Assessment of polygenic architecture and risk prediction based on common variants across fourteen cancers

Assessment of polygenic architecture and risk prediction based on common variants across fourteen cancers

In cancer many gene variants may contribute to disease etiology, but the impact of a given gene variant may have varied effect size. Here, the authors analyse summary statistics of genome-wide association studies from fourteen cancers, and show the utility of polygenic risk scores may vary depending...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Yan Dora Zhang, Amber N. Hurson, Haoyu Zhang, Parichoy Pal Choudhury, Douglas F. Easton, Roger L. Milne, Jacques Simard, Per Hall, Kyriaki Michailidou, Joe Dennis, Marjanka K. Schmidt, Jenny Chang-Claude, Puya Gharahkhani, David Whiteman, Peter T. Campbell, Michael Hoffmeister, Mark Jenkins, Ulrike Peters, Li Hsu, Stephen B. Gruber, Graham Casey, Stephanie L. Schmit, Tracy A. O’Mara, Amanda B. Spurdle, Deborah J. Thompson, Ian Tomlinson, Immaculata De Vivo, Maria Teresa Landi, Matthew H. Law, Mark M. Iles, Florence Demenais, Rajiv Kumar, Stuart MacGregor, D. Timothy Bishop, Sarah V. Ward, Melissa L. Bondy, Richard Houlston, John K. Wiencke, Beatrice Melin, Jill Barnholtz-Sloan, Ben Kinnersley, Margaret R. Wrensch, Christopher I. Amos, Rayjean J. Hung, Paul Brennan, James McKay, Neil E. Caporaso, Sonja I. Berndt, Brenda M. Birmann, Nicola J. Camp, Peter Kraft, Nathaniel Rothman, Susan L. Slager, Andrew Berchuck, Paul D. P. Pharoah, Thomas A. Sellers, Simon A. Gayther, Celeste L. Pearce, Ellen L. Goode, Joellen M. Schildkraut, Kirsten B. Moysich, Laufey T. Amundadottir, Eric J. Jacobs, Alison P. Klein, Gloria M. Petersen, Harvey A. Risch, Rachel Z. Stolzenberg-Solomon, Brian M. Wolpin, Donghui Li, Rosalind A. Eeles, Christopher A. Haiman, Zsofia Kote-Jarai, Fredrick R. Schumacher, Ali Amin Al Olama, Mark P. Purdue, Ghislaine Scelo, Marlene D. Dalgaard, Mark H. Greene, Tom Grotmol, Peter A. Kanetsky, Katherine A. McGlynn, Katherine L. Nathanson, Clare Turnbull, Fredrik Wiklund, Breast Cancer Association Consortium (BCAC), Barrett’s and Esophageal Adenocarcinoma Consortium (BEACON), Colon Cancer Family Registry (CCFR), Transdisciplinary Studies of Genetic Variation in Colorectal Cancer (CORECT), Endometrial Cancer Association Consortium (ECAC), Genetics and Epidemiology of Colorectal Cancer Consortium (GECCO), Melanoma Genetics Consortium (GenoMEL), Glioma International Case-Control Study (GICC), International Lung Cancer Consortium (ILCCO), Integrative Analysis of Lung Cancer Etiology and Risk (INTEGRAL) Consortium, International Consortium of Investigators Working on Non-Hodgkin’s Lymphoma Epidemiologic Studies (InterLymph), Ovarian Cancer Association Consortium (OCAC), Oral Cancer GWAS, Pancreatic Cancer Case-Control Consortium (PanC4), Pancreatic Cancer Cohort Consortium (PanScan), Prostate Cancer Association Group to Investigate Cancer Associated Alterations in the Genome (PRACTICAL), Renal Cancer GWAS, Testicular Cancer Consortium (TECAC), Stephen J. Chanock, Nilanjan Chatterjee, Montserrat Garcia-Closas
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Nature Portfolio 2020
Materias:
Science
Q
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/043bfd656ef148a0993f50953c04b25f
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
Descripción
Sumario:In cancer many gene variants may contribute to disease etiology, but the impact of a given gene variant may have varied effect size. Here, the authors analyse summary statistics of genome-wide association studies from fourteen cancers, and show the utility of polygenic risk scores may vary depending on cancer type.

Ejemplares similares