'If only we knew what they wanted': bridging the gap between student uncertainty and lecturers' expectations

It is increasingly accepted that the development of the academic writing required to succeed in higher education is most effective when embedded within the discipline in which students are studying and when integrated with formal teaching. The many initiatives and programmes discussed in this journa...

Description complète

Enregistré dans:
Détails bibliographiques
Auteurs principaux: Anna Magyar, Daniel McAvoy, Kathrin Forstner
Format: article
Langue:EN
Publié: Association for Learning Development in Higher Education (ALDinHE) 2011
Sujets:
Accès en ligne:https://doaj.org/article/04a1bc94fc0e4848bd27b1c03d43e8c2
Tags: Ajouter un tag
Pas de tags, Soyez le premier à ajouter un tag!
id oai:doaj.org-article:04a1bc94fc0e4848bd27b1c03d43e8c2
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:04a1bc94fc0e4848bd27b1c03d43e8c22021-11-29T14:04:22Z'If only we knew what they wanted': bridging the gap between student uncertainty and lecturers' expectations10.47408/jldhe.v0i3.681759-667Xhttps://doaj.org/article/04a1bc94fc0e4848bd27b1c03d43e8c22011-04-01T00:00:00Zhttps://repl.gianfj.com/index.php/jldhe/article/view/68https://doaj.org/toc/1759-667XIt is increasingly accepted that the development of the academic writing required to succeed in higher education is most effective when embedded within the discipline in which students are studying and when integrated with formal teaching. The many initiatives and programmes discussed in this journal suggest a variety of models and collaborations in the move from generic study skills to the integration of writing in the disciplines. As a contribution to this, we discuss the evaluation of an academic writing module for Masters students in the School for International Development at the University of East Anglia. The module was devised collaboratively by the learning developer, subject specialist and postgraduate research students from the department. It was delivered by postgraduate research students, who also participated in its evaluation. The evaluation led to changes not only in the writing module itself but to the main Masters programme. We argue that the post graduate research students played a key role in these changes and that through dialogue between students and the department, academics who were only peripherally involved, nonetheless gained insights about students experience, potentially informing their future practice.   Anna MagyarDaniel McAvoyKathrin ForstnerAssociation for Learning Development in Higher Education (ALDinHE)articleAcademic literaciesWriting developmentCollaborative Learning DevelopmentPeer assisted learningTheory and practice of educationLB5-3640ENJournal of Learning Development in Higher Education, Iss 3 (2011)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic Academic literacies
Writing development
Collaborative Learning Development
Peer assisted learning
Theory and practice of education
LB5-3640
spellingShingle Academic literacies
Writing development
Collaborative Learning Development
Peer assisted learning
Theory and practice of education
LB5-3640
Anna Magyar
Daniel McAvoy
Kathrin Forstner
'If only we knew what they wanted': bridging the gap between student uncertainty and lecturers' expectations
description It is increasingly accepted that the development of the academic writing required to succeed in higher education is most effective when embedded within the discipline in which students are studying and when integrated with formal teaching. The many initiatives and programmes discussed in this journal suggest a variety of models and collaborations in the move from generic study skills to the integration of writing in the disciplines. As a contribution to this, we discuss the evaluation of an academic writing module for Masters students in the School for International Development at the University of East Anglia. The module was devised collaboratively by the learning developer, subject specialist and postgraduate research students from the department. It was delivered by postgraduate research students, who also participated in its evaluation. The evaluation led to changes not only in the writing module itself but to the main Masters programme. We argue that the post graduate research students played a key role in these changes and that through dialogue between students and the department, academics who were only peripherally involved, nonetheless gained insights about students experience, potentially informing their future practice.  
format article
author Anna Magyar
Daniel McAvoy
Kathrin Forstner
author_facet Anna Magyar
Daniel McAvoy
Kathrin Forstner
author_sort Anna Magyar
title 'If only we knew what they wanted': bridging the gap between student uncertainty and lecturers' expectations
title_short 'If only we knew what they wanted': bridging the gap between student uncertainty and lecturers' expectations
title_full 'If only we knew what they wanted': bridging the gap between student uncertainty and lecturers' expectations
title_fullStr 'If only we knew what they wanted': bridging the gap between student uncertainty and lecturers' expectations
title_full_unstemmed 'If only we knew what they wanted': bridging the gap between student uncertainty and lecturers' expectations
title_sort 'if only we knew what they wanted': bridging the gap between student uncertainty and lecturers' expectations
publisher Association for Learning Development in Higher Education (ALDinHE)
publishDate 2011
url https://doaj.org/article/04a1bc94fc0e4848bd27b1c03d43e8c2
work_keys_str_mv AT annamagyar ifonlyweknewwhattheywantedbridgingthegapbetweenstudentuncertaintyandlecturersexpectations
AT danielmcavoy ifonlyweknewwhattheywantedbridgingthegapbetweenstudentuncertaintyandlecturersexpectations
AT kathrinforstner ifonlyweknewwhattheywantedbridgingthegapbetweenstudentuncertaintyandlecturersexpectations
_version_ 1718407205066113024