Radical and Ionic Mechanisms in Rearrangements of <i>o</i>-Tolyl Aryl Ethers and Amines Initiated by the Grubbs–Stoltz Reagent, Et<sub>3</sub>SiH/KO<i><sup>t</sup></i>Bu

Rearrangements of <i>o-</i>tolyl aryl ethers, amines, and sulfides with the Grubbs–Stoltz reagent (Et<sub>3</sub>SiH + KO<i><sup>t</sup></i>Bu) were recently announced, in which the ethers were converted to <i>o</i>-hydroxydiarylmethanes, w...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Krystian Kolodziejczak, Alexander J. Stewart, Tell Tuttle, John A. Murphy
Format: article
Language:EN
Published: MDPI AG 2021
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doaj.org/article/03077899a6ae4b57a6121c3f428c75da
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Rearrangements of <i>o-</i>tolyl aryl ethers, amines, and sulfides with the Grubbs–Stoltz reagent (Et<sub>3</sub>SiH + KO<i><sup>t</sup></i>Bu) were recently announced, in which the ethers were converted to <i>o</i>-hydroxydiarylmethanes, while the (<i>o-</i>tol)(Ar)NH amines were transformed into dihydroacridines. Radical mechanisms were proposed, based on prior evidence for triethylsilyl radicals in this reagent system. A detailed computational investigation of the rearrangements of the aryl tolyl ethers now instead supports an anionic Truce–Smiles rearrangement, where the initial benzyl anion can be formed by either of two pathways: (i) direct deprotonation of the tolyl methyl group under basic conditions or (ii) electron transfer to an initially formed benzyl radical. By contrast, the rearrangements of <i>o-</i>tolyl aryl amines depend on the nature of the amine. Secondary amines undergo deprotonation of the N-H followed by a radical rearrangement, to form dihydroacridines, while tertiary amines form both dihydroacridines and diarylmethanes through radical and/or anionic pathways. Overall, this study highlights the competition between the reactive intermediates formed by the Et<sub>3</sub>SiH/KO<i><sup>t</sup></i>Bu system.