Comparative gait analysis of patients with different design of total knee arthroplasty

Introduction/Objective. The essence of the treatment of degenerative knee joint diseases is pain relief, restoring motion range and stability of knee joints. Methods. In this study, 35 patients participated after having surgery of the knee joint. The patients had a posterior-stabilized (PS) endopros...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales:	Prodanović Nikola, Petrović-Savić Suzana, Devedžić Goran, Matić Aleksandar, Radovanović Dragče, Ristić Branko
Formato:	article
Lenguaje:	EN SR
Publicado:	Serbian Medical Society 2021
Materias:	gait analysis gait kinematics gonarthrosis ps endoprosthesis cr endoprosthesis Medicine R
Acceso en línea:	https://doaj.org/article/051449c033d14b6a9510ec65a153d9c9
Etiquetas:	Agregar Etiqueta Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!

id	oai:doaj.org-article:051449c033d14b6a9510ec65a153d9c9
record_format	dspace
spelling	oai:doaj.org-article:051449c033d14b6a9510ec65a153d9c92021-11-10T07:28:09ZComparative gait analysis of patients with different design of total knee arthroplasty0370-81792406-089510.2298/SARH200706046Phttps://doaj.org/article/051449c033d14b6a9510ec65a153d9c92021-01-01T00:00:00Zhttp://www.doiserbia.nb.rs/img/doi/0370-8179/2021/0370-81792100046P.pdfhttps://doaj.org/toc/0370-8179https://doaj.org/toc/2406-0895Introduction/Objective. The essence of the treatment of degenerative knee joint diseases is pain relief, restoring motion range and stability of knee joints. Methods. In this study, 35 patients participated after having surgery of the knee joint. The patients had a posterior-stabilized (PS) endoprosthesis in one joint, and a posterior cruciate ligament retaining (CR) endoprosthesis in the other. Kinematic data was collected using a 3D optical system for tracking fluorescent markers in time. Based on these data, the following parameters were determined: degree of flexion, mediolateral (ML) translation, lateral gap, medial gap, and the angle of change between the transtibial and transfemoral axes. Results. The results show a more pronounced flexion degree with the PS prosthesis compared to the CR prosthesis. Also, the results show negligible values of the ML translation, lateral gap, and medial gap in both types of prostheses. Using the non-parameter Wilcoxon test, a substantial difference in the angle change between the transtibial and transfemoral axes was confirmed, that is, in the flexion angles on the CR and PS prostheses. Conclusion. This study shows that there is no great difference in the use of the PS or CR designs of endoprostheses. Better behavior and range of motion in the knee joint were established with the implantation of the PS endoprosthesis. This conclusion is confirmed by the substantial difference in the degree of flexion of the knee joint and in the position of the transversal axes of the tibia and femur.Prodanović NikolaPetrović-Savić SuzanaDevedžić GoranMatić AleksandarRadovanović DragčeRistić BrankoSerbian Medical Societyarticlegait analysisgait kinematicsgonarthrosisps endoprosthesiscr endoprosthesisMedicineRENSRSrpski Arhiv za Celokupno Lekarstvo, Vol 149, Iss 9-10, Pp 579-584 (2021)
institution	DOAJ
collection	DOAJ
language	EN SR
topic	gait analysis gait kinematics gonarthrosis ps endoprosthesis cr endoprosthesis Medicine R
spellingShingle	gait analysis gait kinematics gonarthrosis ps endoprosthesis cr endoprosthesis Medicine R Prodanović Nikola Petrović-Savić Suzana Devedžić Goran Matić Aleksandar Radovanović Dragče Ristić Branko Comparative gait analysis of patients with different design of total knee arthroplasty
description	Introduction/Objective. The essence of the treatment of degenerative knee joint diseases is pain relief, restoring motion range and stability of knee joints. Methods. In this study, 35 patients participated after having surgery of the knee joint. The patients had a posterior-stabilized (PS) endoprosthesis in one joint, and a posterior cruciate ligament retaining (CR) endoprosthesis in the other. Kinematic data was collected using a 3D optical system for tracking fluorescent markers in time. Based on these data, the following parameters were determined: degree of flexion, mediolateral (ML) translation, lateral gap, medial gap, and the angle of change between the transtibial and transfemoral axes. Results. The results show a more pronounced flexion degree with the PS prosthesis compared to the CR prosthesis. Also, the results show negligible values of the ML translation, lateral gap, and medial gap in both types of prostheses. Using the non-parameter Wilcoxon test, a substantial difference in the angle change between the transtibial and transfemoral axes was confirmed, that is, in the flexion angles on the CR and PS prostheses. Conclusion. This study shows that there is no great difference in the use of the PS or CR designs of endoprostheses. Better behavior and range of motion in the knee joint were established with the implantation of the PS endoprosthesis. This conclusion is confirmed by the substantial difference in the degree of flexion of the knee joint and in the position of the transversal axes of the tibia and femur.
format	article
author	Prodanović Nikola Petrović-Savić Suzana Devedžić Goran Matić Aleksandar Radovanović Dragče Ristić Branko
author_facet	Prodanović Nikola Petrović-Savić Suzana Devedžić Goran Matić Aleksandar Radovanović Dragče Ristić Branko
author_sort	Prodanović Nikola
title	Comparative gait analysis of patients with different design of total knee arthroplasty
title_short	Comparative gait analysis of patients with different design of total knee arthroplasty
title_full	Comparative gait analysis of patients with different design of total knee arthroplasty
title_fullStr	Comparative gait analysis of patients with different design of total knee arthroplasty
title_full_unstemmed	Comparative gait analysis of patients with different design of total knee arthroplasty
title_sort	comparative gait analysis of patients with different design of total knee arthroplasty
publisher	Serbian Medical Society
publishDate	2021
url	https://doaj.org/article/051449c033d14b6a9510ec65a153d9c9
work_keys_str_mv	AT prodanovicnikola comparativegaitanalysisofpatientswithdifferentdesignoftotalkneearthroplasty AT petrovicsavicsuzana comparativegaitanalysisofpatientswithdifferentdesignoftotalkneearthroplasty AT devedzicgoran comparativegaitanalysisofpatientswithdifferentdesignoftotalkneearthroplasty AT maticaleksandar comparativegaitanalysisofpatientswithdifferentdesignoftotalkneearthroplasty AT radovanovicdragce comparativegaitanalysisofpatientswithdifferentdesignoftotalkneearthroplasty AT risticbranko comparativegaitanalysisofpatientswithdifferentdesignoftotalkneearthroplasty
_version_	1718440437028487168

Comparative gait analysis of patients with different design of total knee arthroplasty

Ejemplares similares