Arts of eristic, of dialectic and of sophistry as premises of legal discourse development

Discourse arts of ancient Greece demonstrate in the V century BC division of discourses, and are seen as premises of rhetoric, which marked institutional differentiation of speeches and predestinated legal discourse. The purpose of the following analysis is to show cohesion, coherence and mutual dep...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal:	K. H. Rekoch
Formato:	article
Lenguaje:	EN RU
Publicado:	MGIMO University Press 2013
Materias:	arts of dialectics of eristic of sophistry rhetoric orator relativism of the sophists words game knowledge of substance truth plausibility competitiveness virtue opposite meanings International relations JZ2-6530
Acceso en línea:	https://doaj.org/article/03de1084130346b3a4fa7ccb7708a3db
Etiquetas:	Agregar Etiqueta Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!

id	oai:doaj.org-article:03de1084130346b3a4fa7ccb7708a3db
record_format	dspace
spelling	oai:doaj.org-article:03de1084130346b3a4fa7ccb7708a3db2021-11-23T14:50:53ZArts of eristic, of dialectic and of sophistry as premises of legal discourse development2071-81602541-909910.24833/2071-8160-2013-3-30-212-220https://doaj.org/article/03de1084130346b3a4fa7ccb7708a3db2013-06-01T00:00:00Zhttps://www.vestnik.mgimo.ru/jour/article/view/1382https://doaj.org/toc/2071-8160https://doaj.org/toc/2541-9099Discourse arts of ancient Greece demonstrate in the V century BC division of discourses, and are seen as premises of rhetoric, which marked institutional differentiation of speeches and predestinated legal discourse. The purpose of the following analysis is to show cohesion, coherence and mutual dependence of discourse arts as premises of rhetoric. Sophists confirmed with their example the dichotomies of utterance meanings and though they didn't create eloquence art, they laid a way to rhetoric, laid down foundation for language studying, having isolated it from Logos, and also developed techniques of judicial speeches and legal discourse. Criticizing sophists, using their positive methods, Socrat, Platon and later Aristotle defined, on the basis of syllogism, the direction of evolution of rhetoric not as practical eloquence but mainly as methodology of sciences and arts.K. H. RekochMGIMO University Pressarticlearts of dialecticsof eristicof sophistryrhetoricoratorrelativism of the sophistswords gameknowledge of substancetruthplausibilitycompetitivenessvirtueopposite meaningsInternational relationsJZ2-6530ENRUVestnik MGIMO-Universiteta, Vol 0, Iss 3(30), Pp 212-220 (2013)
institution	DOAJ
collection	DOAJ
language	EN RU
topic	arts of dialectics of eristic of sophistry rhetoric orator relativism of the sophists words game knowledge of substance truth plausibility competitiveness virtue opposite meanings International relations JZ2-6530
spellingShingle	arts of dialectics of eristic of sophistry rhetoric orator relativism of the sophists words game knowledge of substance truth plausibility competitiveness virtue opposite meanings International relations JZ2-6530 K. H. Rekoch Arts of eristic, of dialectic and of sophistry as premises of legal discourse development
description	Discourse arts of ancient Greece demonstrate in the V century BC division of discourses, and are seen as premises of rhetoric, which marked institutional differentiation of speeches and predestinated legal discourse. The purpose of the following analysis is to show cohesion, coherence and mutual dependence of discourse arts as premises of rhetoric. Sophists confirmed with their example the dichotomies of utterance meanings and though they didn't create eloquence art, they laid a way to rhetoric, laid down foundation for language studying, having isolated it from Logos, and also developed techniques of judicial speeches and legal discourse. Criticizing sophists, using their positive methods, Socrat, Platon and later Aristotle defined, on the basis of syllogism, the direction of evolution of rhetoric not as practical eloquence but mainly as methodology of sciences and arts.
format	article
author	K. H. Rekoch
author_facet	K. H. Rekoch
author_sort	K. H. Rekoch
title	Arts of eristic, of dialectic and of sophistry as premises of legal discourse development
title_short	Arts of eristic, of dialectic and of sophistry as premises of legal discourse development
title_full	Arts of eristic, of dialectic and of sophistry as premises of legal discourse development
title_fullStr	Arts of eristic, of dialectic and of sophistry as premises of legal discourse development
title_full_unstemmed	Arts of eristic, of dialectic and of sophistry as premises of legal discourse development
title_sort	arts of eristic, of dialectic and of sophistry as premises of legal discourse development
publisher	MGIMO University Press
publishDate	2013
url	https://doaj.org/article/03de1084130346b3a4fa7ccb7708a3db
work_keys_str_mv	AT khrekoch artsoferisticofdialecticandofsophistryaspremisesoflegaldiscoursedevelopment
_version_	1718416374846455808

Arts of eristic, of dialectic and of sophistry as premises of legal discourse development

Ejemplares similares