Doppler-based Renal Resistive Index for Prediction of Acute Kidney Injury in Critically Ill Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Objectives: To determine the efficacy of Doppler-based renal resistive index (RRI) in the prediction of acute kidney injury (AKI) in critically ill patients. Methods: A systematic review and meta-analysis of cohort studies was conducted. Relevant studies were identified in PubMed, Embase and Cochran...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Jianing Zhu, MD, Ying Zhang, MD, Xiaoming Li, MD, Qiuyang Li, MD, PHD, Yukun Luo, MD, PHD
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Editorial Office of Advanced Ultrasound in Diagnosis and Therapy 2021
Materias:
R
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/00945e1e55634f57bd6728f2ad6da3ec
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:00945e1e55634f57bd6728f2ad6da3ec
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:00945e1e55634f57bd6728f2ad6da3ec2021-11-05T08:34:43ZDoppler-based Renal Resistive Index for Prediction of Acute Kidney Injury in Critically Ill Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis2576-251610.37015/AUDT.2021.210013https://doaj.org/article/00945e1e55634f57bd6728f2ad6da3ec2021-09-01T00:00:00Zhttp://www.journaladvancedultrasound.com:81/fileup/2576-2516/PDF/1630472662882-1818385778.pdfhttps://doaj.org/toc/2576-2516Objectives: To determine the efficacy of Doppler-based renal resistive index (RRI) in the prediction of acute kidney injury (AKI) in critically ill patients. Methods: A systematic review and meta-analysis of cohort studies was conducted. Relevant studies were identified in PubMed, Embase and Cochrane Library from inception to November 1, 2020, and reference lists of identified primary studies. Prospective studies that examined the diagnostic accuracy of RRI in AKI were included. Results: Among the 126 articles identified, 18 were included, with a total of 1656 patients. Bivariate analysis yielded pooled sensitivity and specificity of 0.81 (95% CI 0.74-0.86) and 0.75 (95% CI 0.65-0.83), respectively. The summary positive likelihood ratio was 3.2 (95% CI 2.2-4.6), and negative likelihood ratio was 0.26 (95% CI 0.19-0.36). Conclusion: Elevated RRI may be an early predictor of AKI in critically ill patients. Further large-scale prospective studies are needed to confirm the predictive efficacy and determine the performance and optimal cutoff value of RRI among the included studies.Jianing Zhu, MD, Ying Zhang, MD, Xiaoming Li, MD, Qiuyang Li, MD, PHD, Yukun Luo, MD, PHDEditorial Office of Advanced Ultrasound in Diagnosis and Therapyarticle|acute kidney injury|renal resistive index|critically ill patients|systematic review|meta-analysisMedical technologyR855-855.5MedicineRENAdvanced Ultrasound in Diagnosis and Therapy, Vol 5, Iss 3, Pp 183-196 (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic |acute kidney injury|renal resistive index|critically ill patients|systematic review|meta-analysis
Medical technology
R855-855.5
Medicine
R
spellingShingle |acute kidney injury|renal resistive index|critically ill patients|systematic review|meta-analysis
Medical technology
R855-855.5
Medicine
R
Jianing Zhu, MD, Ying Zhang, MD, Xiaoming Li, MD, Qiuyang Li, MD, PHD, Yukun Luo, MD, PHD
Doppler-based Renal Resistive Index for Prediction of Acute Kidney Injury in Critically Ill Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
description Objectives: To determine the efficacy of Doppler-based renal resistive index (RRI) in the prediction of acute kidney injury (AKI) in critically ill patients. Methods: A systematic review and meta-analysis of cohort studies was conducted. Relevant studies were identified in PubMed, Embase and Cochrane Library from inception to November 1, 2020, and reference lists of identified primary studies. Prospective studies that examined the diagnostic accuracy of RRI in AKI were included. Results: Among the 126 articles identified, 18 were included, with a total of 1656 patients. Bivariate analysis yielded pooled sensitivity and specificity of 0.81 (95% CI 0.74-0.86) and 0.75 (95% CI 0.65-0.83), respectively. The summary positive likelihood ratio was 3.2 (95% CI 2.2-4.6), and negative likelihood ratio was 0.26 (95% CI 0.19-0.36). Conclusion: Elevated RRI may be an early predictor of AKI in critically ill patients. Further large-scale prospective studies are needed to confirm the predictive efficacy and determine the performance and optimal cutoff value of RRI among the included studies.
format article
author Jianing Zhu, MD, Ying Zhang, MD, Xiaoming Li, MD, Qiuyang Li, MD, PHD, Yukun Luo, MD, PHD
author_facet Jianing Zhu, MD, Ying Zhang, MD, Xiaoming Li, MD, Qiuyang Li, MD, PHD, Yukun Luo, MD, PHD
author_sort Jianing Zhu, MD, Ying Zhang, MD, Xiaoming Li, MD, Qiuyang Li, MD, PHD, Yukun Luo, MD, PHD
title Doppler-based Renal Resistive Index for Prediction of Acute Kidney Injury in Critically Ill Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
title_short Doppler-based Renal Resistive Index for Prediction of Acute Kidney Injury in Critically Ill Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
title_full Doppler-based Renal Resistive Index for Prediction of Acute Kidney Injury in Critically Ill Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
title_fullStr Doppler-based Renal Resistive Index for Prediction of Acute Kidney Injury in Critically Ill Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Doppler-based Renal Resistive Index for Prediction of Acute Kidney Injury in Critically Ill Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
title_sort doppler-based renal resistive index for prediction of acute kidney injury in critically ill patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis
publisher Editorial Office of Advanced Ultrasound in Diagnosis and Therapy
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/00945e1e55634f57bd6728f2ad6da3ec
work_keys_str_mv AT jianingzhumdyingzhangmdxiaominglimdqiuyanglimdphdyukunluomdphd dopplerbasedrenalresistiveindexforpredictionofacutekidneyinjuryincriticallyillpatientsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
_version_ 1718444449256701952