Rank‐based energy scheduling strategy of networked microgrids in distribution systems

Abstract Microgrids (MGs) have emerged as a key platform for integrating distributed energy resources into distribution systems. However, a high penetration of renewable energy resources in an MG causes an imbalance frequently between energy generation and load. One solution to this problem is inter...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Nitesh Funde, Sung‐Guk Yoon
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Wiley 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/00e0718f427d43ed8e5f200106595bba
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:00e0718f427d43ed8e5f200106595bba
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:00e0718f427d43ed8e5f200106595bba2021-12-02T14:01:23ZRank‐based energy scheduling strategy of networked microgrids in distribution systems1751-86951751-868710.1049/gtd2.12279https://doaj.org/article/00e0718f427d43ed8e5f200106595bba2022-01-01T00:00:00Zhttps://doi.org/10.1049/gtd2.12279https://doaj.org/toc/1751-8687https://doaj.org/toc/1751-8695Abstract Microgrids (MGs) have emerged as a key platform for integrating distributed energy resources into distribution systems. However, a high penetration of renewable energy resources in an MG causes an imbalance frequently between energy generation and load. One solution to this problem is internal energy trading among MGs, where MGs trade (i.e. buy or sell) energy with other MGs in the network. In internal trading, multiple buyer MGs may compete to obtain energy from seller MGs with surplus energy. By contrast, seller MGs also compete to sell their surplus to those confronted with a deficit. Considering this scenario, we propose a novel rank‐based energy scheduling strategy for networked MGs in a distribution system to solve the competition between buyer and seller MGs. The technique for order of preference by similarity to the ideal solution method, which is a multi‐criteria decision‐making approach, is applied to prioritise the MGs. The proposed strategy determines the amount of internal energy to trade for each seller/buyer MG. Different from existing mechanisms, the proposed rank‐based approach evaluates each MG with respect to four criteria: ratio of energy, forecasting accuracy, contribution of supply, and historical performance. The proposed strategy is compared with existing no‐rank‐based scheduling and absolute contribution‐based method. Moreover, the effect of each criterion on the cost of each MG is illustrated by considering and disregarding the criterion in the proposed strategy that demonstrates the effectiveness of the proposed strategy in reducing the cost of MGs according to their rank in the network.Nitesh FundeSung‐Guk YoonWileyarticleDistribution or transmission of electric powerTK3001-3521Production of electric energy or power. Powerplants. Central stationsTK1001-1841ENIET Generation, Transmission & Distribution, Vol 16, Iss 1, Pp 84-98 (2022)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic Distribution or transmission of electric power
TK3001-3521
Production of electric energy or power. Powerplants. Central stations
TK1001-1841
spellingShingle Distribution or transmission of electric power
TK3001-3521
Production of electric energy or power. Powerplants. Central stations
TK1001-1841
Nitesh Funde
Sung‐Guk Yoon
Rank‐based energy scheduling strategy of networked microgrids in distribution systems
description Abstract Microgrids (MGs) have emerged as a key platform for integrating distributed energy resources into distribution systems. However, a high penetration of renewable energy resources in an MG causes an imbalance frequently between energy generation and load. One solution to this problem is internal energy trading among MGs, where MGs trade (i.e. buy or sell) energy with other MGs in the network. In internal trading, multiple buyer MGs may compete to obtain energy from seller MGs with surplus energy. By contrast, seller MGs also compete to sell their surplus to those confronted with a deficit. Considering this scenario, we propose a novel rank‐based energy scheduling strategy for networked MGs in a distribution system to solve the competition between buyer and seller MGs. The technique for order of preference by similarity to the ideal solution method, which is a multi‐criteria decision‐making approach, is applied to prioritise the MGs. The proposed strategy determines the amount of internal energy to trade for each seller/buyer MG. Different from existing mechanisms, the proposed rank‐based approach evaluates each MG with respect to four criteria: ratio of energy, forecasting accuracy, contribution of supply, and historical performance. The proposed strategy is compared with existing no‐rank‐based scheduling and absolute contribution‐based method. Moreover, the effect of each criterion on the cost of each MG is illustrated by considering and disregarding the criterion in the proposed strategy that demonstrates the effectiveness of the proposed strategy in reducing the cost of MGs according to their rank in the network.
format article
author Nitesh Funde
Sung‐Guk Yoon
author_facet Nitesh Funde
Sung‐Guk Yoon
author_sort Nitesh Funde
title Rank‐based energy scheduling strategy of networked microgrids in distribution systems
title_short Rank‐based energy scheduling strategy of networked microgrids in distribution systems
title_full Rank‐based energy scheduling strategy of networked microgrids in distribution systems
title_fullStr Rank‐based energy scheduling strategy of networked microgrids in distribution systems
title_full_unstemmed Rank‐based energy scheduling strategy of networked microgrids in distribution systems
title_sort rank‐based energy scheduling strategy of networked microgrids in distribution systems
publisher Wiley
publishDate 2022
url https://doaj.org/article/00e0718f427d43ed8e5f200106595bba
work_keys_str_mv AT niteshfunde rankbasedenergyschedulingstrategyofnetworkedmicrogridsindistributionsystems
AT sunggukyoon rankbasedenergyschedulingstrategyofnetworkedmicrogridsindistributionsystems
_version_ 1718392119905746944