Skuteczność poprawek parlamentu europejskiego w procedurze (specjalnej procedurze ustawodawczej)

The aim of the article is to empirically analyze the effectiveness of the European Parliament’s amendments in one of the special legislative procedures, namely consultation. In the first step, several hypotheses were developed predicting positive or negative impact of certain factors on the EP amen...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Adam Kirpsza
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
PL
Publicado: Ksiegarnia Akademicka Publishing 2021
Materias:
Law
K
J
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/028643a62b324ac28b8e945b881cc5b7
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:028643a62b324ac28b8e945b881cc5b7
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:028643a62b324ac28b8e945b881cc5b72021-11-27T13:07:50ZSkuteczność poprawek parlamentu europejskiego w procedurze (specjalnej procedurze ustawodawczej)10.12797/Politeja.12.2015.35.271733-67162391-6737https://doaj.org/article/028643a62b324ac28b8e945b881cc5b72021-06-01T00:00:00Zhttps://journals.akademicka.pl/politeja/article/view/2340https://doaj.org/toc/1733-6716https://doaj.org/toc/2391-6737 The aim of the article is to empirically analyze the effectiveness of the European Parliament’s amendments in one of the special legislative procedures, namely consultation. In the first step, several hypotheses were developed predicting positive or negative impact of certain factors on the EP amendments success. Subsequently, those suppositions were quantitatively tested by logistic regression on special dataset representing 599 legislative acts adopted during the fifth and sixth parliamentary term, that is, between 1 May 1999 and June 2009, under consultation. The results revealed that the EP is more likely to be successful in this procedure if it implements five strategies. Firstly, it seeks to conclude a package deal, that is, it links a consultation decision to a codecision or budgetary proposal. Secondly, it delays its opinion on a legislative proposal. Thirdly, it persuades the European Commission to support its amendments. Fourthly, it prolongs legislative negotiations with the Council until the end of parliamentary term. Fifthly, it accumulates all its negotiation resources on salient proposals. In addition, the EP is more likely to succeed in consultation when it proposes democratic and financial amendments, whereas it is least likely to be successful when it tables institutional issues. The success of EP amendments is also significantly greater in directives than in regulations, decisions or framework decisions. On the other hand, voting rule in the Council, rapporteur experience and her/his political affiliation with EPP‑ED, PES or ELDR/ALDE don’t have any impact on the EP amendments success. Adam KirpszaKsiegarnia Akademicka PublishingarticleUnia Europejskaspecjalna procedura ustawodawczakonsultacjasukces poprawek Parlamentunegocjacje legislacyjneLawKPolitical scienceJENPLPoliteja, Vol 12, Iss 3 (35) (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
PL
topic Unia Europejska
specjalna procedura ustawodawcza
konsultacja
sukces poprawek Parlamentu
negocjacje legislacyjne
Law
K
Political science
J
spellingShingle Unia Europejska
specjalna procedura ustawodawcza
konsultacja
sukces poprawek Parlamentu
negocjacje legislacyjne
Law
K
Political science
J
Adam Kirpsza
Skuteczność poprawek parlamentu europejskiego w procedurze (specjalnej procedurze ustawodawczej)
description The aim of the article is to empirically analyze the effectiveness of the European Parliament’s amendments in one of the special legislative procedures, namely consultation. In the first step, several hypotheses were developed predicting positive or negative impact of certain factors on the EP amendments success. Subsequently, those suppositions were quantitatively tested by logistic regression on special dataset representing 599 legislative acts adopted during the fifth and sixth parliamentary term, that is, between 1 May 1999 and June 2009, under consultation. The results revealed that the EP is more likely to be successful in this procedure if it implements five strategies. Firstly, it seeks to conclude a package deal, that is, it links a consultation decision to a codecision or budgetary proposal. Secondly, it delays its opinion on a legislative proposal. Thirdly, it persuades the European Commission to support its amendments. Fourthly, it prolongs legislative negotiations with the Council until the end of parliamentary term. Fifthly, it accumulates all its negotiation resources on salient proposals. In addition, the EP is more likely to succeed in consultation when it proposes democratic and financial amendments, whereas it is least likely to be successful when it tables institutional issues. The success of EP amendments is also significantly greater in directives than in regulations, decisions or framework decisions. On the other hand, voting rule in the Council, rapporteur experience and her/his political affiliation with EPP‑ED, PES or ELDR/ALDE don’t have any impact on the EP amendments success.
format article
author Adam Kirpsza
author_facet Adam Kirpsza
author_sort Adam Kirpsza
title Skuteczność poprawek parlamentu europejskiego w procedurze (specjalnej procedurze ustawodawczej)
title_short Skuteczność poprawek parlamentu europejskiego w procedurze (specjalnej procedurze ustawodawczej)
title_full Skuteczność poprawek parlamentu europejskiego w procedurze (specjalnej procedurze ustawodawczej)
title_fullStr Skuteczność poprawek parlamentu europejskiego w procedurze (specjalnej procedurze ustawodawczej)
title_full_unstemmed Skuteczność poprawek parlamentu europejskiego w procedurze (specjalnej procedurze ustawodawczej)
title_sort skuteczność poprawek parlamentu europejskiego w procedurze (specjalnej procedurze ustawodawczej)
publisher Ksiegarnia Akademicka Publishing
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/028643a62b324ac28b8e945b881cc5b7
work_keys_str_mv AT adamkirpsza skutecznoscpoprawekparlamentueuropejskiegowprocedurzespecjalnejprocedurzeustawodawczej
_version_ 1718408721893163008