Same habitat types but different use: evidence of context-dependent habitat selection in roe deer across populations
Abstract With the surge of GPS-technology, many studies uncovered space use of mobile animals and shed light on the underlying behavioral mechanisms of habitat selection. Habitat selection and variation in either occurrence or strength of functional responses (i.e. how selection changes with availab...
Guardado en:
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | article |
Lenguaje: | EN |
Publicado: |
Nature Portfolio
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://doaj.org/article/00ecfd00cfff4fe190539b3bc213e090 |
Etiquetas: |
Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
|
id |
oai:doaj.org-article:00ecfd00cfff4fe190539b3bc213e090 |
---|---|
record_format |
dspace |
spelling |
oai:doaj.org-article:00ecfd00cfff4fe190539b3bc213e0902021-12-02T15:08:11ZSame habitat types but different use: evidence of context-dependent habitat selection in roe deer across populations10.1038/s41598-018-23111-02045-2322https://doaj.org/article/00ecfd00cfff4fe190539b3bc213e0902018-03-01T00:00:00Zhttps://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-23111-0https://doaj.org/toc/2045-2322Abstract With the surge of GPS-technology, many studies uncovered space use of mobile animals and shed light on the underlying behavioral mechanisms of habitat selection. Habitat selection and variation in either occurrence or strength of functional responses (i.e. how selection changes with availability) have given new insight into such mechanisms within populations in different ecosystems. However, linking variation in habitat selection to site-specific conditions in different populations facing contrasting environmental conditions but the same habitat type has not yet been investigated. We aimed to fill this knowledge gap by comparing within-home range habitat selection across 61 female roe deer (Capreolus capreolus) during the most critical life history stage in three study areas showing the same habitat types but with different environmental conditions. Female roe deer markedly differed in habitat selection within their home range, both within and among populations. Females facing poor environmental conditions clearly displayed a functional response, whereas females facing rich environmental conditions did not show any functional response. These results demonstrate how the use of a given habitat relative to its availability strongly varies in response to environmental conditions. Our findings highlight that the same habitat composition can lead to very different habitat selection processes across contrasted environments.Gaudry WilliamGaillard Jean-MichelSaïd SoniaBonenfant ChristopheMysterud AtleMorellet NicolasPellerin MarylineCalenge ClémentNature PortfolioarticleMedicineRScienceQENScientific Reports, Vol 8, Iss 1, Pp 1-13 (2018) |
institution |
DOAJ |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
EN |
topic |
Medicine R Science Q |
spellingShingle |
Medicine R Science Q Gaudry William Gaillard Jean-Michel Saïd Sonia Bonenfant Christophe Mysterud Atle Morellet Nicolas Pellerin Maryline Calenge Clément Same habitat types but different use: evidence of context-dependent habitat selection in roe deer across populations |
description |
Abstract With the surge of GPS-technology, many studies uncovered space use of mobile animals and shed light on the underlying behavioral mechanisms of habitat selection. Habitat selection and variation in either occurrence or strength of functional responses (i.e. how selection changes with availability) have given new insight into such mechanisms within populations in different ecosystems. However, linking variation in habitat selection to site-specific conditions in different populations facing contrasting environmental conditions but the same habitat type has not yet been investigated. We aimed to fill this knowledge gap by comparing within-home range habitat selection across 61 female roe deer (Capreolus capreolus) during the most critical life history stage in three study areas showing the same habitat types but with different environmental conditions. Female roe deer markedly differed in habitat selection within their home range, both within and among populations. Females facing poor environmental conditions clearly displayed a functional response, whereas females facing rich environmental conditions did not show any functional response. These results demonstrate how the use of a given habitat relative to its availability strongly varies in response to environmental conditions. Our findings highlight that the same habitat composition can lead to very different habitat selection processes across contrasted environments. |
format |
article |
author |
Gaudry William Gaillard Jean-Michel Saïd Sonia Bonenfant Christophe Mysterud Atle Morellet Nicolas Pellerin Maryline Calenge Clément |
author_facet |
Gaudry William Gaillard Jean-Michel Saïd Sonia Bonenfant Christophe Mysterud Atle Morellet Nicolas Pellerin Maryline Calenge Clément |
author_sort |
Gaudry William |
title |
Same habitat types but different use: evidence of context-dependent habitat selection in roe deer across populations |
title_short |
Same habitat types but different use: evidence of context-dependent habitat selection in roe deer across populations |
title_full |
Same habitat types but different use: evidence of context-dependent habitat selection in roe deer across populations |
title_fullStr |
Same habitat types but different use: evidence of context-dependent habitat selection in roe deer across populations |
title_full_unstemmed |
Same habitat types but different use: evidence of context-dependent habitat selection in roe deer across populations |
title_sort |
same habitat types but different use: evidence of context-dependent habitat selection in roe deer across populations |
publisher |
Nature Portfolio |
publishDate |
2018 |
url |
https://doaj.org/article/00ecfd00cfff4fe190539b3bc213e090 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT gaudrywilliam samehabitattypesbutdifferentuseevidenceofcontextdependenthabitatselectioninroedeeracrosspopulations AT gaillardjeanmichel samehabitattypesbutdifferentuseevidenceofcontextdependenthabitatselectioninroedeeracrosspopulations AT saidsonia samehabitattypesbutdifferentuseevidenceofcontextdependenthabitatselectioninroedeeracrosspopulations AT bonenfantchristophe samehabitattypesbutdifferentuseevidenceofcontextdependenthabitatselectioninroedeeracrosspopulations AT mysterudatle samehabitattypesbutdifferentuseevidenceofcontextdependenthabitatselectioninroedeeracrosspopulations AT morelletnicolas samehabitattypesbutdifferentuseevidenceofcontextdependenthabitatselectioninroedeeracrosspopulations AT pellerinmaryline samehabitattypesbutdifferentuseevidenceofcontextdependenthabitatselectioninroedeeracrosspopulations AT calengeclement samehabitattypesbutdifferentuseevidenceofcontextdependenthabitatselectioninroedeeracrosspopulations |
_version_ |
1718388230996361216 |