Analysis and calculation of sediment scouring rate at different locations of storm sewer

To explore the migration differences of sediments at the front, middle, and end sections of a storm sewer when scoured by water, and further evaluate the pollution load, the scouring process of sediments at different locations of a storm sewer was simulated and mathematical models were built to calc...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Cuiyun Liu, Wenke Lv, Qi Liu, Jie Zhou, Yiyang Wang, Xiaohua Zhang, Jun Zhou
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: IWA Publishing 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/053e31c762ef49c28e76c7a251cb5f51
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:053e31c762ef49c28e76c7a251cb5f51
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:053e31c762ef49c28e76c7a251cb5f512021-11-06T11:22:08ZAnalysis and calculation of sediment scouring rate at different locations of storm sewer0273-12231996-973210.2166/wst.2021.334https://doaj.org/article/053e31c762ef49c28e76c7a251cb5f512021-09-01T00:00:00Zhttp://wst.iwaponline.com/content/84/6/1340https://doaj.org/toc/0273-1223https://doaj.org/toc/1996-9732To explore the migration differences of sediments at the front, middle, and end sections of a storm sewer when scoured by water, and further evaluate the pollution load, the scouring process of sediments at different locations of a storm sewer was simulated and mathematical models were built to calculate the scouring rate. Results show that scouring rate is affected by sediment particle size, pipeline slope, sediment thickness, and water flow velocity. As the slope increased, scouring rate at the end section increased more obviously. The scouring rate at the front section slightly decreased with increasing sediment thickness, but opposite trends were observed at the middle and end sections. When the particle size (0.33 mm–0.83 mm) and flow velocity (0.15 m/s–0.65 m/s) increased within their ranges, scouring rate increased across all three locations. Models for calculating scouring rate were established via two data fitting. The calculated values were compared with measured values at a scouring time of 1 min. Under different particle sizes, the difference between the calculated and measured values at front, middle, and end sections were in the ranges of −0.63% to 0.63%, −0.01% to 0.02%, and −0.13% to 0.16%, respectively, all of which showed good consistency. HIGHLIGHTS The increase of scouring rate at end section is more obvious as slope increases.; Scouring rate of all the three locations increases with flow velocity increasing.; Scouring rate is great when particle size is big (d50 = 0.33–0.83 mm).; Scouring rate at different locations in a storm sewer is calculated using models.; Difference between the calculated and measured values is from −0.63% to 0.63%.;Cuiyun LiuWenke LvQi LiuJie ZhouYiyang WangXiaohua ZhangJun ZhouIWA Publishingarticlecalculation modelscouring ratesedimentstorm sewerEnvironmental technology. Sanitary engineeringTD1-1066ENWater Science and Technology, Vol 84, Iss 6, Pp 1340-1353 (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic calculation model
scouring rate
sediment
storm sewer
Environmental technology. Sanitary engineering
TD1-1066
spellingShingle calculation model
scouring rate
sediment
storm sewer
Environmental technology. Sanitary engineering
TD1-1066
Cuiyun Liu
Wenke Lv
Qi Liu
Jie Zhou
Yiyang Wang
Xiaohua Zhang
Jun Zhou
Analysis and calculation of sediment scouring rate at different locations of storm sewer
description To explore the migration differences of sediments at the front, middle, and end sections of a storm sewer when scoured by water, and further evaluate the pollution load, the scouring process of sediments at different locations of a storm sewer was simulated and mathematical models were built to calculate the scouring rate. Results show that scouring rate is affected by sediment particle size, pipeline slope, sediment thickness, and water flow velocity. As the slope increased, scouring rate at the end section increased more obviously. The scouring rate at the front section slightly decreased with increasing sediment thickness, but opposite trends were observed at the middle and end sections. When the particle size (0.33 mm–0.83 mm) and flow velocity (0.15 m/s–0.65 m/s) increased within their ranges, scouring rate increased across all three locations. Models for calculating scouring rate were established via two data fitting. The calculated values were compared with measured values at a scouring time of 1 min. Under different particle sizes, the difference between the calculated and measured values at front, middle, and end sections were in the ranges of −0.63% to 0.63%, −0.01% to 0.02%, and −0.13% to 0.16%, respectively, all of which showed good consistency. HIGHLIGHTS The increase of scouring rate at end section is more obvious as slope increases.; Scouring rate of all the three locations increases with flow velocity increasing.; Scouring rate is great when particle size is big (d50 = 0.33–0.83 mm).; Scouring rate at different locations in a storm sewer is calculated using models.; Difference between the calculated and measured values is from −0.63% to 0.63%.;
format article
author Cuiyun Liu
Wenke Lv
Qi Liu
Jie Zhou
Yiyang Wang
Xiaohua Zhang
Jun Zhou
author_facet Cuiyun Liu
Wenke Lv
Qi Liu
Jie Zhou
Yiyang Wang
Xiaohua Zhang
Jun Zhou
author_sort Cuiyun Liu
title Analysis and calculation of sediment scouring rate at different locations of storm sewer
title_short Analysis and calculation of sediment scouring rate at different locations of storm sewer
title_full Analysis and calculation of sediment scouring rate at different locations of storm sewer
title_fullStr Analysis and calculation of sediment scouring rate at different locations of storm sewer
title_full_unstemmed Analysis and calculation of sediment scouring rate at different locations of storm sewer
title_sort analysis and calculation of sediment scouring rate at different locations of storm sewer
publisher IWA Publishing
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/053e31c762ef49c28e76c7a251cb5f51
work_keys_str_mv AT cuiyunliu analysisandcalculationofsedimentscouringrateatdifferentlocationsofstormsewer
AT wenkelv analysisandcalculationofsedimentscouringrateatdifferentlocationsofstormsewer
AT qiliu analysisandcalculationofsedimentscouringrateatdifferentlocationsofstormsewer
AT jiezhou analysisandcalculationofsedimentscouringrateatdifferentlocationsofstormsewer
AT yiyangwang analysisandcalculationofsedimentscouringrateatdifferentlocationsofstormsewer
AT xiaohuazhang analysisandcalculationofsedimentscouringrateatdifferentlocationsofstormsewer
AT junzhou analysisandcalculationofsedimentscouringrateatdifferentlocationsofstormsewer
_version_ 1718443650754543616