostmyopiclasikprkintraocularlensiolcalculatorandtheocularmdiolcalculator AT neuffermc acomparisonoftheamericansocietyofcataractandrefractivesurgerypostmyopiclasikprkintraocularlensiolcalculatorandtheocularmdiolcalculator AT moshirfarm acomparisonoftheamericansocietyofcataractandrefractivesurgerypostmyopiclasikprkintraocularlensiolcalculatorandtheocularmdiolcalculator AT demilldl acomparisonoftheamericansocietyofcataractandrefractivesurgerypostmyopiclasikprkintraocularlensiolcalculatorandtheocularmdiolcalculator AT sikders acomparisonoftheamericansocietyofcataractandrefractivesurgerypostmyopiclasikprkintraocularlensiolcalculatorandtheocularmdiolcalculator AT hsum comparisonoftheamericansocietyofcataractandrefractivesurgerypostmyopiclasikprkintraocularlensiolcalculatorandtheocularmdiolcalculator AT neuffermc comparisonoftheamericansocietyofcataractandrefractivesurgerypostmyopiclasikprkintraocularlensiolcalculatorandtheocularmdiolcalculator AT moshirfarm comparisonoftheamericansocietyofcataractandrefractivesurgerypostmyopiclasikprkintraocularlensiolcalculatorandtheocularmdiolcalculator AT demilldl comparisonoftheamericansocietyofcataractandrefractivesurgerypostmyopiclasikprkintraocularlensiolcalculatorandtheocularmdiolcalculator AT sikders comparisonoftheamericansocietyofcataractandrefractivesurgerypostmyopiclasikprkintraocularlensiolcalculatorandtheocularmdiolcalculator |
| _version_ |
1718402878092083200 |