Localized Defect Detection from Spatially Mapped, In-Situ Process Data With Machine Learning

In powder bed fusion additive manufacturing, machines are often equipped with in-situ sensors to monitor the build environment as well as machine actuators and subsystems. The data from these sensors offer rich information about the consistency of the fabrication process within a build and across bu...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: William Halsey, Derek Rose, Luke Scime, Ryan Dehoff, Vincent Paquit
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/00ef93f7d9dd4865b96ad70a73562665
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:00ef93f7d9dd4865b96ad70a73562665
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:00ef93f7d9dd4865b96ad70a735626652021-11-15T07:00:37ZLocalized Defect Detection from Spatially Mapped, In-Situ Process Data With Machine Learning2297-307910.3389/fmech.2021.767444https://doaj.org/article/00ef93f7d9dd4865b96ad70a735626652021-11-01T00:00:00Zhttps://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fmech.2021.767444/fullhttps://doaj.org/toc/2297-3079In powder bed fusion additive manufacturing, machines are often equipped with in-situ sensors to monitor the build environment as well as machine actuators and subsystems. The data from these sensors offer rich information about the consistency of the fabrication process within a build and across builds. This information may be used for process monitoring and defect detection; however, little has been done to leverage this data from the machines for more than just coarse-grained process monitoring. In this work we demonstrate how these inherently temporal data may be mapped spatially by leveraging scan path information. We then train a XGBoost machine learning model to predict localized defects—specifically soot–using only the mapped process data of builds from a laser powder bed fusion process as input features. The XGBoost model offers a feature importance metric that will help to elucidate possible relationships between the process data and observed defects. Finally, we analyze the model performance spatially and rationalize areas of greater and lesser performance.William HalseyWilliam HalseyDerek RoseLuke ScimeLuke ScimeRyan DehoffRyan DehoffVincent PaquitVincent PaquitFrontiers Media S.A.articleadditive manufacturing (3D printing)machine learningspatio - temporal analysisexplainable AIprocess-structure-property linkagedefect detectionMechanical engineering and machineryTJ1-1570ENFrontiers in Mechanical Engineering, Vol 7 (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic additive manufacturing (3D printing)
machine learning
spatio - temporal analysis
explainable AI
process-structure-property linkage
defect detection
Mechanical engineering and machinery
TJ1-1570
spellingShingle additive manufacturing (3D printing)
machine learning
spatio - temporal analysis
explainable AI
process-structure-property linkage
defect detection
Mechanical engineering and machinery
TJ1-1570
William Halsey
William Halsey
Derek Rose
Luke Scime
Luke Scime
Ryan Dehoff
Ryan Dehoff
Vincent Paquit
Vincent Paquit
Localized Defect Detection from Spatially Mapped, In-Situ Process Data With Machine Learning
description In powder bed fusion additive manufacturing, machines are often equipped with in-situ sensors to monitor the build environment as well as machine actuators and subsystems. The data from these sensors offer rich information about the consistency of the fabrication process within a build and across builds. This information may be used for process monitoring and defect detection; however, little has been done to leverage this data from the machines for more than just coarse-grained process monitoring. In this work we demonstrate how these inherently temporal data may be mapped spatially by leveraging scan path information. We then train a XGBoost machine learning model to predict localized defects—specifically soot–using only the mapped process data of builds from a laser powder bed fusion process as input features. The XGBoost model offers a feature importance metric that will help to elucidate possible relationships between the process data and observed defects. Finally, we analyze the model performance spatially and rationalize areas of greater and lesser performance.
format article
author William Halsey
William Halsey
Derek Rose
Luke Scime
Luke Scime
Ryan Dehoff
Ryan Dehoff
Vincent Paquit
Vincent Paquit
author_facet William Halsey
William Halsey
Derek Rose
Luke Scime
Luke Scime
Ryan Dehoff
Ryan Dehoff
Vincent Paquit
Vincent Paquit
author_sort William Halsey
title Localized Defect Detection from Spatially Mapped, In-Situ Process Data With Machine Learning
title_short Localized Defect Detection from Spatially Mapped, In-Situ Process Data With Machine Learning
title_full Localized Defect Detection from Spatially Mapped, In-Situ Process Data With Machine Learning
title_fullStr Localized Defect Detection from Spatially Mapped, In-Situ Process Data With Machine Learning
title_full_unstemmed Localized Defect Detection from Spatially Mapped, In-Situ Process Data With Machine Learning
title_sort localized defect detection from spatially mapped, in-situ process data with machine learning
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/00ef93f7d9dd4865b96ad70a73562665
work_keys_str_mv AT williamhalsey localizeddefectdetectionfromspatiallymappedinsituprocessdatawithmachinelearning
AT williamhalsey localizeddefectdetectionfromspatiallymappedinsituprocessdatawithmachinelearning
AT derekrose localizeddefectdetectionfromspatiallymappedinsituprocessdatawithmachinelearning
AT lukescime localizeddefectdetectionfromspatiallymappedinsituprocessdatawithmachinelearning
AT lukescime localizeddefectdetectionfromspatiallymappedinsituprocessdatawithmachinelearning
AT ryandehoff localizeddefectdetectionfromspatiallymappedinsituprocessdatawithmachinelearning
AT ryandehoff localizeddefectdetectionfromspatiallymappedinsituprocessdatawithmachinelearning
AT vincentpaquit localizeddefectdetectionfromspatiallymappedinsituprocessdatawithmachinelearning
AT vincentpaquit localizeddefectdetectionfromspatiallymappedinsituprocessdatawithmachinelearning
_version_ 1718428473814417408