Comparison of microbiology and visual outcomes of patients undergoing small-gauge and 20-gauge vitrectomy for endophthalmitis

David RP Almeida,1 Eric K Chin,2,3 Shaival S Shah,3 Benjamin Bakall,3 Karen M Gehrs,3 H Culver Boldt,3 Stephen R Russell,3 James C Folk,3 Vinit B Mahajan3,41VitreoRetinal Surgery PA, Minneapolis, MN, 2Retina Consultants of Southern California, Riverside, CA, 3Vitreoretinal Service, Department of Oph...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Almeida DRP, Chin EK, Shah SS, Bakall B, Gehrs KM, Boldt HC, Russell SR, Folk JC, Mahajan VB
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Dove Medical Press 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/00e72faae1fd43f3a5784cb43f418392
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:00e72faae1fd43f3a5784cb43f418392
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:00e72faae1fd43f3a5784cb43f4183922021-12-02T04:02:54ZComparison of microbiology and visual outcomes of patients undergoing small-gauge and 20-gauge vitrectomy for endophthalmitis1177-5483https://doaj.org/article/00e72faae1fd43f3a5784cb43f4183922016-01-01T00:00:00Zhttps://www.dovepress.com/comparison-of-microbiology-and-visual-outcomes-of-patients-undergoing--peer-reviewed-article-OPTHhttps://doaj.org/toc/1177-5483David RP Almeida,1 Eric K Chin,2,3 Shaival S Shah,3 Benjamin Bakall,3 Karen M Gehrs,3 H Culver Boldt,3 Stephen R Russell,3 James C Folk,3 Vinit B Mahajan3,41VitreoRetinal Surgery PA, Minneapolis, MN, 2Retina Consultants of Southern California, Riverside, CA, 3Vitreoretinal Service, Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, 4Omics Laboratory, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USABackground: The role of pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) for endophthalmitis has evolved over recent decades but the literature is lacking on comparisons between small-gauge and 20-gauge vitrectomy.Objective: To evaluate evolving etiological and microbiological trends in patients undergoing vitrectomy for endophthalmitis and to compare culture-positive rates and visual outcomes between small-gauge (23- and 25-gauge) and 20-gauge instrumentation during vitrectomy for endophthalmitis.Methods: Ten-year retrospective comparative case series and prospective laboratory in vitro testing. Tertiary care academic referral center. Patients who underwent PPV for endophthalmitis between 2003 and 2013. Vitreous biopsies were obtained in all cases. The effect of vitrectomy gauge (20-, 23-, and 25-gauge) and vitreous cutting rate (1,500 and 5,000 cuts per minute) on the viability of bacterial culture was evaluated in an in vitro prospective laboratory investigation.Main outcome measures: Comparison of etiology, microbiology culture-positive rates, and visual outcomes between small-gauge and 20-gauge instrumentation in patients undergoing PPV for infectious endophthalmitis.Results: A total of 61 cases of vitrectomy for endophthalmitis were identified over a 10-year period; of these, 34 were treated with small-gauge (23- and 25-gauge) vitrectomy and 27 were treated with 20-gauge vitrectomy. In the small-gauge group, 12 cases (35.3%) yielded culture-positive results versus 20 cases (74.1%) with culture positivity in the 20-gauge cohort (P=0.002). The most common cause of endophthalmitis was cataract surgery and the most frequently identified organism was coagulase-negative Staphylococci in both groups. There was no significant difference in mean postoperative visual acuities between groups (P=0.33). Etiological trends indicate an increase in endophthalmitis due to intravitreal injection in the small-gauge group (n=9) compared to the 20-gauge group (n=3) (P=0.001). In vitro laboratory testing revealed no significant difference in rates of culture growth for different vitrectomy gauge sizes or vitreous cutting speeds.Conclusion and relevance: Small-gauge vitrectomy for endophthalmitis yields final visual outcomes comparable to 20-gauge instrumentation. A significant difference in culture-positive rates was observed between small-gauge and 20-gauge instrumentation for vitrectomy in endophthalmitis; however, laboratory testing indicates this is not related to either vitreous gauge size or cutter speed. Intravitreal injections are emerging as a common etiology of vitrectomy for endophthalmitis.Keywords: endophthalmitis, vitrectomy, vitreous biopsyAlmeida DRPChin EKShah SSBakall BGehrs KMBoldt HCRussell SRFolk JCMahajan VBDove Medical PressarticleEndophthalmitisVitrectomyOphthalmologyRE1-994ENClinical Ophthalmology, Vol 2016, Iss Issue 1, Pp 167-172 (2016)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic Endophthalmitis
Vitrectomy
Ophthalmology
RE1-994
spellingShingle Endophthalmitis
Vitrectomy
Ophthalmology
RE1-994
Almeida DRP
Chin EK
Shah SS
Bakall B
Gehrs KM
Boldt HC
Russell SR
Folk JC
Mahajan VB
Comparison of microbiology and visual outcomes of patients undergoing small-gauge and 20-gauge vitrectomy for endophthalmitis
description David RP Almeida,1 Eric K Chin,2,3 Shaival S Shah,3 Benjamin Bakall,3 Karen M Gehrs,3 H Culver Boldt,3 Stephen R Russell,3 James C Folk,3 Vinit B Mahajan3,41VitreoRetinal Surgery PA, Minneapolis, MN, 2Retina Consultants of Southern California, Riverside, CA, 3Vitreoretinal Service, Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, 4Omics Laboratory, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USABackground: The role of pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) for endophthalmitis has evolved over recent decades but the literature is lacking on comparisons between small-gauge and 20-gauge vitrectomy.Objective: To evaluate evolving etiological and microbiological trends in patients undergoing vitrectomy for endophthalmitis and to compare culture-positive rates and visual outcomes between small-gauge (23- and 25-gauge) and 20-gauge instrumentation during vitrectomy for endophthalmitis.Methods: Ten-year retrospective comparative case series and prospective laboratory in vitro testing. Tertiary care academic referral center. Patients who underwent PPV for endophthalmitis between 2003 and 2013. Vitreous biopsies were obtained in all cases. The effect of vitrectomy gauge (20-, 23-, and 25-gauge) and vitreous cutting rate (1,500 and 5,000 cuts per minute) on the viability of bacterial culture was evaluated in an in vitro prospective laboratory investigation.Main outcome measures: Comparison of etiology, microbiology culture-positive rates, and visual outcomes between small-gauge and 20-gauge instrumentation in patients undergoing PPV for infectious endophthalmitis.Results: A total of 61 cases of vitrectomy for endophthalmitis were identified over a 10-year period; of these, 34 were treated with small-gauge (23- and 25-gauge) vitrectomy and 27 were treated with 20-gauge vitrectomy. In the small-gauge group, 12 cases (35.3%) yielded culture-positive results versus 20 cases (74.1%) with culture positivity in the 20-gauge cohort (P=0.002). The most common cause of endophthalmitis was cataract surgery and the most frequently identified organism was coagulase-negative Staphylococci in both groups. There was no significant difference in mean postoperative visual acuities between groups (P=0.33). Etiological trends indicate an increase in endophthalmitis due to intravitreal injection in the small-gauge group (n=9) compared to the 20-gauge group (n=3) (P=0.001). In vitro laboratory testing revealed no significant difference in rates of culture growth for different vitrectomy gauge sizes or vitreous cutting speeds.Conclusion and relevance: Small-gauge vitrectomy for endophthalmitis yields final visual outcomes comparable to 20-gauge instrumentation. A significant difference in culture-positive rates was observed between small-gauge and 20-gauge instrumentation for vitrectomy in endophthalmitis; however, laboratory testing indicates this is not related to either vitreous gauge size or cutter speed. Intravitreal injections are emerging as a common etiology of vitrectomy for endophthalmitis.Keywords: endophthalmitis, vitrectomy, vitreous biopsy
format article
author Almeida DRP
Chin EK
Shah SS
Bakall B
Gehrs KM
Boldt HC
Russell SR
Folk JC
Mahajan VB
author_facet Almeida DRP
Chin EK
Shah SS
Bakall B
Gehrs KM
Boldt HC
Russell SR
Folk JC
Mahajan VB
author_sort Almeida DRP
title Comparison of microbiology and visual outcomes of patients undergoing small-gauge and 20-gauge vitrectomy for endophthalmitis
title_short Comparison of microbiology and visual outcomes of patients undergoing small-gauge and 20-gauge vitrectomy for endophthalmitis
title_full Comparison of microbiology and visual outcomes of patients undergoing small-gauge and 20-gauge vitrectomy for endophthalmitis
title_fullStr Comparison of microbiology and visual outcomes of patients undergoing small-gauge and 20-gauge vitrectomy for endophthalmitis
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of microbiology and visual outcomes of patients undergoing small-gauge and 20-gauge vitrectomy for endophthalmitis
title_sort comparison of microbiology and visual outcomes of patients undergoing small-gauge and 20-gauge vitrectomy for endophthalmitis
publisher Dove Medical Press
publishDate 2016
url https://doaj.org/article/00e72faae1fd43f3a5784cb43f418392
work_keys_str_mv AT almeidadrp comparisonofmicrobiologyandvisualoutcomesofpatientsundergoingsmallgaugeand20gaugevitrectomyforendophthalmitis
AT chinek comparisonofmicrobiologyandvisualoutcomesofpatientsundergoingsmallgaugeand20gaugevitrectomyforendophthalmitis
AT shahss comparisonofmicrobiologyandvisualoutcomesofpatientsundergoingsmallgaugeand20gaugevitrectomyforendophthalmitis
AT bakallb comparisonofmicrobiologyandvisualoutcomesofpatientsundergoingsmallgaugeand20gaugevitrectomyforendophthalmitis
AT gehrskm comparisonofmicrobiologyandvisualoutcomesofpatientsundergoingsmallgaugeand20gaugevitrectomyforendophthalmitis
AT boldthc comparisonofmicrobiologyandvisualoutcomesofpatientsundergoingsmallgaugeand20gaugevitrectomyforendophthalmitis
AT russellsr comparisonofmicrobiologyandvisualoutcomesofpatientsundergoingsmallgaugeand20gaugevitrectomyforendophthalmitis
AT folkjc comparisonofmicrobiologyandvisualoutcomesofpatientsundergoingsmallgaugeand20gaugevitrectomyforendophthalmitis
AT mahajanvb comparisonofmicrobiologyandvisualoutcomesofpatientsundergoingsmallgaugeand20gaugevitrectomyforendophthalmitis
_version_ 1718401408990969856