Disentangling ecosystem services perception by stakeholders: An integrative assessment based on land cover

Understanding where ecosystem services (ES) are and quantifying their supply using stakeholderś information is key for effective sustainable management. This paper describes a participatory methodology for extracting stakeholders’ ES perception for continental Portugal based on land cover using ana...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales:	Pedro Cabral, Felipe S. Campos, João David, Ursula Caser
Formato:	article
Lenguaje:	EN
Publicado:	Elsevier 2021
Materias:	Stakeholder participation Multi-criteria decision analysis Land cover change CORINE land cover Natural capital Portugal Ecology QH540-549.5
Acceso en línea:	https://doaj.org/article/0423cc29f472409e8c842458cdb67701
Etiquetas:	Agregar Etiqueta Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!

id	oai:doaj.org-article:0423cc29f472409e8c842458cdb67701
record_format	dspace
spelling	oai:doaj.org-article:0423cc29f472409e8c842458cdb677012021-12-01T04:50:46ZDisentangling ecosystem services perception by stakeholders: An integrative assessment based on land cover1470-160X10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.107660https://doaj.org/article/0423cc29f472409e8c842458cdb677012021-07-01T00:00:00Zhttp://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1470160X21003253https://doaj.org/toc/1470-160XUnderstanding where ecosystem services (ES) are and quantifying their supply using stakeholderś information is key for effective sustainable management. This paper describes a participatory methodology for extracting stakeholders’ ES perception for continental Portugal based on land cover using analytical hierarchy process (AHP), matrix-based approach with data visualization techniques, and scenario analysis. Results show that drought regulation was the most valued ES by stakeholders and recreation was considered the least important. Results also show that the “Agricultural areas and “Forests and semi-natural areas” land cover classes provide about two-thirds of the total ES for the country. An “Economic development” scenario will yield negative values for all ES except recreation and food supply, whereas an “Environmental development” scenario will increase all ES, except food supply. Finally, a “Sustainable development” scenario, presents values between the previous two scenarios and is the best for food supply. This operational methodology for extracting information from stakeholders and to report information on the mapping and assessment of ES can be helpful for sustainable planning in Portugal and elsewhere.Pedro CabralFelipe S. CamposJoão DavidUrsula CaserElsevierarticleStakeholder participationMulti-criteria decision analysisLand cover changeCORINE land coverNatural capitalPortugalEcologyQH540-549.5ENEcological Indicators, Vol 126, Iss , Pp 107660- (2021)
institution	DOAJ
collection	DOAJ
language	EN
topic	Stakeholder participation Multi-criteria decision analysis Land cover change CORINE land cover Natural capital Portugal Ecology QH540-549.5
spellingShingle	Stakeholder participation Multi-criteria decision analysis Land cover change CORINE land cover Natural capital Portugal Ecology QH540-549.5 Pedro Cabral Felipe S. Campos João David Ursula Caser Disentangling ecosystem services perception by stakeholders: An integrative assessment based on land cover
description	Understanding where ecosystem services (ES) are and quantifying their supply using stakeholderś information is key for effective sustainable management. This paper describes a participatory methodology for extracting stakeholders’ ES perception for continental Portugal based on land cover using analytical hierarchy process (AHP), matrix-based approach with data visualization techniques, and scenario analysis. Results show that drought regulation was the most valued ES by stakeholders and recreation was considered the least important. Results also show that the “Agricultural areas and “Forests and semi-natural areas” land cover classes provide about two-thirds of the total ES for the country. An “Economic development” scenario will yield negative values for all ES except recreation and food supply, whereas an “Environmental development” scenario will increase all ES, except food supply. Finally, a “Sustainable development” scenario, presents values between the previous two scenarios and is the best for food supply. This operational methodology for extracting information from stakeholders and to report information on the mapping and assessment of ES can be helpful for sustainable planning in Portugal and elsewhere.
format	article
author	Pedro Cabral Felipe S. Campos João David Ursula Caser
author_facet	Pedro Cabral Felipe S. Campos João David Ursula Caser
author_sort	Pedro Cabral
title	Disentangling ecosystem services perception by stakeholders: An integrative assessment based on land cover
title_short	Disentangling ecosystem services perception by stakeholders: An integrative assessment based on land cover
title_full	Disentangling ecosystem services perception by stakeholders: An integrative assessment based on land cover
title_fullStr	Disentangling ecosystem services perception by stakeholders: An integrative assessment based on land cover
title_full_unstemmed	Disentangling ecosystem services perception by stakeholders: An integrative assessment based on land cover
title_sort	disentangling ecosystem services perception by stakeholders: an integrative assessment based on land cover
publisher	Elsevier
publishDate	2021
url	https://doaj.org/article/0423cc29f472409e8c842458cdb67701
work_keys_str_mv	AT pedrocabral disentanglingecosystemservicesperceptionbystakeholdersanintegrativeassessmentbasedonlandcover AT felipescampos disentanglingecosystemservicesperceptionbystakeholdersanintegrativeassessmentbasedonlandcover AT joaodavid disentanglingecosystemservicesperceptionbystakeholdersanintegrativeassessmentbasedonlandcover AT ursulacaser disentanglingecosystemservicesperceptionbystakeholdersanintegrativeassessmentbasedonlandcover
_version_	1718405705221799936

Disentangling ecosystem services perception by stakeholders: An integrative assessment based on land cover

Ejemplares similares