A comparison of the vancomycin calcium sulfate implantation versus fenestration decompression for the treatment of sclerosing osteomyelitis
Abstract Objective To compare the clinical efficacy of vancomycin calcium sulfate implantation and fenestration decompression in the treatment of sclerosing osteomyelitis. Method A retrospective analysis for 46 cases of sclerosing osteomyelitis were admitted to our department between June 2010 to Ju...
Guardado en:
| Autores principales: | , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Formato: | article |
| Lenguaje: | EN |
| Publicado: |
BMC
2021
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | https://doaj.org/article/03966273cbf04ad4b0b929cb5a3413b7 |
| Etiquetas: |
Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
|
| id |
oai:doaj.org-article:03966273cbf04ad4b0b929cb5a3413b7 |
|---|---|
| record_format |
dspace |
| spelling |
oai:doaj.org-article:03966273cbf04ad4b0b929cb5a3413b72021-12-05T12:18:26ZA comparison of the vancomycin calcium sulfate implantation versus fenestration decompression for the treatment of sclerosing osteomyelitis10.1186/s12891-021-04881-71471-2474https://doaj.org/article/03966273cbf04ad4b0b929cb5a3413b72021-11-01T00:00:00Zhttps://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-021-04881-7https://doaj.org/toc/1471-2474Abstract Objective To compare the clinical efficacy of vancomycin calcium sulfate implantation and fenestration decompression in the treatment of sclerosing osteomyelitis. Method A retrospective analysis for 46 cases of sclerosing osteomyelitis were admitted to our department between June 2010 to June 2020. Twenty-one patients were treated with fenestration decompression, twenty-five patients were treated with vancomycin calcium sulfate implantation. The postoperative hospital stay, days of drainage tube placement, visual analogue scale scores, C-reactive protein and erythrocyte sedimentation rate were compared between the two groups. Results The visual analogue scale scores of both groups were significantly lower than before treatment (p < 0.05), but the difference between them was not statistically significant. Patients treated by vancomycin calcium sulfate implantation had shorter postoperative hospital stay and days of drainage tube placement compared to those treated by fenestration decompression (p < 0.05). C-reactive protein and erythrocyte sedimentation rate in both groups were significantly lower than before treatment, but the improvement effect of vancomycin calcium sulfate implantation was better (p < 0.05). Conclusion Both treatment methods can relieve pain effectively. Compared with fenestration decompression, vancomycin calcium sulfate implantation can shorten the treatment time effectively, control the infection better.Haotian HuaXinwei WangJiangang GuoLei ZhangZairan GuoJiangfei ChenBMCarticleVancomycin calcium sulfate implantation (VCSI)Fenestration decompression (FD)Sclerosing osteomyelitisPainDiseases of the musculoskeletal systemRC925-935ENBMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, Vol 22, Iss 1, Pp 1-7 (2021) |
| institution |
DOAJ |
| collection |
DOAJ |
| language |
EN |
| topic |
Vancomycin calcium sulfate implantation (VCSI) Fenestration decompression (FD) Sclerosing osteomyelitis Pain Diseases of the musculoskeletal system RC925-935 |
| spellingShingle |
Vancomycin calcium sulfate implantation (VCSI) Fenestration decompression (FD) Sclerosing osteomyelitis Pain Diseases of the musculoskeletal system RC925-935 Haotian Hua Xinwei Wang Jiangang Guo Lei Zhang Zairan Guo Jiangfei Chen A comparison of the vancomycin calcium sulfate implantation versus fenestration decompression for the treatment of sclerosing osteomyelitis |
| description |
Abstract Objective To compare the clinical efficacy of vancomycin calcium sulfate implantation and fenestration decompression in the treatment of sclerosing osteomyelitis. Method A retrospective analysis for 46 cases of sclerosing osteomyelitis were admitted to our department between June 2010 to June 2020. Twenty-one patients were treated with fenestration decompression, twenty-five patients were treated with vancomycin calcium sulfate implantation. The postoperative hospital stay, days of drainage tube placement, visual analogue scale scores, C-reactive protein and erythrocyte sedimentation rate were compared between the two groups. Results The visual analogue scale scores of both groups were significantly lower than before treatment (p < 0.05), but the difference between them was not statistically significant. Patients treated by vancomycin calcium sulfate implantation had shorter postoperative hospital stay and days of drainage tube placement compared to those treated by fenestration decompression (p < 0.05). C-reactive protein and erythrocyte sedimentation rate in both groups were significantly lower than before treatment, but the improvement effect of vancomycin calcium sulfate implantation was better (p < 0.05). Conclusion Both treatment methods can relieve pain effectively. Compared with fenestration decompression, vancomycin calcium sulfate implantation can shorten the treatment time effectively, control the infection better. |
| format |
article |
| author |
Haotian Hua Xinwei Wang Jiangang Guo Lei Zhang Zairan Guo Jiangfei Chen |
| author_facet |
Haotian Hua Xinwei Wang Jiangang Guo Lei Zhang Zairan Guo Jiangfei Chen |
| author_sort |
Haotian Hua |
| title |
A comparison of the vancomycin calcium sulfate implantation versus fenestration decompression for the treatment of sclerosing osteomyelitis |
| title_short |
A comparison of the vancomycin calcium sulfate implantation versus fenestration decompression for the treatment of sclerosing osteomyelitis |
| title_full |
A comparison of the vancomycin calcium sulfate implantation versus fenestration decompression for the treatment of sclerosing osteomyelitis |
| title_fullStr |
A comparison of the vancomycin calcium sulfate implantation versus fenestration decompression for the treatment of sclerosing osteomyelitis |
| title_full_unstemmed |
A comparison of the vancomycin calcium sulfate implantation versus fenestration decompression for the treatment of sclerosing osteomyelitis |
| title_sort |
comparison of the vancomycin calcium sulfate implantation versus fenestration decompression for the treatment of sclerosing osteomyelitis |
| publisher |
BMC |
| publishDate |
2021 |
| url |
https://doaj.org/article/03966273cbf04ad4b0b929cb5a3413b7 |
| work_keys_str_mv |
AT haotianhua acomparisonofthevancomycincalciumsulfateimplantationversusfenestrationdecompressionforthetreatmentofsclerosingosteomyelitis AT xinweiwang acomparisonofthevancomycincalciumsulfateimplantationversusfenestrationdecompressionforthetreatmentofsclerosingosteomyelitis AT jiangangguo acomparisonofthevancomycincalciumsulfateimplantationversusfenestrationdecompressionforthetreatmentofsclerosingosteomyelitis AT leizhang acomparisonofthevancomycincalciumsulfateimplantationversusfenestrationdecompressionforthetreatmentofsclerosingosteomyelitis AT zairanguo acomparisonofthevancomycincalciumsulfateimplantationversusfenestrationdecompressionforthetreatmentofsclerosingosteomyelitis AT jiangfeichen acomparisonofthevancomycincalciumsulfateimplantationversusfenestrationdecompressionforthetreatmentofsclerosingosteomyelitis AT haotianhua comparisonofthevancomycincalciumsulfateimplantationversusfenestrationdecompressionforthetreatmentofsclerosingosteomyelitis AT xinweiwang comparisonofthevancomycincalciumsulfateimplantationversusfenestrationdecompressionforthetreatmentofsclerosingosteomyelitis AT jiangangguo comparisonofthevancomycincalciumsulfateimplantationversusfenestrationdecompressionforthetreatmentofsclerosingosteomyelitis AT leizhang comparisonofthevancomycincalciumsulfateimplantationversusfenestrationdecompressionforthetreatmentofsclerosingosteomyelitis AT zairanguo comparisonofthevancomycincalciumsulfateimplantationversusfenestrationdecompressionforthetreatmentofsclerosingosteomyelitis AT jiangfeichen comparisonofthevancomycincalciumsulfateimplantationversusfenestrationdecompressionforthetreatmentofsclerosingosteomyelitis |
| _version_ |
1718372055819223040 |