Cross-sex hormone treatment and own-body perception: behavioral and brain connectivity profiles

Abstract Referrals for gender dysphoria (GD), characterized by a distressful incongruence between gender identity and at-birth assigned sex, are steadily increasing. The underlying neurobiology, and the mechanisms of the often-beneficial cross-sex hormone treatment are unknown. Here, we test hypothe...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Behzad S. Khorashad, Amirhossein Manzouri, Jamie D. Feusner, Ivanka Savic
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Nature Portfolio 2021
Materias:
R
Q
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/0278cd57cab64e74b3a521a268695729
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:0278cd57cab64e74b3a521a268695729
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:0278cd57cab64e74b3a521a2686957292021-12-02T10:44:08ZCross-sex hormone treatment and own-body perception: behavioral and brain connectivity profiles10.1038/s41598-020-80687-22045-2322https://doaj.org/article/0278cd57cab64e74b3a521a2686957292021-02-01T00:00:00Zhttps://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-80687-2https://doaj.org/toc/2045-2322Abstract Referrals for gender dysphoria (GD), characterized by a distressful incongruence between gender identity and at-birth assigned sex, are steadily increasing. The underlying neurobiology, and the mechanisms of the often-beneficial cross-sex hormone treatment are unknown. Here, we test hypothesis that own body perception networks (incorporated in the default mode network—DMN, and partly in the salience network—SN), are different in trans-compared with cis-gender persons. We also investigate whether these networks change with cross-sex hormone treatment. Forty transmen (TrM) and 25 transwomen (TrW) were scanned before and after cross-sex hormone institution. We used our own developed Body Morph test (BM), to assess the perception of own body as self. Fifteen cisgender persons were controls. Within and between-group differences in functional connectivity were calculated using independent components analysis within the DMN, SN, and motor network (a control network). Pretreatment, TrM and TrW scored lower “self” on the BM test than controls. Their functional connections were weaker in the anterior cingulate-, mesial prefrontal-cortex (mPFC), precuneus, the left angular gyrus, and superior parietal cortex of the DMN, and ACC in the SN “Self” identification and connectivity in the mPFC in both TrM and TrW increased from scan 1 to 2, and at scan 2 no group differences remained. The neurobiological underpinnings of GD seem subserved by cerebral structures composing major parts of the DMN.Behzad S. KhorashadAmirhossein ManzouriJamie D. FeusnerIvanka SavicNature PortfolioarticleMedicineRScienceQENScientific Reports, Vol 11, Iss 1, Pp 1-11 (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic Medicine
R
Science
Q
spellingShingle Medicine
R
Science
Q
Behzad S. Khorashad
Amirhossein Manzouri
Jamie D. Feusner
Ivanka Savic
Cross-sex hormone treatment and own-body perception: behavioral and brain connectivity profiles
description Abstract Referrals for gender dysphoria (GD), characterized by a distressful incongruence between gender identity and at-birth assigned sex, are steadily increasing. The underlying neurobiology, and the mechanisms of the often-beneficial cross-sex hormone treatment are unknown. Here, we test hypothesis that own body perception networks (incorporated in the default mode network—DMN, and partly in the salience network—SN), are different in trans-compared with cis-gender persons. We also investigate whether these networks change with cross-sex hormone treatment. Forty transmen (TrM) and 25 transwomen (TrW) were scanned before and after cross-sex hormone institution. We used our own developed Body Morph test (BM), to assess the perception of own body as self. Fifteen cisgender persons were controls. Within and between-group differences in functional connectivity were calculated using independent components analysis within the DMN, SN, and motor network (a control network). Pretreatment, TrM and TrW scored lower “self” on the BM test than controls. Their functional connections were weaker in the anterior cingulate-, mesial prefrontal-cortex (mPFC), precuneus, the left angular gyrus, and superior parietal cortex of the DMN, and ACC in the SN “Self” identification and connectivity in the mPFC in both TrM and TrW increased from scan 1 to 2, and at scan 2 no group differences remained. The neurobiological underpinnings of GD seem subserved by cerebral structures composing major parts of the DMN.
format article
author Behzad S. Khorashad
Amirhossein Manzouri
Jamie D. Feusner
Ivanka Savic
author_facet Behzad S. Khorashad
Amirhossein Manzouri
Jamie D. Feusner
Ivanka Savic
author_sort Behzad S. Khorashad
title Cross-sex hormone treatment and own-body perception: behavioral and brain connectivity profiles
title_short Cross-sex hormone treatment and own-body perception: behavioral and brain connectivity profiles
title_full Cross-sex hormone treatment and own-body perception: behavioral and brain connectivity profiles
title_fullStr Cross-sex hormone treatment and own-body perception: behavioral and brain connectivity profiles
title_full_unstemmed Cross-sex hormone treatment and own-body perception: behavioral and brain connectivity profiles
title_sort cross-sex hormone treatment and own-body perception: behavioral and brain connectivity profiles
publisher Nature Portfolio
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/0278cd57cab64e74b3a521a268695729
work_keys_str_mv AT behzadskhorashad crosssexhormonetreatmentandownbodyperceptionbehavioralandbrainconnectivityprofiles
AT amirhosseinmanzouri crosssexhormonetreatmentandownbodyperceptionbehavioralandbrainconnectivityprofiles
AT jamiedfeusner crosssexhormonetreatmentandownbodyperceptionbehavioralandbrainconnectivityprofiles
AT ivankasavic crosssexhormonetreatmentandownbodyperceptionbehavioralandbrainconnectivityprofiles
_version_ 1718396806316949504