Comparison of Two-Phase Porosity Models for High Capacity Random Packing

High capacity random packing is used in absorption applications where a large throughput of gas is required while simultaneously maintaining as low a pressure loss as possible. Utilising computational fluid dynamics to capture the internal flow patterns and transients when designing packed bed tower...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Poulsen Mathias, Sørensen Kim, Condra Thomas
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
FR
Publicado: EDP Sciences 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/0455d1d9d11e4ae1abead51f35df088e
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:0455d1d9d11e4ae1abead51f35df088e
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:0455d1d9d11e4ae1abead51f35df088e2021-11-12T11:44:34ZComparison of Two-Phase Porosity Models for High Capacity Random Packing2267-124210.1051/e3sconf/202132101015https://doaj.org/article/0455d1d9d11e4ae1abead51f35df088e2021-01-01T00:00:00Zhttps://www.e3s-conferences.org/articles/e3sconf/pdf/2021/97/e3sconf_icchmt2021_01015.pdfhttps://doaj.org/toc/2267-1242High capacity random packing is used in absorption applications where a large throughput of gas is required while simultaneously maintaining as low a pressure loss as possible. Utilising computational fluid dynamics to capture the internal flow patterns and transients when designing packed bed towers can be advantageous in respect to expected performance and cost optimisation. However, capturing the direct interaction between gas, liquid and packing is not computationally feasible and therefore the packed bed is modelled as a porous media. In this work four different porosity model are calibrated with idealised equations to data for the high capacity packing IMTP or I-Ring. The different models are evaluated based on their ability to predict pressure loss and liquid holdup in the packed bed. An Eulerian two-phase model with a porous zone representing the packed bed is setup in a cylindrical tower. The CFD results are compared to the predictions of the best performing porosity model. It was found that the best performing model had an absolute mean error of 6.7% when calibrated with the idealised equations. This error increased to 10.5% when the porosity model was implemented into the CFD model.Poulsen MathiasSørensen KimCondra ThomasEDP SciencesarticleEnvironmental sciencesGE1-350ENFRE3S Web of Conferences, Vol 321, p 01015 (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
FR
topic Environmental sciences
GE1-350
spellingShingle Environmental sciences
GE1-350
Poulsen Mathias
Sørensen Kim
Condra Thomas
Comparison of Two-Phase Porosity Models for High Capacity Random Packing
description High capacity random packing is used in absorption applications where a large throughput of gas is required while simultaneously maintaining as low a pressure loss as possible. Utilising computational fluid dynamics to capture the internal flow patterns and transients when designing packed bed towers can be advantageous in respect to expected performance and cost optimisation. However, capturing the direct interaction between gas, liquid and packing is not computationally feasible and therefore the packed bed is modelled as a porous media. In this work four different porosity model are calibrated with idealised equations to data for the high capacity packing IMTP or I-Ring. The different models are evaluated based on their ability to predict pressure loss and liquid holdup in the packed bed. An Eulerian two-phase model with a porous zone representing the packed bed is setup in a cylindrical tower. The CFD results are compared to the predictions of the best performing porosity model. It was found that the best performing model had an absolute mean error of 6.7% when calibrated with the idealised equations. This error increased to 10.5% when the porosity model was implemented into the CFD model.
format article
author Poulsen Mathias
Sørensen Kim
Condra Thomas
author_facet Poulsen Mathias
Sørensen Kim
Condra Thomas
author_sort Poulsen Mathias
title Comparison of Two-Phase Porosity Models for High Capacity Random Packing
title_short Comparison of Two-Phase Porosity Models for High Capacity Random Packing
title_full Comparison of Two-Phase Porosity Models for High Capacity Random Packing
title_fullStr Comparison of Two-Phase Porosity Models for High Capacity Random Packing
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Two-Phase Porosity Models for High Capacity Random Packing
title_sort comparison of two-phase porosity models for high capacity random packing
publisher EDP Sciences
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/0455d1d9d11e4ae1abead51f35df088e
work_keys_str_mv AT poulsenmathias comparisonoftwophaseporositymodelsforhighcapacityrandompacking
AT sørensenkim comparisonoftwophaseporositymodelsforhighcapacityrandompacking
AT condrathomas comparisonoftwophaseporositymodelsforhighcapacityrandompacking
_version_ 1718430536571027456