Linguopolitical Personology (Metaphorical Perspective of Research)

The article was accomplished at the intersection of such relevant areas of modern linguistics as political linguistics, linguistic personology and linguistic metaphorology. The purpose of the article is to provide an overview of the work of foreign and domestic linguists for 2009-2019, devoted to th...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales:	O. N. Kondratyeva, V. A. Kameneva
Formato:	article
Lenguaje:	RU
Publicado:	Tsentr nauchnykh i obrazovatelnykh proektov 2020
Materias:	political communication political discourse linguopolitical personology Slavic languages. Baltic languages. Albanian languages PG1-9665
Acceso en línea:	https://doaj.org/article/04fc26ca108c48149f1de61d54a713d9
Etiquetas:	Agregar Etiqueta Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!

id	oai:doaj.org-article:04fc26ca108c48149f1de61d54a713d9
record_format	dspace
spelling	oai:doaj.org-article:04fc26ca108c48149f1de61d54a713d92021-12-02T07:58:09ZLinguopolitical Personology (Metaphorical Perspective of Research)2225-756X2227-129510.24224/2227-1295-2020-1-78-96https://doaj.org/article/04fc26ca108c48149f1de61d54a713d92020-01-01T00:00:00Zhttps://www.nauka-dialog.ru/jour/article/view/128https://doaj.org/toc/2225-756Xhttps://doaj.org/toc/2227-1295The article was accomplished at the intersection of such relevant areas of modern linguistics as political linguistics, linguistic personology and linguistic metaphorology. The purpose of the article is to provide an overview of the work of foreign and domestic linguists for 2009-2019, devoted to the analysis of metaphorical models in the idiolics of politicians, to identify the main trends in research of this kind. The analysis showed that linguistic-personal research on metaphorics in political communication is carried out in a cognitive, pragmatic, stylistic, rhetorical, semiotic, psycholinguistic perspectives. It was revealed that according to the criterion “object of analysis” they can be characterized in territorial, status, ideological, gender, chronological, temporal and comparative aspects. The analytical review presented in the article demonstrates that there is a research asymmetry in modern linguistic-political personology: the work on federal politicians predominates over the work on regional politicians, the work on representatives of the political elite over the work on political opposition, the work on male politicians over the work on politicians - women, work on existing politicians - on work on the great politicians of the past. The authors believe that due to the indicated asymmetry in the objects of research, the task of linguopolitical personology should be to fill in the existing gaps.O. N. KondratyevaV. A. KamenevaTsentr nauchnykh i obrazovatelnykh proektovarticlepolitical communicationpolitical discourselinguopolitical personologySlavic languages. Baltic languages. Albanian languagesPG1-9665RUНаучный диалог, Vol 0, Iss 1, Pp 78-96 (2020)
institution	DOAJ
collection	DOAJ
language	RU
topic	political communication political discourse linguopolitical personology Slavic languages. Baltic languages. Albanian languages PG1-9665
spellingShingle	political communication political discourse linguopolitical personology Slavic languages. Baltic languages. Albanian languages PG1-9665 O. N. Kondratyeva V. A. Kameneva Linguopolitical Personology (Metaphorical Perspective of Research)
description	The article was accomplished at the intersection of such relevant areas of modern linguistics as political linguistics, linguistic personology and linguistic metaphorology. The purpose of the article is to provide an overview of the work of foreign and domestic linguists for 2009-2019, devoted to the analysis of metaphorical models in the idiolics of politicians, to identify the main trends in research of this kind. The analysis showed that linguistic-personal research on metaphorics in political communication is carried out in a cognitive, pragmatic, stylistic, rhetorical, semiotic, psycholinguistic perspectives. It was revealed that according to the criterion “object of analysis” they can be characterized in territorial, status, ideological, gender, chronological, temporal and comparative aspects. The analytical review presented in the article demonstrates that there is a research asymmetry in modern linguistic-political personology: the work on federal politicians predominates over the work on regional politicians, the work on representatives of the political elite over the work on political opposition, the work on male politicians over the work on politicians - women, work on existing politicians - on work on the great politicians of the past. The authors believe that due to the indicated asymmetry in the objects of research, the task of linguopolitical personology should be to fill in the existing gaps.
format	article
author	O. N. Kondratyeva V. A. Kameneva
author_facet	O. N. Kondratyeva V. A. Kameneva
author_sort	O. N. Kondratyeva
title	Linguopolitical Personology (Metaphorical Perspective of Research)
title_short	Linguopolitical Personology (Metaphorical Perspective of Research)
title_full	Linguopolitical Personology (Metaphorical Perspective of Research)
title_fullStr	Linguopolitical Personology (Metaphorical Perspective of Research)
title_full_unstemmed	Linguopolitical Personology (Metaphorical Perspective of Research)
title_sort	linguopolitical personology (metaphorical perspective of research)
publisher	Tsentr nauchnykh i obrazovatelnykh proektov
publishDate	2020
url	https://doaj.org/article/04fc26ca108c48149f1de61d54a713d9
work_keys_str_mv	AT onkondratyeva linguopoliticalpersonologymetaphoricalperspectiveofresearch AT vakameneva linguopoliticalpersonologymetaphoricalperspectiveofresearch
_version_	1718398829272760320

Linguopolitical Personology (Metaphorical Perspective of Research)

Ejemplares similares