A comparison of the da Vinci Xi vs. da Vinci Si surgical systems for radical prostatectomy

Abstract Background To compare the perioperative and short-term efficacy and cost of the da Vinci Xi and da Vinci Si surgical systems for radical prostatectomy. Methods We retrospectively analyzed the clinical data of 175 patients with prostate cancer who underwent radical prostatectomy with the da...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kun-Yang Lei, Wen-Jie Xie, Sheng-Qiang Fu, Ming Ma, Ting Sun
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: BMC 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/01ee40845f504a0a8c89108c5f192a68
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:01ee40845f504a0a8c89108c5f192a68
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:01ee40845f504a0a8c89108c5f192a682021-12-05T12:06:27ZA comparison of the da Vinci Xi vs. da Vinci Si surgical systems for radical prostatectomy10.1186/s12893-021-01406-w1471-2482https://doaj.org/article/01ee40845f504a0a8c89108c5f192a682021-11-01T00:00:00Zhttps://doi.org/10.1186/s12893-021-01406-whttps://doaj.org/toc/1471-2482Abstract Background To compare the perioperative and short-term efficacy and cost of the da Vinci Xi and da Vinci Si surgical systems for radical prostatectomy. Methods We retrospectively analyzed the clinical data of 175 patients with prostate cancer who underwent radical prostatectomy with the da Vinci Si or Xi surgical systems in our hospital from June 2019 to June 2020. Of the 175 patients, 82 underwent robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy with the da Vinci Xi surgery system, and 93 patients underwent robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy with the da Vinci Si surgical system. The perioperative outcomes, short-term efficacy and costs were compared between the two groups. Results The anesthesia time, operation time, docking time, indwelling catheter time and postoperative bed rest time in the Xi group were shorter than those in the Si group (respectively, 268.8 min vs. 219.3 min, P = 0.001; 228.2 min vs. 259.6 min, P < 0.001; 7.4 min vs. 12.7 min, P < 0.001; 8.6 d vs. 9.7 d, P = 0.036; 2.2 d vs. 2.6 d, P = 0.002). However, the total cost of hospitalization and the cost of intraoperative consumables in the Xi group were higher than those in the Si group (84,740.7 vs. 76,739.1 ¥, P = 0.003; 13,199.4 vs. 10,823.0 ¥, P = 0.019). Conclusions Although the cost of robot-assisted radical prostatectomy is higher, compared with the Si system, the Xi system has better perioperative outcomes and can provide similar short-term efficacy and oncology outcomes.Kun-Yang LeiWen-Jie XieSheng-Qiang FuMing MaTing SunBMCarticleDa Vinci SiDa Vinci XiRadical prostatectomySurgeryRD1-811ENBMC Surgery, Vol 21, Iss 1, Pp 1-6 (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic Da Vinci Si
Da Vinci Xi
Radical prostatectomy
Surgery
RD1-811
spellingShingle Da Vinci Si
Da Vinci Xi
Radical prostatectomy
Surgery
RD1-811
Kun-Yang Lei
Wen-Jie Xie
Sheng-Qiang Fu
Ming Ma
Ting Sun
A comparison of the da Vinci Xi vs. da Vinci Si surgical systems for radical prostatectomy
description Abstract Background To compare the perioperative and short-term efficacy and cost of the da Vinci Xi and da Vinci Si surgical systems for radical prostatectomy. Methods We retrospectively analyzed the clinical data of 175 patients with prostate cancer who underwent radical prostatectomy with the da Vinci Si or Xi surgical systems in our hospital from June 2019 to June 2020. Of the 175 patients, 82 underwent robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy with the da Vinci Xi surgery system, and 93 patients underwent robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy with the da Vinci Si surgical system. The perioperative outcomes, short-term efficacy and costs were compared between the two groups. Results The anesthesia time, operation time, docking time, indwelling catheter time and postoperative bed rest time in the Xi group were shorter than those in the Si group (respectively, 268.8 min vs. 219.3 min, P = 0.001; 228.2 min vs. 259.6 min, P < 0.001; 7.4 min vs. 12.7 min, P < 0.001; 8.6 d vs. 9.7 d, P = 0.036; 2.2 d vs. 2.6 d, P = 0.002). However, the total cost of hospitalization and the cost of intraoperative consumables in the Xi group were higher than those in the Si group (84,740.7 vs. 76,739.1 ¥, P = 0.003; 13,199.4 vs. 10,823.0 ¥, P = 0.019). Conclusions Although the cost of robot-assisted radical prostatectomy is higher, compared with the Si system, the Xi system has better perioperative outcomes and can provide similar short-term efficacy and oncology outcomes.
format article
author Kun-Yang Lei
Wen-Jie Xie
Sheng-Qiang Fu
Ming Ma
Ting Sun
author_facet Kun-Yang Lei
Wen-Jie Xie
Sheng-Qiang Fu
Ming Ma
Ting Sun
author_sort Kun-Yang Lei
title A comparison of the da Vinci Xi vs. da Vinci Si surgical systems for radical prostatectomy
title_short A comparison of the da Vinci Xi vs. da Vinci Si surgical systems for radical prostatectomy
title_full A comparison of the da Vinci Xi vs. da Vinci Si surgical systems for radical prostatectomy
title_fullStr A comparison of the da Vinci Xi vs. da Vinci Si surgical systems for radical prostatectomy
title_full_unstemmed A comparison of the da Vinci Xi vs. da Vinci Si surgical systems for radical prostatectomy
title_sort comparison of the da vinci xi vs. da vinci si surgical systems for radical prostatectomy
publisher BMC
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/01ee40845f504a0a8c89108c5f192a68
work_keys_str_mv AT kunyanglei acomparisonofthedavincixivsdavincisisurgicalsystemsforradicalprostatectomy
AT wenjiexie acomparisonofthedavincixivsdavincisisurgicalsystemsforradicalprostatectomy
AT shengqiangfu acomparisonofthedavincixivsdavincisisurgicalsystemsforradicalprostatectomy
AT mingma acomparisonofthedavincixivsdavincisisurgicalsystemsforradicalprostatectomy
AT tingsun acomparisonofthedavincixivsdavincisisurgicalsystemsforradicalprostatectomy
AT kunyanglei comparisonofthedavincixivsdavincisisurgicalsystemsforradicalprostatectomy
AT wenjiexie comparisonofthedavincixivsdavincisisurgicalsystemsforradicalprostatectomy
AT shengqiangfu comparisonofthedavincixivsdavincisisurgicalsystemsforradicalprostatectomy
AT mingma comparisonofthedavincixivsdavincisisurgicalsystemsforradicalprostatectomy
AT tingsun comparisonofthedavincixivsdavincisisurgicalsystemsforradicalprostatectomy
_version_ 1718372233862184960