Investigating Behavior of Six Methods for Sediment Transport Capacity Estimation of Spatial-Temporal Soil Erosion

Estimation of sediment transport capacity (STC) plays a crucial role in simulating soil erosion using any physics-based models. In this research, we aim to investigate the pros and cons of six popular STC methods (namely, Shear velocity, Kilinc-Richardson (KR), Effective stream power, Slope and unit...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Linh Nguyen Van, Xuan-Hien Le, Giang V. Nguyen, Minho Yeon, Sungho Jung, Giha Lee
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: MDPI AG 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/011e14d84e0b41c58a84c165bd7314f1
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:011e14d84e0b41c58a84c165bd7314f1
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:011e14d84e0b41c58a84c165bd7314f12021-11-11T19:55:52ZInvestigating Behavior of Six Methods for Sediment Transport Capacity Estimation of Spatial-Temporal Soil Erosion10.3390/w132130542073-4441https://doaj.org/article/011e14d84e0b41c58a84c165bd7314f12021-11-01T00:00:00Zhttps://www.mdpi.com/2073-4441/13/21/3054https://doaj.org/toc/2073-4441Estimation of sediment transport capacity (STC) plays a crucial role in simulating soil erosion using any physics-based models. In this research, we aim to investigate the pros and cons of six popular STC methods (namely, Shear velocity, Kilinc-Richardson (KR), Effective stream power, Slope and unit discharge, Englund-Hansen (EH), and Unit stream power) for soil erosion/deposition simulation at watershed scales. An in-depth analysis was performed using the selected STC methods integrated into the Grid Surface Subsurface Hydrologic Analysis model for investigating the changes in morphology at spatial-temporal scales at the Cheoncheon watershed, South Korea, over three storm events. Conclusions were drawn as follows. (1) Due to the ability of the KR and EH methods to include an additional parameter (i.e., erodibility coefficient), they outperformed others by producing more accurate simulation results of sediment concentration predictions. The KR method also proved to be superior to the EH method when it showed a more suitable for sediment concentration simulations with a wide range of sediment size and forcing magnitude. (2) We further selected 2 STC methods among the 6 methods to deeply explore the spatial distribution of erosion/deposition. The overall results were more agreeable. For instance, the phenomenon of erosion mainly occurred upstream of watersheds with steep slopes and unbalanced initial sediment concentrations, whereas deposition typically appeared at locations with flat terrain (or along the mainstream). The EH method demonstrated the influence of topography (e.g., gradient slope) on accretionary erosion/deposition results more significantly than the KR method. The obtained results contribute a new understanding of rainfall-sediment-runoff processes and provide fundamental plans for soil conservation in watersheds.Linh Nguyen VanXuan-Hien LeGiang V. NguyenMinho YeonSungho JungGiha LeeMDPI AGarticlesediment transport capacityrainfall-runofferosiondepositionGSSHAHydraulic engineeringTC1-978Water supply for domestic and industrial purposesTD201-500ENWater, Vol 13, Iss 3054, p 3054 (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic sediment transport capacity
rainfall-runoff
erosion
deposition
GSSHA
Hydraulic engineering
TC1-978
Water supply for domestic and industrial purposes
TD201-500
spellingShingle sediment transport capacity
rainfall-runoff
erosion
deposition
GSSHA
Hydraulic engineering
TC1-978
Water supply for domestic and industrial purposes
TD201-500
Linh Nguyen Van
Xuan-Hien Le
Giang V. Nguyen
Minho Yeon
Sungho Jung
Giha Lee
Investigating Behavior of Six Methods for Sediment Transport Capacity Estimation of Spatial-Temporal Soil Erosion
description Estimation of sediment transport capacity (STC) plays a crucial role in simulating soil erosion using any physics-based models. In this research, we aim to investigate the pros and cons of six popular STC methods (namely, Shear velocity, Kilinc-Richardson (KR), Effective stream power, Slope and unit discharge, Englund-Hansen (EH), and Unit stream power) for soil erosion/deposition simulation at watershed scales. An in-depth analysis was performed using the selected STC methods integrated into the Grid Surface Subsurface Hydrologic Analysis model for investigating the changes in morphology at spatial-temporal scales at the Cheoncheon watershed, South Korea, over three storm events. Conclusions were drawn as follows. (1) Due to the ability of the KR and EH methods to include an additional parameter (i.e., erodibility coefficient), they outperformed others by producing more accurate simulation results of sediment concentration predictions. The KR method also proved to be superior to the EH method when it showed a more suitable for sediment concentration simulations with a wide range of sediment size and forcing magnitude. (2) We further selected 2 STC methods among the 6 methods to deeply explore the spatial distribution of erosion/deposition. The overall results were more agreeable. For instance, the phenomenon of erosion mainly occurred upstream of watersheds with steep slopes and unbalanced initial sediment concentrations, whereas deposition typically appeared at locations with flat terrain (or along the mainstream). The EH method demonstrated the influence of topography (e.g., gradient slope) on accretionary erosion/deposition results more significantly than the KR method. The obtained results contribute a new understanding of rainfall-sediment-runoff processes and provide fundamental plans for soil conservation in watersheds.
format article
author Linh Nguyen Van
Xuan-Hien Le
Giang V. Nguyen
Minho Yeon
Sungho Jung
Giha Lee
author_facet Linh Nguyen Van
Xuan-Hien Le
Giang V. Nguyen
Minho Yeon
Sungho Jung
Giha Lee
author_sort Linh Nguyen Van
title Investigating Behavior of Six Methods for Sediment Transport Capacity Estimation of Spatial-Temporal Soil Erosion
title_short Investigating Behavior of Six Methods for Sediment Transport Capacity Estimation of Spatial-Temporal Soil Erosion
title_full Investigating Behavior of Six Methods for Sediment Transport Capacity Estimation of Spatial-Temporal Soil Erosion
title_fullStr Investigating Behavior of Six Methods for Sediment Transport Capacity Estimation of Spatial-Temporal Soil Erosion
title_full_unstemmed Investigating Behavior of Six Methods for Sediment Transport Capacity Estimation of Spatial-Temporal Soil Erosion
title_sort investigating behavior of six methods for sediment transport capacity estimation of spatial-temporal soil erosion
publisher MDPI AG
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/011e14d84e0b41c58a84c165bd7314f1
work_keys_str_mv AT linhnguyenvan investigatingbehaviorofsixmethodsforsedimenttransportcapacityestimationofspatialtemporalsoilerosion
AT xuanhienle investigatingbehaviorofsixmethodsforsedimenttransportcapacityestimationofspatialtemporalsoilerosion
AT giangvnguyen investigatingbehaviorofsixmethodsforsedimenttransportcapacityestimationofspatialtemporalsoilerosion
AT minhoyeon investigatingbehaviorofsixmethodsforsedimenttransportcapacityestimationofspatialtemporalsoilerosion
AT sunghojung investigatingbehaviorofsixmethodsforsedimenttransportcapacityestimationofspatialtemporalsoilerosion
AT gihalee investigatingbehaviorofsixmethodsforsedimenttransportcapacityestimationofspatialtemporalsoilerosion
_version_ 1718431328350765056