Transnasal humidified rapid insufflation ventilatory exchange vs. facemask oxygenation in elderly patients undergoing general anaesthesia: a randomized controlled trial

Abstract Transnasal humidified rapid insufflation ventilator exchange (THRIVE) may be effective in delaying hypoxia, but the efficacy of THRIVE for oxygenation in elderly patients under general anaesthesia has not been assessed. This study assessed whether THRIVE prolonged the apnoea time in the eld...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zhen Hua, Zhen Liu, Yang Li, Hongye Zhang, Ming Yang, Mingzhang Zuo
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Nature Portfolio 2020
Materias:
R
Q
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/04ac3364ab2e4d9f8d408f8f3184b93d
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:04ac3364ab2e4d9f8d408f8f3184b93d
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:04ac3364ab2e4d9f8d408f8f3184b93d2021-12-02T18:17:42ZTransnasal humidified rapid insufflation ventilatory exchange vs. facemask oxygenation in elderly patients undergoing general anaesthesia: a randomized controlled trial10.1038/s41598-020-62716-22045-2322https://doaj.org/article/04ac3364ab2e4d9f8d408f8f3184b93d2020-04-01T00:00:00Zhttps://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-62716-2https://doaj.org/toc/2045-2322Abstract Transnasal humidified rapid insufflation ventilator exchange (THRIVE) may be effective in delaying hypoxia, but the efficacy of THRIVE for oxygenation in elderly patients under general anaesthesia has not been assessed. This study assessed whether THRIVE prolonged the apnoea time in the elderly patients after induction. This was a single centre, two-group, randomized controlled trial. 60 patients (65 to 80 years of age) with American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) grades I ~ III who required tracheal intubation or the application of a laryngeal mask under general anaesthesia were randomly allocated to receive oxygenation using THRIVE (100% oxygen, 30~70 litres min−1) or a facemask (100% oxygen, 10 litres min−1) during the pre-oxygenation period and during apnoea. The apnoea time, which was defined as the time from the cessation of spontaneous breathing until the SpO2 decreased to 90% or the apnoea time reached 10 minutes was recorded as the primary outcome. No significant differences were found on the baseline characteristics between the groups. The apnoea time was significantly increased (P < 0.01) in the THRIVE group. The median (interquartile range) apnoea times were 600 (600–600) s in the THRIVE group and 600 (231.5–600) s in the facemask group. No significant differences were found in the PaO2, PaCO2 and vital parameters between the THRIVE and facemask groups. No increased occurrence of complications, including haemodynamic instability, resistant arrhythmia or nasal discomfort, were reported in both the THRIVE group and the facemask group. THRIVE prolongs the apnoea time in elderly patients. THRIVE may be a more effective method for pre-oxygenation than a facemask in the elderly without pulmonary dysfunction.Zhen HuaZhen LiuYang LiHongye ZhangMing YangMingzhang ZuoNature PortfolioarticleMedicineRScienceQENScientific Reports, Vol 10, Iss 1, Pp 1-8 (2020)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic Medicine
R
Science
Q
spellingShingle Medicine
R
Science
Q
Zhen Hua
Zhen Liu
Yang Li
Hongye Zhang
Ming Yang
Mingzhang Zuo
Transnasal humidified rapid insufflation ventilatory exchange vs. facemask oxygenation in elderly patients undergoing general anaesthesia: a randomized controlled trial
description Abstract Transnasal humidified rapid insufflation ventilator exchange (THRIVE) may be effective in delaying hypoxia, but the efficacy of THRIVE for oxygenation in elderly patients under general anaesthesia has not been assessed. This study assessed whether THRIVE prolonged the apnoea time in the elderly patients after induction. This was a single centre, two-group, randomized controlled trial. 60 patients (65 to 80 years of age) with American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) grades I ~ III who required tracheal intubation or the application of a laryngeal mask under general anaesthesia were randomly allocated to receive oxygenation using THRIVE (100% oxygen, 30~70 litres min−1) or a facemask (100% oxygen, 10 litres min−1) during the pre-oxygenation period and during apnoea. The apnoea time, which was defined as the time from the cessation of spontaneous breathing until the SpO2 decreased to 90% or the apnoea time reached 10 minutes was recorded as the primary outcome. No significant differences were found on the baseline characteristics between the groups. The apnoea time was significantly increased (P < 0.01) in the THRIVE group. The median (interquartile range) apnoea times were 600 (600–600) s in the THRIVE group and 600 (231.5–600) s in the facemask group. No significant differences were found in the PaO2, PaCO2 and vital parameters between the THRIVE and facemask groups. No increased occurrence of complications, including haemodynamic instability, resistant arrhythmia or nasal discomfort, were reported in both the THRIVE group and the facemask group. THRIVE prolongs the apnoea time in elderly patients. THRIVE may be a more effective method for pre-oxygenation than a facemask in the elderly without pulmonary dysfunction.
format article
author Zhen Hua
Zhen Liu
Yang Li
Hongye Zhang
Ming Yang
Mingzhang Zuo
author_facet Zhen Hua
Zhen Liu
Yang Li
Hongye Zhang
Ming Yang
Mingzhang Zuo
author_sort Zhen Hua
title Transnasal humidified rapid insufflation ventilatory exchange vs. facemask oxygenation in elderly patients undergoing general anaesthesia: a randomized controlled trial
title_short Transnasal humidified rapid insufflation ventilatory exchange vs. facemask oxygenation in elderly patients undergoing general anaesthesia: a randomized controlled trial
title_full Transnasal humidified rapid insufflation ventilatory exchange vs. facemask oxygenation in elderly patients undergoing general anaesthesia: a randomized controlled trial
title_fullStr Transnasal humidified rapid insufflation ventilatory exchange vs. facemask oxygenation in elderly patients undergoing general anaesthesia: a randomized controlled trial
title_full_unstemmed Transnasal humidified rapid insufflation ventilatory exchange vs. facemask oxygenation in elderly patients undergoing general anaesthesia: a randomized controlled trial
title_sort transnasal humidified rapid insufflation ventilatory exchange vs. facemask oxygenation in elderly patients undergoing general anaesthesia: a randomized controlled trial
publisher Nature Portfolio
publishDate 2020
url https://doaj.org/article/04ac3364ab2e4d9f8d408f8f3184b93d
work_keys_str_mv AT zhenhua transnasalhumidifiedrapidinsufflationventilatoryexchangevsfacemaskoxygenationinelderlypatientsundergoinggeneralanaesthesiaarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT zhenliu transnasalhumidifiedrapidinsufflationventilatoryexchangevsfacemaskoxygenationinelderlypatientsundergoinggeneralanaesthesiaarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT yangli transnasalhumidifiedrapidinsufflationventilatoryexchangevsfacemaskoxygenationinelderlypatientsundergoinggeneralanaesthesiaarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT hongyezhang transnasalhumidifiedrapidinsufflationventilatoryexchangevsfacemaskoxygenationinelderlypatientsundergoinggeneralanaesthesiaarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT mingyang transnasalhumidifiedrapidinsufflationventilatoryexchangevsfacemaskoxygenationinelderlypatientsundergoinggeneralanaesthesiaarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT mingzhangzuo transnasalhumidifiedrapidinsufflationventilatoryexchangevsfacemaskoxygenationinelderlypatientsundergoinggeneralanaesthesiaarandomizedcontrolledtrial
_version_ 1718378255489171456