A framework for quantifying uncertainty in DFT energy corrections

Abstract In this work, we demonstrate a method to quantify uncertainty in corrections to density functional theory (DFT) energies based on empirical results. Such corrections are commonly used to improve the accuracy of computational enthalpies of formation, phase stability predictions, and other en...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Amanda Wang, Ryan Kingsbury, Matthew McDermott, Matthew Horton, Anubhav Jain, Shyue Ping Ong, Shyam Dwaraknath, Kristin A. Persson
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Nature Portfolio 2021
Materias:
R
Q
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/01cbcca218d344ddb52db613c074fb03
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:01cbcca218d344ddb52db613c074fb03
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:01cbcca218d344ddb52db613c074fb032021-12-02T16:31:52ZA framework for quantifying uncertainty in DFT energy corrections10.1038/s41598-021-94550-52045-2322https://doaj.org/article/01cbcca218d344ddb52db613c074fb032021-07-01T00:00:00Zhttps://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-94550-5https://doaj.org/toc/2045-2322Abstract In this work, we demonstrate a method to quantify uncertainty in corrections to density functional theory (DFT) energies based on empirical results. Such corrections are commonly used to improve the accuracy of computational enthalpies of formation, phase stability predictions, and other energy-derived properties, for example. We incorporate this method into a new DFT energy correction scheme comprising a mixture of oxidation-state and composition-dependent corrections and show that many chemical systems contain unstable polymorphs that may actually be predicted stable when uncertainty is taken into account. We then illustrate how these uncertainties can be used to estimate the probability that a compound is stable on a compositional phase diagram, thus enabling better-informed assessments of compound stability.Amanda WangRyan KingsburyMatthew McDermottMatthew HortonAnubhav JainShyue Ping OngShyam DwaraknathKristin A. PerssonNature PortfolioarticleMedicineRScienceQENScientific Reports, Vol 11, Iss 1, Pp 1-10 (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic Medicine
R
Science
Q
spellingShingle Medicine
R
Science
Q
Amanda Wang
Ryan Kingsbury
Matthew McDermott
Matthew Horton
Anubhav Jain
Shyue Ping Ong
Shyam Dwaraknath
Kristin A. Persson
A framework for quantifying uncertainty in DFT energy corrections
description Abstract In this work, we demonstrate a method to quantify uncertainty in corrections to density functional theory (DFT) energies based on empirical results. Such corrections are commonly used to improve the accuracy of computational enthalpies of formation, phase stability predictions, and other energy-derived properties, for example. We incorporate this method into a new DFT energy correction scheme comprising a mixture of oxidation-state and composition-dependent corrections and show that many chemical systems contain unstable polymorphs that may actually be predicted stable when uncertainty is taken into account. We then illustrate how these uncertainties can be used to estimate the probability that a compound is stable on a compositional phase diagram, thus enabling better-informed assessments of compound stability.
format article
author Amanda Wang
Ryan Kingsbury
Matthew McDermott
Matthew Horton
Anubhav Jain
Shyue Ping Ong
Shyam Dwaraknath
Kristin A. Persson
author_facet Amanda Wang
Ryan Kingsbury
Matthew McDermott
Matthew Horton
Anubhav Jain
Shyue Ping Ong
Shyam Dwaraknath
Kristin A. Persson
author_sort Amanda Wang
title A framework for quantifying uncertainty in DFT energy corrections
title_short A framework for quantifying uncertainty in DFT energy corrections
title_full A framework for quantifying uncertainty in DFT energy corrections
title_fullStr A framework for quantifying uncertainty in DFT energy corrections
title_full_unstemmed A framework for quantifying uncertainty in DFT energy corrections
title_sort framework for quantifying uncertainty in dft energy corrections
publisher Nature Portfolio
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/01cbcca218d344ddb52db613c074fb03
work_keys_str_mv AT amandawang aframeworkforquantifyinguncertaintyindftenergycorrections
AT ryankingsbury aframeworkforquantifyinguncertaintyindftenergycorrections
AT matthewmcdermott aframeworkforquantifyinguncertaintyindftenergycorrections
AT matthewhorton aframeworkforquantifyinguncertaintyindftenergycorrections
AT anubhavjain aframeworkforquantifyinguncertaintyindftenergycorrections
AT shyuepingong aframeworkforquantifyinguncertaintyindftenergycorrections
AT shyamdwaraknath aframeworkforquantifyinguncertaintyindftenergycorrections
AT kristinapersson aframeworkforquantifyinguncertaintyindftenergycorrections
AT amandawang frameworkforquantifyinguncertaintyindftenergycorrections
AT ryankingsbury frameworkforquantifyinguncertaintyindftenergycorrections
AT matthewmcdermott frameworkforquantifyinguncertaintyindftenergycorrections
AT matthewhorton frameworkforquantifyinguncertaintyindftenergycorrections
AT anubhavjain frameworkforquantifyinguncertaintyindftenergycorrections
AT shyuepingong frameworkforquantifyinguncertaintyindftenergycorrections
AT shyamdwaraknath frameworkforquantifyinguncertaintyindftenergycorrections
AT kristinapersson frameworkforquantifyinguncertaintyindftenergycorrections
_version_ 1718383791873982464