Improving Deep Brain Stimulation Electrode Performance in vivo Through Use of Conductive Hydrogel Coatings

Active implantable neurological devices like deep brain stimulators have been used over the past few decades to treat movement disorders such as those in people with Parkinson’s disease and more recently, in psychiatric conditions like obsessive compulsive disorder. Electrode-tissue interfaces that...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tomoko Hyakumura, Ulises Aregueta-Robles, Wenlu Duan, Joel Villalobos, Wendy K. Adams, Laura Poole-Warren, James B. Fallon
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/0134d388bd7340dc9d132e0b87dc692d
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:0134d388bd7340dc9d132e0b87dc692d
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:0134d388bd7340dc9d132e0b87dc692d2021-11-05T10:42:24ZImproving Deep Brain Stimulation Electrode Performance in vivo Through Use of Conductive Hydrogel Coatings1662-453X10.3389/fnins.2021.761525https://doaj.org/article/0134d388bd7340dc9d132e0b87dc692d2021-11-01T00:00:00Zhttps://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fnins.2021.761525/fullhttps://doaj.org/toc/1662-453XActive implantable neurological devices like deep brain stimulators have been used over the past few decades to treat movement disorders such as those in people with Parkinson’s disease and more recently, in psychiatric conditions like obsessive compulsive disorder. Electrode-tissue interfaces that support safe and effective targeting of specific brain regions are critical to success of these devices. Development of directional electrodes that activate smaller volumes of brain tissue requires electrodes to operate safely with higher charge densities. Coatings such as conductive hydrogels (CHs) provide lower impedances and higher charge injection limits (CILs) than standard platinum electrodes and support safer application of smaller electrode sizes. The aim of this study was to examine the chronic in vivo performance of a new low swelling CH coating that supports higher safe charge densities than traditional platinum electrodes. A range of hydrogel blends were engineered and their swelling and electrical performance compared. Electrochemical performance and stability of high and low swelling formulations were compared during insertion into a model brain in vitro and the formulation with lower swelling characteristics was chosen for the in vivo study. CH-coated or uncoated Pt electrode arrays were implanted into the brains of 14 rats, and their electrochemical performance was tested weekly for 8 weeks. Tissue response and neural survival was assessed histologically following electrode array removal. CH coating resulted in significantly lower voltage transient impedance, higher CIL, lower electrochemical impedance spectroscopy, and higher charge storage capacity compared to uncoated Pt electrodes in vivo, and this advantage was maintained over the 8-week implantation. There was no significant difference in evoked potential thresholds, signal-to-noise ratio, tissue response or neural survival between CH-coated and uncoated Pt groups. The significant electrochemical advantage and stability of CH coating in the brain supports the suitability of this coating technology for future development of smaller, higher fidelity electrode arrays with higher charge density requirement.Tomoko HyakumuraTomoko HyakumuraUlises Aregueta-RoblesWenlu DuanJoel VillalobosJoel VillalobosWendy K. AdamsLaura Poole-WarrenLaura Poole-WarrenJames B. FallonJames B. FallonFrontiers Media S.A.articleconductive hydrogeldeep brain stimulationneural stimulationelectrode coatingtissue responseelectrical propertiesNeurosciences. Biological psychiatry. NeuropsychiatryRC321-571ENFrontiers in Neuroscience, Vol 15 (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic conductive hydrogel
deep brain stimulation
neural stimulation
electrode coating
tissue response
electrical properties
Neurosciences. Biological psychiatry. Neuropsychiatry
RC321-571
spellingShingle conductive hydrogel
deep brain stimulation
neural stimulation
electrode coating
tissue response
electrical properties
Neurosciences. Biological psychiatry. Neuropsychiatry
RC321-571
Tomoko Hyakumura
Tomoko Hyakumura
Ulises Aregueta-Robles
Wenlu Duan
Joel Villalobos
Joel Villalobos
Wendy K. Adams
Laura Poole-Warren
Laura Poole-Warren
James B. Fallon
James B. Fallon
Improving Deep Brain Stimulation Electrode Performance in vivo Through Use of Conductive Hydrogel Coatings
description Active implantable neurological devices like deep brain stimulators have been used over the past few decades to treat movement disorders such as those in people with Parkinson’s disease and more recently, in psychiatric conditions like obsessive compulsive disorder. Electrode-tissue interfaces that support safe and effective targeting of specific brain regions are critical to success of these devices. Development of directional electrodes that activate smaller volumes of brain tissue requires electrodes to operate safely with higher charge densities. Coatings such as conductive hydrogels (CHs) provide lower impedances and higher charge injection limits (CILs) than standard platinum electrodes and support safer application of smaller electrode sizes. The aim of this study was to examine the chronic in vivo performance of a new low swelling CH coating that supports higher safe charge densities than traditional platinum electrodes. A range of hydrogel blends were engineered and their swelling and electrical performance compared. Electrochemical performance and stability of high and low swelling formulations were compared during insertion into a model brain in vitro and the formulation with lower swelling characteristics was chosen for the in vivo study. CH-coated or uncoated Pt electrode arrays were implanted into the brains of 14 rats, and their electrochemical performance was tested weekly for 8 weeks. Tissue response and neural survival was assessed histologically following electrode array removal. CH coating resulted in significantly lower voltage transient impedance, higher CIL, lower electrochemical impedance spectroscopy, and higher charge storage capacity compared to uncoated Pt electrodes in vivo, and this advantage was maintained over the 8-week implantation. There was no significant difference in evoked potential thresholds, signal-to-noise ratio, tissue response or neural survival between CH-coated and uncoated Pt groups. The significant electrochemical advantage and stability of CH coating in the brain supports the suitability of this coating technology for future development of smaller, higher fidelity electrode arrays with higher charge density requirement.
format article
author Tomoko Hyakumura
Tomoko Hyakumura
Ulises Aregueta-Robles
Wenlu Duan
Joel Villalobos
Joel Villalobos
Wendy K. Adams
Laura Poole-Warren
Laura Poole-Warren
James B. Fallon
James B. Fallon
author_facet Tomoko Hyakumura
Tomoko Hyakumura
Ulises Aregueta-Robles
Wenlu Duan
Joel Villalobos
Joel Villalobos
Wendy K. Adams
Laura Poole-Warren
Laura Poole-Warren
James B. Fallon
James B. Fallon
author_sort Tomoko Hyakumura
title Improving Deep Brain Stimulation Electrode Performance in vivo Through Use of Conductive Hydrogel Coatings
title_short Improving Deep Brain Stimulation Electrode Performance in vivo Through Use of Conductive Hydrogel Coatings
title_full Improving Deep Brain Stimulation Electrode Performance in vivo Through Use of Conductive Hydrogel Coatings
title_fullStr Improving Deep Brain Stimulation Electrode Performance in vivo Through Use of Conductive Hydrogel Coatings
title_full_unstemmed Improving Deep Brain Stimulation Electrode Performance in vivo Through Use of Conductive Hydrogel Coatings
title_sort improving deep brain stimulation electrode performance in vivo through use of conductive hydrogel coatings
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/0134d388bd7340dc9d132e0b87dc692d
work_keys_str_mv AT tomokohyakumura improvingdeepbrainstimulationelectrodeperformanceinvivothroughuseofconductivehydrogelcoatings
AT tomokohyakumura improvingdeepbrainstimulationelectrodeperformanceinvivothroughuseofconductivehydrogelcoatings
AT ulisesareguetarobles improvingdeepbrainstimulationelectrodeperformanceinvivothroughuseofconductivehydrogelcoatings
AT wenluduan improvingdeepbrainstimulationelectrodeperformanceinvivothroughuseofconductivehydrogelcoatings
AT joelvillalobos improvingdeepbrainstimulationelectrodeperformanceinvivothroughuseofconductivehydrogelcoatings
AT joelvillalobos improvingdeepbrainstimulationelectrodeperformanceinvivothroughuseofconductivehydrogelcoatings
AT wendykadams improvingdeepbrainstimulationelectrodeperformanceinvivothroughuseofconductivehydrogelcoatings
AT laurapoolewarren improvingdeepbrainstimulationelectrodeperformanceinvivothroughuseofconductivehydrogelcoatings
AT laurapoolewarren improvingdeepbrainstimulationelectrodeperformanceinvivothroughuseofconductivehydrogelcoatings
AT jamesbfallon improvingdeepbrainstimulationelectrodeperformanceinvivothroughuseofconductivehydrogelcoatings
AT jamesbfallon improvingdeepbrainstimulationelectrodeperformanceinvivothroughuseofconductivehydrogelcoatings
_version_ 1718444266622025728