Being right, but losing money: the role of striatum in joint decision making

Abstract Joint decision-making entails that you sometimes have to go along with the other’s choice even though you disagree. In this situation, a resulting negative outcome may, however, elicit a feeling of satisfaction and an impulse to say “I told you so”. Using fMRI, we investigated the neural co...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales:	M. I. Ruissen, S. Overgaauw, E. R. A. de Bruijn
Formato:	article
Lenguaje:	EN
Publicado:	Nature Portfolio 2018
Materias:	Medicine R Science Q
Acceso en línea:	https://doaj.org/article/0417eb14ba614636947e52a242b2e0c0
Etiquetas:	Agregar Etiqueta Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!

id	oai:doaj.org-article:0417eb14ba614636947e52a242b2e0c0
record_format	dspace
spelling	oai:doaj.org-article:0417eb14ba614636947e52a242b2e0c02021-12-02T16:08:25ZBeing right, but losing money: the role of striatum in joint decision making10.1038/s41598-018-24617-32045-2322https://doaj.org/article/0417eb14ba614636947e52a242b2e0c02018-04-01T00:00:00Zhttps://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-24617-3https://doaj.org/toc/2045-2322Abstract Joint decision-making entails that you sometimes have to go along with the other’s choice even though you disagree. In this situation, a resulting negative outcome may, however, elicit a feeling of satisfaction and an impulse to say “I told you so”. Using fMRI, we investigated the neural correlates of this complex process comprised of both positive and negative outcomes. During a social visual search task, 19 participants gave their advice to a co-actor who then made the decision resulting in a mutual loss or gain. This design allowed direct comparisons of situations that resulted in the same monetary outcome but that differed with respect to the correctness of the initial advice of the participant. Increased striatal activations were found for gains compared to losses and for correct compared to incorrect advice. Importantly, ROI analyses also showed enhanced striatum activation for monetary losses that were preceded by correct compared to incorrect advices. The current study therefore suggests that reward-related neural mechanisms may be involved when being right even in situations that end in monetary losses.M. I. RuissenS. OvergaauwE. R. A. de BruijnNature PortfolioarticleMedicineRScienceQENScientific Reports, Vol 8, Iss 1, Pp 1-11 (2018)
institution	DOAJ
collection	DOAJ
language	EN
topic	Medicine R Science Q
spellingShingle	Medicine R Science Q M. I. Ruissen S. Overgaauw E. R. A. de Bruijn Being right, but losing money: the role of striatum in joint decision making
description	Abstract Joint decision-making entails that you sometimes have to go along with the other’s choice even though you disagree. In this situation, a resulting negative outcome may, however, elicit a feeling of satisfaction and an impulse to say “I told you so”. Using fMRI, we investigated the neural correlates of this complex process comprised of both positive and negative outcomes. During a social visual search task, 19 participants gave their advice to a co-actor who then made the decision resulting in a mutual loss or gain. This design allowed direct comparisons of situations that resulted in the same monetary outcome but that differed with respect to the correctness of the initial advice of the participant. Increased striatal activations were found for gains compared to losses and for correct compared to incorrect advice. Importantly, ROI analyses also showed enhanced striatum activation for monetary losses that were preceded by correct compared to incorrect advices. The current study therefore suggests that reward-related neural mechanisms may be involved when being right even in situations that end in monetary losses.
format	article
author	M. I. Ruissen S. Overgaauw E. R. A. de Bruijn
author_facet	M. I. Ruissen S. Overgaauw E. R. A. de Bruijn
author_sort	M. I. Ruissen
title	Being right, but losing money: the role of striatum in joint decision making
title_short	Being right, but losing money: the role of striatum in joint decision making
title_full	Being right, but losing money: the role of striatum in joint decision making
title_fullStr	Being right, but losing money: the role of striatum in joint decision making
title_full_unstemmed	Being right, but losing money: the role of striatum in joint decision making
title_sort	being right, but losing money: the role of striatum in joint decision making
publisher	Nature Portfolio
publishDate	2018
url	https://doaj.org/article/0417eb14ba614636947e52a242b2e0c0
work_keys_str_mv	AT miruissen beingrightbutlosingmoneytheroleofstriatuminjointdecisionmaking AT sovergaauw beingrightbutlosingmoneytheroleofstriatuminjointdecisionmaking AT eradebruijn beingrightbutlosingmoneytheroleofstriatuminjointdecisionmaking
_version_	1718384451145170944

Being right, but losing money: the role of striatum in joint decision making

Ejemplares similares