Hypothesis-based Acceptance Sampling for Modules F and F1 of the European Measuring Instruments Directive

Millions of measuring instruments are verified each year before being placed on the markets worldwide. In the EU, such initial conformity assessments are regulated by the Measuring Instruments Directive (MID). The MID modules F and F1 on product verification allow for statistical acceptance sampling...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Katy Klauenberg, Cord A. Müller, Clemens Elster
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Taylor & Francis Group 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/03d798c5bec84d1c8551e870288b9a90
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:03d798c5bec84d1c8551e870288b9a90
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:03d798c5bec84d1c8551e870288b9a902021-11-26T11:19:50ZHypothesis-based Acceptance Sampling for Modules F and F1 of the European Measuring Instruments Directive2330-443X10.1080/2330443X.2021.1900762https://doaj.org/article/03d798c5bec84d1c8551e870288b9a902021-01-01T00:00:00Zhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1080/2330443X.2021.1900762https://doaj.org/toc/2330-443XMillions of measuring instruments are verified each year before being placed on the markets worldwide. In the EU, such initial conformity assessments are regulated by the Measuring Instruments Directive (MID). The MID modules F and F1 on product verification allow for statistical acceptance sampling, whereby only random subsets of instruments need to be inspected. This article re-interprets the acceptance sampling conditions formulated by the MID. The new interpretation is contrasted with the one advanced in WELMEC guide 8.10, and three advantages have become apparent. First, an economic advantage of the new interpretation is a producers’ risk bounded from above, such that measuring instruments with sufficient quality are accepted with a guaranteed probability of no less than 95%. Second, a conceptual advantage is that the new MID interpretation fits into the well known, formal framework of statistical hypothesis testing. Thirdly, the new interpretation applies unambiguously to finite-sized lots, even very small ones. We conclude that the new interpretation is to be preferred and suggest re-formulating the statistical sampling conditions in the MID. Re-interpreting the MID conditions implies that currently available sampling plans are either not admissible or not optimal. We derive a new acceptance sampling scheme and recommend its application. Supplementary materials for this article are available online.Katy KlauenbergCord A. MüllerClemens ElsterTaylor & Francis Grouparticleconformity assessmenteuropean measuring instruments directive (mid)hypothesis testproducers’ riskPolitical institutions and public administration (General)JF20-2112Probabilities. Mathematical statisticsQA273-280ENStatistics and Public Policy, Vol 8, Iss 1, Pp 9-17 (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic conformity assessment
european measuring instruments directive (mid)
hypothesis test
producers’ risk
Political institutions and public administration (General)
JF20-2112
Probabilities. Mathematical statistics
QA273-280
spellingShingle conformity assessment
european measuring instruments directive (mid)
hypothesis test
producers’ risk
Political institutions and public administration (General)
JF20-2112
Probabilities. Mathematical statistics
QA273-280
Katy Klauenberg
Cord A. Müller
Clemens Elster
Hypothesis-based Acceptance Sampling for Modules F and F1 of the European Measuring Instruments Directive
description Millions of measuring instruments are verified each year before being placed on the markets worldwide. In the EU, such initial conformity assessments are regulated by the Measuring Instruments Directive (MID). The MID modules F and F1 on product verification allow for statistical acceptance sampling, whereby only random subsets of instruments need to be inspected. This article re-interprets the acceptance sampling conditions formulated by the MID. The new interpretation is contrasted with the one advanced in WELMEC guide 8.10, and three advantages have become apparent. First, an economic advantage of the new interpretation is a producers’ risk bounded from above, such that measuring instruments with sufficient quality are accepted with a guaranteed probability of no less than 95%. Second, a conceptual advantage is that the new MID interpretation fits into the well known, formal framework of statistical hypothesis testing. Thirdly, the new interpretation applies unambiguously to finite-sized lots, even very small ones. We conclude that the new interpretation is to be preferred and suggest re-formulating the statistical sampling conditions in the MID. Re-interpreting the MID conditions implies that currently available sampling plans are either not admissible or not optimal. We derive a new acceptance sampling scheme and recommend its application. Supplementary materials for this article are available online.
format article
author Katy Klauenberg
Cord A. Müller
Clemens Elster
author_facet Katy Klauenberg
Cord A. Müller
Clemens Elster
author_sort Katy Klauenberg
title Hypothesis-based Acceptance Sampling for Modules F and F1 of the European Measuring Instruments Directive
title_short Hypothesis-based Acceptance Sampling for Modules F and F1 of the European Measuring Instruments Directive
title_full Hypothesis-based Acceptance Sampling for Modules F and F1 of the European Measuring Instruments Directive
title_fullStr Hypothesis-based Acceptance Sampling for Modules F and F1 of the European Measuring Instruments Directive
title_full_unstemmed Hypothesis-based Acceptance Sampling for Modules F and F1 of the European Measuring Instruments Directive
title_sort hypothesis-based acceptance sampling for modules f and f1 of the european measuring instruments directive
publisher Taylor & Francis Group
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/03d798c5bec84d1c8551e870288b9a90
work_keys_str_mv AT katyklauenberg hypothesisbasedacceptancesamplingformodulesfandf1oftheeuropeanmeasuringinstrumentsdirective
AT cordamuller hypothesisbasedacceptancesamplingformodulesfandf1oftheeuropeanmeasuringinstrumentsdirective
AT clemenselster hypothesisbasedacceptancesamplingformodulesfandf1oftheeuropeanmeasuringinstrumentsdirective
_version_ 1718409449991831552