Measuring Urban Low-Carbon Sustainability in Four Chinese Cities

Practices and research on measuring traditionally urban sustainability abound, therefore the challenge now is related to how the urban carbon issues are included into current measuring methods, thus there is a need to develop methods for measuring urban low-carbon sustainability. In this paper, a si...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mingshun Zhang, Yitong Yang, Chun Xia-Bauer
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: MDPI AG 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/0157acddffa644bbab2016767a06b7c6
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:0157acddffa644bbab2016767a06b7c6
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:0157acddffa644bbab2016767a06b7c62021-11-11T19:50:04ZMeasuring Urban Low-Carbon Sustainability in Four Chinese Cities10.3390/su1321122812071-1050https://doaj.org/article/0157acddffa644bbab2016767a06b7c62021-11-01T00:00:00Zhttps://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/21/12281https://doaj.org/toc/2071-1050Practices and research on measuring traditionally urban sustainability abound, therefore the challenge now is related to how the urban carbon issues are included into current measuring methods, thus there is a need to develop methods for measuring urban low-carbon sustainability. In this paper, a simple method, which is based on low-carbon sustainability index, is developed. The overall urban low-carbon sustainability index is the weighted sum of 11 single indices, and each single index is defined as the indicator assessing the development level against the baseline. The baseline is often the criteria or the minimum requirement of low-carbon sustainability. Case studies in four Chinese cities have put this method into practice, and the results show that all four selected cities fail to pass the testing of sensible low-carbon sustainability rule and they are all in weakly low-carbon sustainable development. Although the four cities have made great progress in their capacity building on pollution control and their capacities on wastewater treatment, main pollutants’ removal and household and hazardous wastes treatment are enough to meet the needs of local development, they are all facing the great challenges on using of sustainable energy, offsetting of CO<sub>2</sub> emissions and adoptions of nature-based solutions. The method developed by this research is a useful tool for decision makers identifying whether the local development is not on a low-carbon sustainable path.Mingshun ZhangYitong YangChun Xia-BauerMDPI AGarticleurban sustainabilitylow-carbon cityurban environmental managementurban ChinaEnvironmental effects of industries and plantsTD194-195Renewable energy sourcesTJ807-830Environmental sciencesGE1-350ENSustainability, Vol 13, Iss 12281, p 12281 (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic urban sustainability
low-carbon city
urban environmental management
urban China
Environmental effects of industries and plants
TD194-195
Renewable energy sources
TJ807-830
Environmental sciences
GE1-350
spellingShingle urban sustainability
low-carbon city
urban environmental management
urban China
Environmental effects of industries and plants
TD194-195
Renewable energy sources
TJ807-830
Environmental sciences
GE1-350
Mingshun Zhang
Yitong Yang
Chun Xia-Bauer
Measuring Urban Low-Carbon Sustainability in Four Chinese Cities
description Practices and research on measuring traditionally urban sustainability abound, therefore the challenge now is related to how the urban carbon issues are included into current measuring methods, thus there is a need to develop methods for measuring urban low-carbon sustainability. In this paper, a simple method, which is based on low-carbon sustainability index, is developed. The overall urban low-carbon sustainability index is the weighted sum of 11 single indices, and each single index is defined as the indicator assessing the development level against the baseline. The baseline is often the criteria or the minimum requirement of low-carbon sustainability. Case studies in four Chinese cities have put this method into practice, and the results show that all four selected cities fail to pass the testing of sensible low-carbon sustainability rule and they are all in weakly low-carbon sustainable development. Although the four cities have made great progress in their capacity building on pollution control and their capacities on wastewater treatment, main pollutants’ removal and household and hazardous wastes treatment are enough to meet the needs of local development, they are all facing the great challenges on using of sustainable energy, offsetting of CO<sub>2</sub> emissions and adoptions of nature-based solutions. The method developed by this research is a useful tool for decision makers identifying whether the local development is not on a low-carbon sustainable path.
format article
author Mingshun Zhang
Yitong Yang
Chun Xia-Bauer
author_facet Mingshun Zhang
Yitong Yang
Chun Xia-Bauer
author_sort Mingshun Zhang
title Measuring Urban Low-Carbon Sustainability in Four Chinese Cities
title_short Measuring Urban Low-Carbon Sustainability in Four Chinese Cities
title_full Measuring Urban Low-Carbon Sustainability in Four Chinese Cities
title_fullStr Measuring Urban Low-Carbon Sustainability in Four Chinese Cities
title_full_unstemmed Measuring Urban Low-Carbon Sustainability in Four Chinese Cities
title_sort measuring urban low-carbon sustainability in four chinese cities
publisher MDPI AG
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/0157acddffa644bbab2016767a06b7c6
work_keys_str_mv AT mingshunzhang measuringurbanlowcarbonsustainabilityinfourchinesecities
AT yitongyang measuringurbanlowcarbonsustainabilityinfourchinesecities
AT chunxiabauer measuringurbanlowcarbonsustainabilityinfourchinesecities
_version_ 1718431387896250368