Hypothesis-based Acceptance Sampling for Modules F and F1 of the European Measuring Instruments Directive
Millions of measuring instruments are verified each year before being placed on the markets worldwide. In the EU, such initial conformity assessments are regulated by the Measuring Instruments Directive (MID). The MID modules F and F1 on product verification allow for statistical acceptance sampling...
Guardado en:
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | article |
Lenguaje: | EN |
Publicado: |
Taylor & Francis Group
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://doaj.org/article/03d798c5bec84d1c8551e870288b9a90 |
Etiquetas: |
Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
|
id |
oai:doaj.org-article:03d798c5bec84d1c8551e870288b9a90 |
---|---|
record_format |
dspace |
spelling |
oai:doaj.org-article:03d798c5bec84d1c8551e870288b9a902021-11-26T11:19:50ZHypothesis-based Acceptance Sampling for Modules F and F1 of the European Measuring Instruments Directive2330-443X10.1080/2330443X.2021.1900762https://doaj.org/article/03d798c5bec84d1c8551e870288b9a902021-01-01T00:00:00Zhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1080/2330443X.2021.1900762https://doaj.org/toc/2330-443XMillions of measuring instruments are verified each year before being placed on the markets worldwide. In the EU, such initial conformity assessments are regulated by the Measuring Instruments Directive (MID). The MID modules F and F1 on product verification allow for statistical acceptance sampling, whereby only random subsets of instruments need to be inspected. This article re-interprets the acceptance sampling conditions formulated by the MID. The new interpretation is contrasted with the one advanced in WELMEC guide 8.10, and three advantages have become apparent. First, an economic advantage of the new interpretation is a producers’ risk bounded from above, such that measuring instruments with sufficient quality are accepted with a guaranteed probability of no less than 95%. Second, a conceptual advantage is that the new MID interpretation fits into the well known, formal framework of statistical hypothesis testing. Thirdly, the new interpretation applies unambiguously to finite-sized lots, even very small ones. We conclude that the new interpretation is to be preferred and suggest re-formulating the statistical sampling conditions in the MID. Re-interpreting the MID conditions implies that currently available sampling plans are either not admissible or not optimal. We derive a new acceptance sampling scheme and recommend its application. Supplementary materials for this article are available online.Katy KlauenbergCord A. MüllerClemens ElsterTaylor & Francis Grouparticleconformity assessmenteuropean measuring instruments directive (mid)hypothesis testproducers’ riskPolitical institutions and public administration (General)JF20-2112Probabilities. Mathematical statisticsQA273-280ENStatistics and Public Policy, Vol 8, Iss 1, Pp 9-17 (2021) |
institution |
DOAJ |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
EN |
topic |
conformity assessment european measuring instruments directive (mid) hypothesis test producers’ risk Political institutions and public administration (General) JF20-2112 Probabilities. Mathematical statistics QA273-280 |
spellingShingle |
conformity assessment european measuring instruments directive (mid) hypothesis test producers’ risk Political institutions and public administration (General) JF20-2112 Probabilities. Mathematical statistics QA273-280 Katy Klauenberg Cord A. Müller Clemens Elster Hypothesis-based Acceptance Sampling for Modules F and F1 of the European Measuring Instruments Directive |
description |
Millions of measuring instruments are verified each year before being placed on the markets worldwide. In the EU, such initial conformity assessments are regulated by the Measuring Instruments Directive (MID). The MID modules F and F1 on product verification allow for statistical acceptance sampling, whereby only random subsets of instruments need to be inspected. This article re-interprets the acceptance sampling conditions formulated by the MID. The new interpretation is contrasted with the one advanced in WELMEC guide 8.10, and three advantages have become apparent. First, an economic advantage of the new interpretation is a producers’ risk bounded from above, such that measuring instruments with sufficient quality are accepted with a guaranteed probability of no less than 95%. Second, a conceptual advantage is that the new MID interpretation fits into the well known, formal framework of statistical hypothesis testing. Thirdly, the new interpretation applies unambiguously to finite-sized lots, even very small ones. We conclude that the new interpretation is to be preferred and suggest re-formulating the statistical sampling conditions in the MID. Re-interpreting the MID conditions implies that currently available sampling plans are either not admissible or not optimal. We derive a new acceptance sampling scheme and recommend its application. Supplementary materials for this article are available online. |
format |
article |
author |
Katy Klauenberg Cord A. Müller Clemens Elster |
author_facet |
Katy Klauenberg Cord A. Müller Clemens Elster |
author_sort |
Katy Klauenberg |
title |
Hypothesis-based Acceptance Sampling for Modules F and F1 of the European Measuring Instruments Directive |
title_short |
Hypothesis-based Acceptance Sampling for Modules F and F1 of the European Measuring Instruments Directive |
title_full |
Hypothesis-based Acceptance Sampling for Modules F and F1 of the European Measuring Instruments Directive |
title_fullStr |
Hypothesis-based Acceptance Sampling for Modules F and F1 of the European Measuring Instruments Directive |
title_full_unstemmed |
Hypothesis-based Acceptance Sampling for Modules F and F1 of the European Measuring Instruments Directive |
title_sort |
hypothesis-based acceptance sampling for modules f and f1 of the european measuring instruments directive |
publisher |
Taylor & Francis Group |
publishDate |
2021 |
url |
https://doaj.org/article/03d798c5bec84d1c8551e870288b9a90 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT katyklauenberg hypothesisbasedacceptancesamplingformodulesfandf1oftheeuropeanmeasuringinstrumentsdirective AT cordamuller hypothesisbasedacceptancesamplingformodulesfandf1oftheeuropeanmeasuringinstrumentsdirective AT clemenselster hypothesisbasedacceptancesamplingformodulesfandf1oftheeuropeanmeasuringinstrumentsdirective |
_version_ |
1718409449991831552 |