Evaluation of Self-Directed Learning in Nursing Students: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Background. Self-directed learning plays an important role in nursing education and is associated with academic achievement, communication self-efficacy, assertiveness, responsibility, and students’ clinical competencies. This study was conducted to analyze the existing research on the level of self...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales:	Mohammad Nazarianpirdosti, Maryam Janatolmakan, Bahareh Andayeshgar, Alireza Khatony
Formato:	article
Lenguaje:	EN
Publicado:	Hindawi Limited 2021
Materias:	Education (General) L7-991
Acceso en línea:	https://doaj.org/article/03ad504ecd4b42c9974b769cdbedd06b
Etiquetas:	Agregar Etiqueta Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!

id	oai:doaj.org-article:03ad504ecd4b42c9974b769cdbedd06b
record_format	dspace
spelling	oai:doaj.org-article:03ad504ecd4b42c9974b769cdbedd06b2021-11-29T00:56:43ZEvaluation of Self-Directed Learning in Nursing Students: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis2090-401010.1155/2021/2112108https://doaj.org/article/03ad504ecd4b42c9974b769cdbedd06b2021-01-01T00:00:00Zhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2021/2112108https://doaj.org/toc/2090-4010Background. Self-directed learning plays an important role in nursing education and is associated with academic achievement, communication self-efficacy, assertiveness, responsibility, and students’ clinical competencies. This study was conducted to analyze the existing research on the level of self-directed learning in nursing students. Methods. In this systematic review and meta-analysis, all studies that had examined the level of self-directed learning in nursing students until March 2, 2020, were searched in Science Direct, Ovid, Scopus, PubMed, ProQuest, Web of Science, and Google Scholar databases. In the meta-analysis section, I2 index and the random effects model were used. Comprehensive Meta-Analysis software (version 2) was used for data analysis. Results. The mean score of self-directed learning in 12 articles with 3830 samples was 156.73 ± 1.47 out of 200 (95% CI: 153.3–160.1). These scores were 153.50 ± 2.71 (95% CI: 148.18–158.82) and 154.67 ± 1.32 (95% CI: 157.50–159.32) in the male and female students, respectively. There was a significant relationship between self-directed learning and sample size, year of study, and semester (p<0.05). Conclusion. The mean self-directed learning in nursing students was at a moderate level, which does not seem to be sufficient. Given the positive role of self-directed learning in nursing education, it is essential that nursing professors teach self-directed learning skills to students via training courses.Mohammad NazarianpirdostiMaryam JanatolmakanBahareh AndayeshgarAlireza KhatonyHindawi LimitedarticleEducation (General)L7-991ENEducation Research International, Vol 2021 (2021)
institution	DOAJ
collection	DOAJ
language	EN
topic	Education (General) L7-991
spellingShingle	Education (General) L7-991 Mohammad Nazarianpirdosti Maryam Janatolmakan Bahareh Andayeshgar Alireza Khatony Evaluation of Self-Directed Learning in Nursing Students: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
description	Background. Self-directed learning plays an important role in nursing education and is associated with academic achievement, communication self-efficacy, assertiveness, responsibility, and students’ clinical competencies. This study was conducted to analyze the existing research on the level of self-directed learning in nursing students. Methods. In this systematic review and meta-analysis, all studies that had examined the level of self-directed learning in nursing students until March 2, 2020, were searched in Science Direct, Ovid, Scopus, PubMed, ProQuest, Web of Science, and Google Scholar databases. In the meta-analysis section, I2 index and the random effects model were used. Comprehensive Meta-Analysis software (version 2) was used for data analysis. Results. The mean score of self-directed learning in 12 articles with 3830 samples was 156.73 ± 1.47 out of 200 (95% CI: 153.3–160.1). These scores were 153.50 ± 2.71 (95% CI: 148.18–158.82) and 154.67 ± 1.32 (95% CI: 157.50–159.32) in the male and female students, respectively. There was a significant relationship between self-directed learning and sample size, year of study, and semester (p<0.05). Conclusion. The mean self-directed learning in nursing students was at a moderate level, which does not seem to be sufficient. Given the positive role of self-directed learning in nursing education, it is essential that nursing professors teach self-directed learning skills to students via training courses.
format	article
author	Mohammad Nazarianpirdosti Maryam Janatolmakan Bahareh Andayeshgar Alireza Khatony
author_facet	Mohammad Nazarianpirdosti Maryam Janatolmakan Bahareh Andayeshgar Alireza Khatony
author_sort	Mohammad Nazarianpirdosti
title	Evaluation of Self-Directed Learning in Nursing Students: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_short	Evaluation of Self-Directed Learning in Nursing Students: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_full	Evaluation of Self-Directed Learning in Nursing Students: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_fullStr	Evaluation of Self-Directed Learning in Nursing Students: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_full_unstemmed	Evaluation of Self-Directed Learning in Nursing Students: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_sort	evaluation of self-directed learning in nursing students: a systematic review and meta-analysis
publisher	Hindawi Limited
publishDate	2021
url	https://doaj.org/article/03ad504ecd4b42c9974b769cdbedd06b
work_keys_str_mv	AT mohammadnazarianpirdosti evaluationofselfdirectedlearninginnursingstudentsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT maryamjanatolmakan evaluationofselfdirectedlearninginnursingstudentsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT baharehandayeshgar evaluationofselfdirectedlearninginnursingstudentsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT alirezakhatony evaluationofselfdirectedlearninginnursingstudentsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
_version_	1718407687369129984

Evaluation of Self-Directed Learning in Nursing Students: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Ejemplares similares