Extending the production boundary of the System of National Accounts (SNA) to classify and account for ecosystem services

There is a broad acceptance to depicting the relationship between ecosystems and human well-being using the concept of ecosystem services, emanating in large from the findings and research published in the Millennium Ecosystem Assessment in 2005 . While the generic concept of ecosystem services prov...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mark Eigenraam, Carl Obst
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Taylor & Francis Group 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/0356b078a869446e83477ec6e66c0272
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:0356b078a869446e83477ec6e66c0272
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:0356b078a869446e83477ec6e66c02722021-12-02T13:38:53ZExtending the production boundary of the System of National Accounts (SNA) to classify and account for ecosystem services2096-41292332-887810.1080/20964129.2018.1524718https://doaj.org/article/0356b078a869446e83477ec6e66c02722018-11-01T00:00:00Zhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1080/20964129.2018.1524718https://doaj.org/toc/2096-4129https://doaj.org/toc/2332-8878There is a broad acceptance to depicting the relationship between ecosystems and human well-being using the concept of ecosystem services, emanating in large from the findings and research published in the Millennium Ecosystem Assessment in 2005 . While the generic concept of ecosystem services provides an excellent platform for discussion, the ongoing lack of clarity surrounding the definition, classification and measurement of ecosystem services, is emerging as a barrier to more extensive collaboration across disciplines. This paper applies the principles of national accounting to bring additional rigor and consistency to the discussion on ecosystem services. In this paper we revisit four fundamental aspects of the System of National Accounts (SNA) that underpin the measurement of the economy, namely, the definition of economic units; the definition of production; the recording of transactions and the recording assets. By considering each of these aspects in the context of the United Nations’ System of Environmental-Economic Accounting, the paper presents a framework to describe the relationship between ecosystems and human activity that can then be used to consistently define, classify, measure and account for ecosystem services.Mark EigenraamCarl ObstTaylor & Francis GrouparticleEcosystem accountingsystem of national accountsecosystem servicesecosystem assetenvironmental accountingEcologyQH540-549.5ENEcosystem Health and Sustainability, Vol 4, Iss 11, Pp 247-260 (2018)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic Ecosystem accounting
system of national accounts
ecosystem services
ecosystem asset
environmental accounting
Ecology
QH540-549.5
spellingShingle Ecosystem accounting
system of national accounts
ecosystem services
ecosystem asset
environmental accounting
Ecology
QH540-549.5
Mark Eigenraam
Carl Obst
Extending the production boundary of the System of National Accounts (SNA) to classify and account for ecosystem services
description There is a broad acceptance to depicting the relationship between ecosystems and human well-being using the concept of ecosystem services, emanating in large from the findings and research published in the Millennium Ecosystem Assessment in 2005 . While the generic concept of ecosystem services provides an excellent platform for discussion, the ongoing lack of clarity surrounding the definition, classification and measurement of ecosystem services, is emerging as a barrier to more extensive collaboration across disciplines. This paper applies the principles of national accounting to bring additional rigor and consistency to the discussion on ecosystem services. In this paper we revisit four fundamental aspects of the System of National Accounts (SNA) that underpin the measurement of the economy, namely, the definition of economic units; the definition of production; the recording of transactions and the recording assets. By considering each of these aspects in the context of the United Nations’ System of Environmental-Economic Accounting, the paper presents a framework to describe the relationship between ecosystems and human activity that can then be used to consistently define, classify, measure and account for ecosystem services.
format article
author Mark Eigenraam
Carl Obst
author_facet Mark Eigenraam
Carl Obst
author_sort Mark Eigenraam
title Extending the production boundary of the System of National Accounts (SNA) to classify and account for ecosystem services
title_short Extending the production boundary of the System of National Accounts (SNA) to classify and account for ecosystem services
title_full Extending the production boundary of the System of National Accounts (SNA) to classify and account for ecosystem services
title_fullStr Extending the production boundary of the System of National Accounts (SNA) to classify and account for ecosystem services
title_full_unstemmed Extending the production boundary of the System of National Accounts (SNA) to classify and account for ecosystem services
title_sort extending the production boundary of the system of national accounts (sna) to classify and account for ecosystem services
publisher Taylor & Francis Group
publishDate 2018
url https://doaj.org/article/0356b078a869446e83477ec6e66c0272
work_keys_str_mv AT markeigenraam extendingtheproductionboundaryofthesystemofnationalaccountssnatoclassifyandaccountforecosystemservices
AT carlobst extendingtheproductionboundaryofthesystemofnationalaccountssnatoclassifyandaccountforecosystemservices
_version_ 1718392595523043328