On the selection of precipitation products for the regionalisation of hydrological model parameters

<p>Over the past decades, novel parameter regionalisation techniques have been developed to predict streamflow in data-scarce regions. In this paper, we examined how the choice of gridded daily precipitation (<span class="inline-formula"><i>P</i></span>) produ...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: O. M. Baez-Villanueva, M. Zambrano-Bigiarini, P. A. Mendoza, I. McNamara, H. E. Beck, J. Thurner, A. Nauditt, L. Ribbe, N. X. Thinh
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Copernicus Publications 2021
Materias:
T
G
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/02077e1090724f7f8872672abbcacf08
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:02077e1090724f7f8872672abbcacf08
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:02077e1090724f7f8872672abbcacf082021-11-11T06:02:27ZOn the selection of precipitation products for the regionalisation of hydrological model parameters10.5194/hess-25-5805-20211027-56061607-7938https://doaj.org/article/02077e1090724f7f8872672abbcacf082021-11-01T00:00:00Zhttps://hess.copernicus.org/articles/25/5805/2021/hess-25-5805-2021.pdfhttps://doaj.org/toc/1027-5606https://doaj.org/toc/1607-7938<p>Over the past decades, novel parameter regionalisation techniques have been developed to predict streamflow in data-scarce regions. In this paper, we examined how the choice of gridded daily precipitation (<span class="inline-formula"><i>P</i></span>) products affects the relative performance of three well-known parameter regionalisation techniques (spatial proximity, feature similarity, and parameter regression) over 100 near-natural catchments with diverse hydrological regimes across Chile. We set up and calibrated a conceptual semi-distributed HBV-like hydrological model (TUWmodel) for each catchment, using four <span class="inline-formula"><i>P</i></span> products (CR2MET, RF-MEP, ERA5, and MSWEPv2.8). We assessed the ability of these regionalisation techniques to transfer the parameters of a rainfall-runoff model, implementing a leave-one-out cross-validation procedure for each <span class="inline-formula"><i>P</i></span> product. Despite differences in the spatio-temporal distribution of <span class="inline-formula"><i>P</i></span>, all products provided good performance during calibration (median Kling–Gupta efficiencies (KGE<span class="inline-formula"><sup>′</sup></span>s) <span class="inline-formula">&gt;</span> 0.77), two independent verification periods (median KGE<span class="inline-formula"><sup>′</sup></span>s <span class="inline-formula">&gt;0.70</span> and 0.61, for near-normal and dry conditions, respectively), and regionalisation (median KGE<span class="inline-formula"><sup>′</sup></span>s for the best method ranging from 0.56 to 0.63). We show how model calibration is able to compensate, to some extent, differences between <span class="inline-formula"><i>P</i></span> forcings by adjusting model parameters and thus the water balance components. Overall, feature similarity provided the best results, followed by spatial proximity, while parameter regression resulted in the worst performance, reinforcing the importance of transferring complete model parameter sets to ungauged catchments. Our results suggest that (i) merging <span class="inline-formula"><i>P</i></span> products and ground-based measurements does not necessarily translate into an improved hydrologic model performance; (ii) the spatial resolution of <span class="inline-formula"><i>P</i></span> products does not substantially affect the regionalisation performance; (iii) a <span class="inline-formula"><i>P</i></span> product that provides the best individual model performance during calibration and verification does not necessarily yield the best performance in terms of parameter regionalisation; and (iv) the model parameters and the performance of regionalisation methods are affected by the hydrological regime, with the best results for spatial proximity and feature similarity obtained for rain-dominated catchments with a minor snowmelt component.</p>O. M. Baez-VillanuevaO. M. Baez-VillanuevaM. Zambrano-BigiariniM. Zambrano-BigiariniP. A. MendozaP. A. MendozaI. McNamaraH. E. BeckJ. ThurnerA. NaudittL. RibbeN. X. ThinhCopernicus PublicationsarticleTechnologyTEnvironmental technology. Sanitary engineeringTD1-1066Geography. Anthropology. RecreationGEnvironmental sciencesGE1-350ENHydrology and Earth System Sciences, Vol 25, Pp 5805-5837 (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic Technology
T
Environmental technology. Sanitary engineering
TD1-1066
Geography. Anthropology. Recreation
G
Environmental sciences
GE1-350
spellingShingle Technology
T
Environmental technology. Sanitary engineering
TD1-1066
Geography. Anthropology. Recreation
G
Environmental sciences
GE1-350
O. M. Baez-Villanueva
O. M. Baez-Villanueva
M. Zambrano-Bigiarini
M. Zambrano-Bigiarini
P. A. Mendoza
P. A. Mendoza
I. McNamara
H. E. Beck
J. Thurner
A. Nauditt
L. Ribbe
N. X. Thinh
On the selection of precipitation products for the regionalisation of hydrological model parameters
description <p>Over the past decades, novel parameter regionalisation techniques have been developed to predict streamflow in data-scarce regions. In this paper, we examined how the choice of gridded daily precipitation (<span class="inline-formula"><i>P</i></span>) products affects the relative performance of three well-known parameter regionalisation techniques (spatial proximity, feature similarity, and parameter regression) over 100 near-natural catchments with diverse hydrological regimes across Chile. We set up and calibrated a conceptual semi-distributed HBV-like hydrological model (TUWmodel) for each catchment, using four <span class="inline-formula"><i>P</i></span> products (CR2MET, RF-MEP, ERA5, and MSWEPv2.8). We assessed the ability of these regionalisation techniques to transfer the parameters of a rainfall-runoff model, implementing a leave-one-out cross-validation procedure for each <span class="inline-formula"><i>P</i></span> product. Despite differences in the spatio-temporal distribution of <span class="inline-formula"><i>P</i></span>, all products provided good performance during calibration (median Kling–Gupta efficiencies (KGE<span class="inline-formula"><sup>′</sup></span>s) <span class="inline-formula">&gt;</span> 0.77), two independent verification periods (median KGE<span class="inline-formula"><sup>′</sup></span>s <span class="inline-formula">&gt;0.70</span> and 0.61, for near-normal and dry conditions, respectively), and regionalisation (median KGE<span class="inline-formula"><sup>′</sup></span>s for the best method ranging from 0.56 to 0.63). We show how model calibration is able to compensate, to some extent, differences between <span class="inline-formula"><i>P</i></span> forcings by adjusting model parameters and thus the water balance components. Overall, feature similarity provided the best results, followed by spatial proximity, while parameter regression resulted in the worst performance, reinforcing the importance of transferring complete model parameter sets to ungauged catchments. Our results suggest that (i) merging <span class="inline-formula"><i>P</i></span> products and ground-based measurements does not necessarily translate into an improved hydrologic model performance; (ii) the spatial resolution of <span class="inline-formula"><i>P</i></span> products does not substantially affect the regionalisation performance; (iii) a <span class="inline-formula"><i>P</i></span> product that provides the best individual model performance during calibration and verification does not necessarily yield the best performance in terms of parameter regionalisation; and (iv) the model parameters and the performance of regionalisation methods are affected by the hydrological regime, with the best results for spatial proximity and feature similarity obtained for rain-dominated catchments with a minor snowmelt component.</p>
format article
author O. M. Baez-Villanueva
O. M. Baez-Villanueva
M. Zambrano-Bigiarini
M. Zambrano-Bigiarini
P. A. Mendoza
P. A. Mendoza
I. McNamara
H. E. Beck
J. Thurner
A. Nauditt
L. Ribbe
N. X. Thinh
author_facet O. M. Baez-Villanueva
O. M. Baez-Villanueva
M. Zambrano-Bigiarini
M. Zambrano-Bigiarini
P. A. Mendoza
P. A. Mendoza
I. McNamara
H. E. Beck
J. Thurner
A. Nauditt
L. Ribbe
N. X. Thinh
author_sort O. M. Baez-Villanueva
title On the selection of precipitation products for the regionalisation of hydrological model parameters
title_short On the selection of precipitation products for the regionalisation of hydrological model parameters
title_full On the selection of precipitation products for the regionalisation of hydrological model parameters
title_fullStr On the selection of precipitation products for the regionalisation of hydrological model parameters
title_full_unstemmed On the selection of precipitation products for the regionalisation of hydrological model parameters
title_sort on the selection of precipitation products for the regionalisation of hydrological model parameters
publisher Copernicus Publications
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/02077e1090724f7f8872672abbcacf08
work_keys_str_mv AT ombaezvillanueva ontheselectionofprecipitationproductsfortheregionalisationofhydrologicalmodelparameters
AT ombaezvillanueva ontheselectionofprecipitationproductsfortheregionalisationofhydrologicalmodelparameters
AT mzambranobigiarini ontheselectionofprecipitationproductsfortheregionalisationofhydrologicalmodelparameters
AT mzambranobigiarini ontheselectionofprecipitationproductsfortheregionalisationofhydrologicalmodelparameters
AT pamendoza ontheselectionofprecipitationproductsfortheregionalisationofhydrologicalmodelparameters
AT pamendoza ontheselectionofprecipitationproductsfortheregionalisationofhydrologicalmodelparameters
AT imcnamara ontheselectionofprecipitationproductsfortheregionalisationofhydrologicalmodelparameters
AT hebeck ontheselectionofprecipitationproductsfortheregionalisationofhydrologicalmodelparameters
AT jthurner ontheselectionofprecipitationproductsfortheregionalisationofhydrologicalmodelparameters
AT anauditt ontheselectionofprecipitationproductsfortheregionalisationofhydrologicalmodelparameters
AT lribbe ontheselectionofprecipitationproductsfortheregionalisationofhydrologicalmodelparameters
AT nxthinh ontheselectionofprecipitationproductsfortheregionalisationofhydrologicalmodelparameters
_version_ 1718439461830787072