Bridging the gaps: How students seek disciplinary coherence in introductory physics for life science

Students in one discipline often receive their scientific training from faculty in other disciplines. As a result of tacit disciplinary differences, especially as implemented in courses at the introductory college level, such students can have difficulty in understanding the nature of the knowledge...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Benjamin D. Geller, Julia Gouvea, Benjamin W. Dreyfus, Vashti Sawtelle, Chandra Turpen, Edward F. Redish
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: American Physical Society 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/05f2bb9248094756ae1a56c3cd210c3c
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:05f2bb9248094756ae1a56c3cd210c3c
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:05f2bb9248094756ae1a56c3cd210c3c2021-12-02T12:07:04ZBridging the gaps: How students seek disciplinary coherence in introductory physics for life science10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.15.0201422469-9896https://doaj.org/article/05f2bb9248094756ae1a56c3cd210c3c2019-11-01T00:00:00Zhttp://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.15.020142http://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.15.020142https://doaj.org/toc/2469-9896Students in one discipline often receive their scientific training from faculty in other disciplines. As a result of tacit disciplinary differences, especially as implemented in courses at the introductory college level, such students can have difficulty in understanding the nature of the knowledge they are learning in a discipline that they do not identify as their own. We developed a course in introductory physics for life science (IPLS) students that attempts to help them cross disciplinary boundaries. By analyzing student reasoning during recitation sections and interviews, we identified three broad ways in which students in our course meaningfully crossed boundaries: (i) by unpacking biochemical heuristics in terms of underlying physical interactions, (ii) by locating both biochemical and physical concepts within a mathematical bridging expression, and (iii) by coordinating functional and mechanistic explanations for the same biological phenomenon. Drawing on episodes from case-study interviews and in-class problem-solving sessions, we illustrate how each of these types of boundary crossing involves the coordination of students’ conceptual and epistemological resources from physics, chemistry, and biology in distinct but complementary ways. Together, these boundary crossing categories form a theoretical framework for classifying student coherence seeking. We explore how the IPLS course helps our life science students fill in the gaps that exist between traditional introductory courses, by finding and exploring questions that might otherwise fall through disciplinary cracks. By identifying these types of explanatory coherence, we hope to suggest ways of inviting life science students to participate in physics and see physics as a tool for making sense of the living world.Benjamin D. GellerJulia GouveaBenjamin W. DreyfusVashti SawtelleChandra TurpenEdward F. RedishAmerican Physical SocietyarticleSpecial aspects of educationLC8-6691PhysicsQC1-999ENPhysical Review Physics Education Research, Vol 15, Iss 2, p 020142 (2019)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic Special aspects of education
LC8-6691
Physics
QC1-999
spellingShingle Special aspects of education
LC8-6691
Physics
QC1-999
Benjamin D. Geller
Julia Gouvea
Benjamin W. Dreyfus
Vashti Sawtelle
Chandra Turpen
Edward F. Redish
Bridging the gaps: How students seek disciplinary coherence in introductory physics for life science
description Students in one discipline often receive their scientific training from faculty in other disciplines. As a result of tacit disciplinary differences, especially as implemented in courses at the introductory college level, such students can have difficulty in understanding the nature of the knowledge they are learning in a discipline that they do not identify as their own. We developed a course in introductory physics for life science (IPLS) students that attempts to help them cross disciplinary boundaries. By analyzing student reasoning during recitation sections and interviews, we identified three broad ways in which students in our course meaningfully crossed boundaries: (i) by unpacking biochemical heuristics in terms of underlying physical interactions, (ii) by locating both biochemical and physical concepts within a mathematical bridging expression, and (iii) by coordinating functional and mechanistic explanations for the same biological phenomenon. Drawing on episodes from case-study interviews and in-class problem-solving sessions, we illustrate how each of these types of boundary crossing involves the coordination of students’ conceptual and epistemological resources from physics, chemistry, and biology in distinct but complementary ways. Together, these boundary crossing categories form a theoretical framework for classifying student coherence seeking. We explore how the IPLS course helps our life science students fill in the gaps that exist between traditional introductory courses, by finding and exploring questions that might otherwise fall through disciplinary cracks. By identifying these types of explanatory coherence, we hope to suggest ways of inviting life science students to participate in physics and see physics as a tool for making sense of the living world.
format article
author Benjamin D. Geller
Julia Gouvea
Benjamin W. Dreyfus
Vashti Sawtelle
Chandra Turpen
Edward F. Redish
author_facet Benjamin D. Geller
Julia Gouvea
Benjamin W. Dreyfus
Vashti Sawtelle
Chandra Turpen
Edward F. Redish
author_sort Benjamin D. Geller
title Bridging the gaps: How students seek disciplinary coherence in introductory physics for life science
title_short Bridging the gaps: How students seek disciplinary coherence in introductory physics for life science
title_full Bridging the gaps: How students seek disciplinary coherence in introductory physics for life science
title_fullStr Bridging the gaps: How students seek disciplinary coherence in introductory physics for life science
title_full_unstemmed Bridging the gaps: How students seek disciplinary coherence in introductory physics for life science
title_sort bridging the gaps: how students seek disciplinary coherence in introductory physics for life science
publisher American Physical Society
publishDate 2019
url https://doaj.org/article/05f2bb9248094756ae1a56c3cd210c3c
work_keys_str_mv AT benjamindgeller bridgingthegapshowstudentsseekdisciplinarycoherenceinintroductoryphysicsforlifescience
AT juliagouvea bridgingthegapshowstudentsseekdisciplinarycoherenceinintroductoryphysicsforlifescience
AT benjaminwdreyfus bridgingthegapshowstudentsseekdisciplinarycoherenceinintroductoryphysicsforlifescience
AT vashtisawtelle bridgingthegapshowstudentsseekdisciplinarycoherenceinintroductoryphysicsforlifescience
AT chandraturpen bridgingthegapshowstudentsseekdisciplinarycoherenceinintroductoryphysicsforlifescience
AT edwardfredish bridgingthegapshowstudentsseekdisciplinarycoherenceinintroductoryphysicsforlifescience
_version_ 1718394672241442816