Comparison between bilateral implantation of a trifocal intraocular lens and blended implantation of two bifocal intraocular lenses

César Vilar,1,2 Wilson Takashi Hida,1–3 André Lins de Medeiros,1,2 Klayny Rafaella Pereira Magalhães,2 Patrick Frensel de Moraes Tzelikis,1,2 Mario Augusto Pereira Dias Chaves,2,4 Antônio Francisco Pimenta Motta,2,3 Pedro Carlos Carricondo,1&n...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Vilar C, Hida WT, Medeiros AL, Magalhães KRP, Tzelikis PF, Chaves MAPD, Motta, AFP, Carricondo PC, Alves MR, Nosé W
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Dove Medical Press 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/01c043e50dbb41a08c724e87f217a8a4
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:01c043e50dbb41a08c724e87f217a8a4
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:01c043e50dbb41a08c724e87f217a8a42021-12-02T00:41:09ZComparison between bilateral implantation of a trifocal intraocular lens and blended implantation of two bifocal intraocular lenses1177-5483https://doaj.org/article/01c043e50dbb41a08c724e87f217a8a42017-08-01T00:00:00Zhttps://www.dovepress.com/comparison-between-bilateral-implantation-of-a-trifocal-intraocular-le-peer-reviewed-article-OPTHhttps://doaj.org/toc/1177-5483César Vilar,1,2 Wilson Takashi Hida,1–3 André Lins de Medeiros,1,2 Klayny Rafaella Pereira Magalhães,2 Patrick Frensel de Moraes Tzelikis,1,2 Mario Augusto Pereira Dias Chaves,2,4 Antônio Francisco Pimenta Motta,2,3 Pedro Carlos Carricondo,1–3 Milton Ruiz Alves,3 Walton Nosé5 1Cataract Division, Brasília Ophthalmologic Hospital (HOB), Brasília-DF, Brazil; 2Renato Ambrosio Ophthalmologic Research Center (CEORA), 3Ophthalmology Department, São Paulo University – USP, São Paulo-SP, Brazil; 4Cataract Division, ProVisão, João Pessoa-PB, Brazil; 5Ophthalmology Department, Paulista Medical School – UNIFESP, São Paulo-SP, Brazil Purpose: To compare visual outcomes and performance between bilateral implantation of a diffractive trifocal intraocular lens (IOL) Acrysof®PanOptix® TFNT00 and blended implantation of two different near add power bifocal IOLs: Acrysof® Restor® SV25T0 in dominant eye and Acrysof® Restor® SN6AD1 in the nondominant eye.Methods: This prospective, nonrandomized, consecutive and comparative study assessed 20 patients (40 eyes) who had bilateral cataract surgery performed using the IOLs described. Patients were divided into groups, bilateral trifocal implant and blended implant. Evaluation included measurement of binocular uncorrected and corrected distance visual acuity at 4 m (UDVA, CDVA) and uncorrected intermediate (60 cm) and near (at 40 cm) visual acuity; contrast sensitivity (CS) and visual defocus curve.Results: Postoperative CDVA comparison showed no statistical significance between groups. UDVA was significantly better in the trifocal groups. Under photopic conditions, the trifocal group had better CS in higher frequencies with and without glare. The binocular defocus curve demonstrated a trifocal behavior in both groups, with the bilateral trifocal group exhibiting better performance for intermediate vision.Conclusion: Both lens combinations were able to provide good near, intermediate and distance vision, with the trifocal group showing significantly better performance at intermediate distances and better CS under photopic conditions. Keywords: trifocal, blend, cataract surgery, IOL, multifocal, presbyopiaVilar CHida WTMedeiros ALMagalhães KRPTzelikis PFChaves MAPDMotta, AFPCarricondo PCAlves MRNosé WDove Medical Pressarticletrifocalblendcataract surgeryIOL.OphthalmologyRE1-994ENClinical Ophthalmology, Vol Volume 11, Pp 1393-1397 (2017)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic trifocal
blend
cataract surgery
IOL.
Ophthalmology
RE1-994
spellingShingle trifocal
blend
cataract surgery
IOL.
Ophthalmology
RE1-994
Vilar C
Hida WT
Medeiros AL
Magalhães KRP
Tzelikis PF
Chaves MAPD
Motta, AFP
Carricondo PC
Alves MR
Nosé W
Comparison between bilateral implantation of a trifocal intraocular lens and blended implantation of two bifocal intraocular lenses
description César Vilar,1,2 Wilson Takashi Hida,1–3 André Lins de Medeiros,1,2 Klayny Rafaella Pereira Magalhães,2 Patrick Frensel de Moraes Tzelikis,1,2 Mario Augusto Pereira Dias Chaves,2,4 Antônio Francisco Pimenta Motta,2,3 Pedro Carlos Carricondo,1–3 Milton Ruiz Alves,3 Walton Nosé5 1Cataract Division, Brasília Ophthalmologic Hospital (HOB), Brasília-DF, Brazil; 2Renato Ambrosio Ophthalmologic Research Center (CEORA), 3Ophthalmology Department, São Paulo University – USP, São Paulo-SP, Brazil; 4Cataract Division, ProVisão, João Pessoa-PB, Brazil; 5Ophthalmology Department, Paulista Medical School – UNIFESP, São Paulo-SP, Brazil Purpose: To compare visual outcomes and performance between bilateral implantation of a diffractive trifocal intraocular lens (IOL) Acrysof®PanOptix® TFNT00 and blended implantation of two different near add power bifocal IOLs: Acrysof® Restor® SV25T0 in dominant eye and Acrysof® Restor® SN6AD1 in the nondominant eye.Methods: This prospective, nonrandomized, consecutive and comparative study assessed 20 patients (40 eyes) who had bilateral cataract surgery performed using the IOLs described. Patients were divided into groups, bilateral trifocal implant and blended implant. Evaluation included measurement of binocular uncorrected and corrected distance visual acuity at 4 m (UDVA, CDVA) and uncorrected intermediate (60 cm) and near (at 40 cm) visual acuity; contrast sensitivity (CS) and visual defocus curve.Results: Postoperative CDVA comparison showed no statistical significance between groups. UDVA was significantly better in the trifocal groups. Under photopic conditions, the trifocal group had better CS in higher frequencies with and without glare. The binocular defocus curve demonstrated a trifocal behavior in both groups, with the bilateral trifocal group exhibiting better performance for intermediate vision.Conclusion: Both lens combinations were able to provide good near, intermediate and distance vision, with the trifocal group showing significantly better performance at intermediate distances and better CS under photopic conditions. Keywords: trifocal, blend, cataract surgery, IOL, multifocal, presbyopia
format article
author Vilar C
Hida WT
Medeiros AL
Magalhães KRP
Tzelikis PF
Chaves MAPD
Motta, AFP
Carricondo PC
Alves MR
Nosé W
author_facet Vilar C
Hida WT
Medeiros AL
Magalhães KRP
Tzelikis PF
Chaves MAPD
Motta, AFP
Carricondo PC
Alves MR
Nosé W
author_sort Vilar C
title Comparison between bilateral implantation of a trifocal intraocular lens and blended implantation of two bifocal intraocular lenses
title_short Comparison between bilateral implantation of a trifocal intraocular lens and blended implantation of two bifocal intraocular lenses
title_full Comparison between bilateral implantation of a trifocal intraocular lens and blended implantation of two bifocal intraocular lenses
title_fullStr Comparison between bilateral implantation of a trifocal intraocular lens and blended implantation of two bifocal intraocular lenses
title_full_unstemmed Comparison between bilateral implantation of a trifocal intraocular lens and blended implantation of two bifocal intraocular lenses
title_sort comparison between bilateral implantation of a trifocal intraocular lens and blended implantation of two bifocal intraocular lenses
publisher Dove Medical Press
publishDate 2017
url https://doaj.org/article/01c043e50dbb41a08c724e87f217a8a4
work_keys_str_mv AT vilarc comparisonbetweenbilateralimplantationofatrifocalintraocularlensandblendedimplantationoftwobifocalintraocularlenses
AT hidawt comparisonbetweenbilateralimplantationofatrifocalintraocularlensandblendedimplantationoftwobifocalintraocularlenses
AT medeirosal comparisonbetweenbilateralimplantationofatrifocalintraocularlensandblendedimplantationoftwobifocalintraocularlenses
AT magalhaeskrp comparisonbetweenbilateralimplantationofatrifocalintraocularlensandblendedimplantationoftwobifocalintraocularlenses
AT tzelikispf comparisonbetweenbilateralimplantationofatrifocalintraocularlensandblendedimplantationoftwobifocalintraocularlenses
AT chavesmapd comparisonbetweenbilateralimplantationofatrifocalintraocularlensandblendedimplantationoftwobifocalintraocularlenses
AT mottaafp comparisonbetweenbilateralimplantationofatrifocalintraocularlensandblendedimplantationoftwobifocalintraocularlenses
AT carricondopc comparisonbetweenbilateralimplantationofatrifocalintraocularlensandblendedimplantationoftwobifocalintraocularlenses
AT alvesmr comparisonbetweenbilateralimplantationofatrifocalintraocularlensandblendedimplantationoftwobifocalintraocularlenses
AT nosew comparisonbetweenbilateralimplantationofatrifocalintraocularlensandblendedimplantationoftwobifocalintraocularlenses
_version_ 1718403535159164928