Comparative analysis of existing waste-to-energy reference plants for municipal solid waste

This study is a comparative analysis of thermal conversion technology options through data evaluation and assessment of reference plants that process municipal solid waste (MSW). A combined extensive literature review and multicriteria analysis was applied to determine the optimal Waste-to-Energy (W...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales:	Marco Angelo Satiada, Aldrin Calderon
Formato:	article
Lenguaje:	EN
Publicado:	Elsevier 2021
Materias:	Waste-to-energy option MSW Thermal conversion technologies Reference plants Comparative analysis Environmental effects of industries and plants TD194-195
Acceso en línea:	https://doaj.org/article/02422a257bda4c73a540c0bd64839973
Etiquetas:	Agregar Etiqueta Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!

id	oai:doaj.org-article:02422a257bda4c73a540c0bd64839973
record_format	dspace
spelling	oai:doaj.org-article:02422a257bda4c73a540c0bd648399732021-12-02T05:04:26ZComparative analysis of existing waste-to-energy reference plants for municipal solid waste2666-789410.1016/j.cesys.2021.100063https://doaj.org/article/02422a257bda4c73a540c0bd648399732021-12-01T00:00:00Zhttp://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666789421000556https://doaj.org/toc/2666-7894This study is a comparative analysis of thermal conversion technology options through data evaluation and assessment of reference plants that process municipal solid waste (MSW). A combined extensive literature review and multicriteria analysis was applied to determine the optimal Waste-to-Energy (WtE). The main focus of the study is to identify and examine the specific thermal conversion technologies with proven reference plants for energy generation. The “availability of reference plants” was used as a key criterion for the study, resulting to the different types and categories of thermal conversion technologies, such as conventional incineration (grate incineration, fluidized bed combustion), pyrolysis (rotary kiln), gasification (fixed bed, fluidized bed, moving grate) and plasma gasification. While comparative aspects, such as technological, economic, quality of feed, and environmental, were formulated to further analyze and investigate the reference plants. Finally, the evaluation of technologies presented a summary of reference plants showing the comparative analysis of WtE options in terms of capacity, power production, cost, calorific value, emission and residues, etc. Overall, gasification and pyrolysis are the better option in terms of emission, capital cost, quality of feed, and power production while still being competitive in terms of capacity.Marco Angelo SatiadaAldrin CalderonElsevierarticleWaste-to-energy optionMSWThermal conversion technologiesReference plantsComparative analysisEnvironmental effects of industries and plantsTD194-195ENCleaner Environmental Systems, Vol 3, Iss , Pp 100063- (2021)
institution	DOAJ
collection	DOAJ
language	EN
topic	Waste-to-energy option MSW Thermal conversion technologies Reference plants Comparative analysis Environmental effects of industries and plants TD194-195
spellingShingle	Waste-to-energy option MSW Thermal conversion technologies Reference plants Comparative analysis Environmental effects of industries and plants TD194-195 Marco Angelo Satiada Aldrin Calderon Comparative analysis of existing waste-to-energy reference plants for municipal solid waste
description	This study is a comparative analysis of thermal conversion technology options through data evaluation and assessment of reference plants that process municipal solid waste (MSW). A combined extensive literature review and multicriteria analysis was applied to determine the optimal Waste-to-Energy (WtE). The main focus of the study is to identify and examine the specific thermal conversion technologies with proven reference plants for energy generation. The “availability of reference plants” was used as a key criterion for the study, resulting to the different types and categories of thermal conversion technologies, such as conventional incineration (grate incineration, fluidized bed combustion), pyrolysis (rotary kiln), gasification (fixed bed, fluidized bed, moving grate) and plasma gasification. While comparative aspects, such as technological, economic, quality of feed, and environmental, were formulated to further analyze and investigate the reference plants. Finally, the evaluation of technologies presented a summary of reference plants showing the comparative analysis of WtE options in terms of capacity, power production, cost, calorific value, emission and residues, etc. Overall, gasification and pyrolysis are the better option in terms of emission, capital cost, quality of feed, and power production while still being competitive in terms of capacity.
format	article
author	Marco Angelo Satiada Aldrin Calderon
author_facet	Marco Angelo Satiada Aldrin Calderon
author_sort	Marco Angelo Satiada
title	Comparative analysis of existing waste-to-energy reference plants for municipal solid waste
title_short	Comparative analysis of existing waste-to-energy reference plants for municipal solid waste
title_full	Comparative analysis of existing waste-to-energy reference plants for municipal solid waste
title_fullStr	Comparative analysis of existing waste-to-energy reference plants for municipal solid waste
title_full_unstemmed	Comparative analysis of existing waste-to-energy reference plants for municipal solid waste
title_sort	comparative analysis of existing waste-to-energy reference plants for municipal solid waste
publisher	Elsevier
publishDate	2021
url	https://doaj.org/article/02422a257bda4c73a540c0bd64839973
work_keys_str_mv	AT marcoangelosatiada comparativeanalysisofexistingwastetoenergyreferenceplantsformunicipalsolidwaste AT aldrincalderon comparativeanalysisofexistingwastetoenergyreferenceplantsformunicipalsolidwaste
_version_	1718400630573236224

Comparative analysis of existing waste-to-energy reference plants for municipal solid waste

Ejemplares similares