Yield and Quality of Passion Fruit in Relation to Training Systems
Four different training systems, viz., Kniffin, High trellis, Tatura and Bower were evaluated in passion fruit cv. Kaveri. Kniffin system with 4 arms recorded highest cumulative yield of 67.22 t/ha with a cost:benefit ratio of 1:4.25, followed by Kniffin 2 arm and 6 arm, respectively. Kniffin system...
Guardado en:
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | article |
Lenguaje: | EN |
Publicado: |
Society for Promotion of Horticulture - Indian Institute of Horticultural Research
2012
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://doaj.org/article/02205a2586bf4854a73fa12a583ffeb3 |
Etiquetas: |
Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
|
id |
oai:doaj.org-article:02205a2586bf4854a73fa12a583ffeb3 |
---|---|
record_format |
dspace |
spelling |
oai:doaj.org-article:02205a2586bf4854a73fa12a583ffeb32021-12-02T10:35:43ZYield and Quality of Passion Fruit in Relation to Training Systems0973-354X2582-4899https://doaj.org/article/02205a2586bf4854a73fa12a583ffeb32012-06-01T00:00:00Zhttps://jhs.iihr.res.in/index.php/jhs/article/view/389https://doaj.org/toc/0973-354Xhttps://doaj.org/toc/2582-4899Four different training systems, viz., Kniffin, High trellis, Tatura and Bower were evaluated in passion fruit cv. Kaveri. Kniffin system with 4 arms recorded highest cumulative yield of 67.22 t/ha with a cost:benefit ratio of 1:4.25, followed by Kniffin 2 arm and 6 arm, respectively. Kniffin system was also the most ideal system of training for passion fruit, facilitating easy cultural operations. Although Tatura system recorded highest cumulative yield/vine (43.57kg), it registered lowest yield/ha, largely due to lower plant population/ha (1250 vines/ha). Fruit quality parameters like TSS, Vit. C, carotene content and titrable acidity were not significantly influenced by different training systems. Similarly, interception of Photosynthetically Active Radiation (PAR) by the canopy did not differ significantly among training systems. Though photosynthetic rate did not differ significantly, shaded leaves in the canopy did not contribute photosynthates and were parasitic on the vine.V V SulladmathK SrinivasR H LaxmanSociety for Promotion of Horticulture - Indian Institute of Horticultural Researcharticlepassion fruitkniffinhigh trellistaturabowerphotosynthetically active radiation(par)Plant cultureSB1-1110ENJournal of Horticultural Sciences, Vol 7, Iss 1, Pp 46-50 (2012) |
institution |
DOAJ |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
EN |
topic |
passion fruit kniffin high trellis tatura bower photosynthetically active radiation(par) Plant culture SB1-1110 |
spellingShingle |
passion fruit kniffin high trellis tatura bower photosynthetically active radiation(par) Plant culture SB1-1110 V V Sulladmath K Srinivas R H Laxman Yield and Quality of Passion Fruit in Relation to Training Systems |
description |
Four different training systems, viz., Kniffin, High trellis, Tatura and Bower were evaluated in passion fruit cv. Kaveri. Kniffin system with 4 arms recorded highest cumulative yield of 67.22 t/ha with a cost:benefit ratio of 1:4.25, followed by Kniffin 2 arm and 6 arm, respectively. Kniffin system was also the most ideal system of training for passion fruit, facilitating easy cultural operations. Although Tatura system recorded highest cumulative yield/vine (43.57kg), it registered lowest yield/ha, largely due to lower plant population/ha (1250 vines/ha). Fruit quality parameters like TSS, Vit. C, carotene content and titrable acidity were not significantly influenced by different training systems. Similarly, interception of Photosynthetically Active Radiation (PAR) by the canopy did not differ significantly among training systems. Though photosynthetic rate did not differ significantly, shaded leaves in the canopy did not contribute photosynthates and were parasitic on the vine. |
format |
article |
author |
V V Sulladmath K Srinivas R H Laxman |
author_facet |
V V Sulladmath K Srinivas R H Laxman |
author_sort |
V V Sulladmath |
title |
Yield and Quality of Passion Fruit in Relation to Training Systems |
title_short |
Yield and Quality of Passion Fruit in Relation to Training Systems |
title_full |
Yield and Quality of Passion Fruit in Relation to Training Systems |
title_fullStr |
Yield and Quality of Passion Fruit in Relation to Training Systems |
title_full_unstemmed |
Yield and Quality of Passion Fruit in Relation to Training Systems |
title_sort |
yield and quality of passion fruit in relation to training systems |
publisher |
Society for Promotion of Horticulture - Indian Institute of Horticultural Research |
publishDate |
2012 |
url |
https://doaj.org/article/02205a2586bf4854a73fa12a583ffeb3 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT vvsulladmath yieldandqualityofpassionfruitinrelationtotrainingsystems AT ksrinivas yieldandqualityofpassionfruitinrelationtotrainingsystems AT rhlaxman yieldandqualityofpassionfruitinrelationtotrainingsystems |
_version_ |
1718396984022269952 |