Impact of individual demographic and social factors on human–wildlife interactions: a comparative study of three macaque species

Abstract Despite increasing conflict at human–wildlife interfaces, there exists little research on how the attributes and behavior of individual wild animals may influence human–wildlife interactions. Adopting a comparative approach, we examined the impact of animals’ life-history and social attribu...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Krishna N. Balasubramaniam, Pascal R. Marty, Shelby Samartino, Alvaro Sobrino, Taniya Gill, Mohammed Ismail, Rajarshi Saha, Brianne A. Beisner, Stefano S. K. Kaburu, Eliza Bliss-Moreau, Malgorzata E. Arlet, Nadine Ruppert, Ahmad Ismail, Shahrul Anuar Mohd Sah, Lalit Mohan, Sandeep K. Rattan, Ullasa Kodandaramaiah, Brenda McCowan
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Nature Portfolio 2020
Materias:
R
Q
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/03d0c0c376d448a580dd2946201f9d17
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
Descripción
Sumario:Abstract Despite increasing conflict at human–wildlife interfaces, there exists little research on how the attributes and behavior of individual wild animals may influence human–wildlife interactions. Adopting a comparative approach, we examined the impact of animals’ life-history and social attributes on interactions between humans and (peri)urban macaques in Asia. For 10 groups of rhesus, long-tailed, and bonnet macaques, we collected social behavior, spatial data, and human–interaction data for 11–20 months on pre-identified individuals. Mixed-model analysis revealed that, across all species, males and spatially peripheral individuals interacted with humans the most, and that high-ranking individuals initiated more interactions with humans than low-rankers. Among bonnet macaques, but not rhesus or long-tailed macaques, individuals who were more well-connected in their grooming network interacted more frequently with humans than less well-connected individuals. From an evolutionary perspective, our results suggest that individuals incurring lower costs related to their life-history (males) and resource-access (high rank; strong social connections within a socially tolerant macaque species), but also higher costs on account of compromising the advantages of being in the core of their group (spatial periphery), are the most likely to take risks by interacting with humans in anthropogenic environments. From a conservation perspective, evaluating individual behavior will better inform efforts to minimize conflict-related costs and zoonotic-risk.