Continuous Electrical Monitoring in Patients with Arrhythmic Myocarditis: Insights from a Referral Center

Background. The incidence and burden of arrhythmias in myocarditis are under-reported. Objective. We aimed to assess the diagnostic yield and clinical impact of continuous arrhythmia monitoring (CAM) in patients with arrhythmic myocarditis. Methods. We enrolled consecutive adult patients (<i>n...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Giovanni Peretto, Patrizio Mazzone, Gabriele Paglino, Alessandra Marzi, Georgios Tsitsinakis, Stefania Rizzo, Cristina Basso, Paolo Della Bella, Simone Sala
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: MDPI AG 2021
Materias:
R
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/05fada0fdce049a0a8d42f4f8d28171b
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:05fada0fdce049a0a8d42f4f8d28171b
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:05fada0fdce049a0a8d42f4f8d28171b2021-11-11T17:45:54ZContinuous Electrical Monitoring in Patients with Arrhythmic Myocarditis: Insights from a Referral Center10.3390/jcm102151422077-0383https://doaj.org/article/05fada0fdce049a0a8d42f4f8d28171b2021-11-01T00:00:00Zhttps://www.mdpi.com/2077-0383/10/21/5142https://doaj.org/toc/2077-0383Background. The incidence and burden of arrhythmias in myocarditis are under-reported. Objective. We aimed to assess the diagnostic yield and clinical impact of continuous arrhythmia monitoring (CAM) in patients with arrhythmic myocarditis. Methods. We enrolled consecutive adult patients (<i>n</i> = 104; 71% males, age 47 ± 11 year, mean LVEF 50 ± 13%) with biopsy-proven active myocarditis and de novo ventricular arrhythmias (VAs). All patients underwent prospective monitoring by both sequential 24-h Holter ECGs and CAM, including either ICD (<i>n</i> = 62; 60%) or loop recorder (<i>n</i> = 42; 40%). Results. By 3.7 ± 1.6 year follow up, 45 patients (43%) had VT, 67 (64%) NSVT and 102 (98%) premature ventricular complexes (PVC). As compared to the Holter ECG (average 9.5 exams per patient), CAM identified more patients with VA (VT: 45 vs. 4; NSVT: 64 vs. 45; both <i>p</i> < 0.001), more VA episodes (VT: 100 vs. 4%; NSVT: 91 vs. 12%) and earlier NSVT timing (median 6 vs. 24 months, <i>p</i> < 0.001). The extensive ICD implantation strategy was proven beneficial in 80% of the population. Histological signs of chronically active myocarditis (<i>n</i> = 73, 70%) and anteroseptal late gadolinium enhancement (<i>n</i> = 26, 25%) were significantly associated with the occurrence of VTs during follow up, even in the primary prevention subgroup. Conclusion. In patients with arrhythmic myocarditis, CAM allowed accurate arrhythmia detection and showed a considerable clinical impact.Giovanni PerettoPatrizio MazzoneGabriele PaglinoAlessandra MarziGeorgios TsitsinakisStefania RizzoCristina BassoPaolo Della BellaSimone SalaMDPI AGarticlemyocarditisarrhythmiastelemonitoringimplantable cardioverter defibrillatorimplantable loop recorderHolter ECGMedicineRENJournal of Clinical Medicine, Vol 10, Iss 5142, p 5142 (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic myocarditis
arrhythmias
telemonitoring
implantable cardioverter defibrillator
implantable loop recorder
Holter ECG
Medicine
R
spellingShingle myocarditis
arrhythmias
telemonitoring
implantable cardioverter defibrillator
implantable loop recorder
Holter ECG
Medicine
R
Giovanni Peretto
Patrizio Mazzone
Gabriele Paglino
Alessandra Marzi
Georgios Tsitsinakis
Stefania Rizzo
Cristina Basso
Paolo Della Bella
Simone Sala
Continuous Electrical Monitoring in Patients with Arrhythmic Myocarditis: Insights from a Referral Center
description Background. The incidence and burden of arrhythmias in myocarditis are under-reported. Objective. We aimed to assess the diagnostic yield and clinical impact of continuous arrhythmia monitoring (CAM) in patients with arrhythmic myocarditis. Methods. We enrolled consecutive adult patients (<i>n</i> = 104; 71% males, age 47 ± 11 year, mean LVEF 50 ± 13%) with biopsy-proven active myocarditis and de novo ventricular arrhythmias (VAs). All patients underwent prospective monitoring by both sequential 24-h Holter ECGs and CAM, including either ICD (<i>n</i> = 62; 60%) or loop recorder (<i>n</i> = 42; 40%). Results. By 3.7 ± 1.6 year follow up, 45 patients (43%) had VT, 67 (64%) NSVT and 102 (98%) premature ventricular complexes (PVC). As compared to the Holter ECG (average 9.5 exams per patient), CAM identified more patients with VA (VT: 45 vs. 4; NSVT: 64 vs. 45; both <i>p</i> < 0.001), more VA episodes (VT: 100 vs. 4%; NSVT: 91 vs. 12%) and earlier NSVT timing (median 6 vs. 24 months, <i>p</i> < 0.001). The extensive ICD implantation strategy was proven beneficial in 80% of the population. Histological signs of chronically active myocarditis (<i>n</i> = 73, 70%) and anteroseptal late gadolinium enhancement (<i>n</i> = 26, 25%) were significantly associated with the occurrence of VTs during follow up, even in the primary prevention subgroup. Conclusion. In patients with arrhythmic myocarditis, CAM allowed accurate arrhythmia detection and showed a considerable clinical impact.
format article
author Giovanni Peretto
Patrizio Mazzone
Gabriele Paglino
Alessandra Marzi
Georgios Tsitsinakis
Stefania Rizzo
Cristina Basso
Paolo Della Bella
Simone Sala
author_facet Giovanni Peretto
Patrizio Mazzone
Gabriele Paglino
Alessandra Marzi
Georgios Tsitsinakis
Stefania Rizzo
Cristina Basso
Paolo Della Bella
Simone Sala
author_sort Giovanni Peretto
title Continuous Electrical Monitoring in Patients with Arrhythmic Myocarditis: Insights from a Referral Center
title_short Continuous Electrical Monitoring in Patients with Arrhythmic Myocarditis: Insights from a Referral Center
title_full Continuous Electrical Monitoring in Patients with Arrhythmic Myocarditis: Insights from a Referral Center
title_fullStr Continuous Electrical Monitoring in Patients with Arrhythmic Myocarditis: Insights from a Referral Center
title_full_unstemmed Continuous Electrical Monitoring in Patients with Arrhythmic Myocarditis: Insights from a Referral Center
title_sort continuous electrical monitoring in patients with arrhythmic myocarditis: insights from a referral center
publisher MDPI AG
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/05fada0fdce049a0a8d42f4f8d28171b
work_keys_str_mv AT giovanniperetto continuouselectricalmonitoringinpatientswitharrhythmicmyocarditisinsightsfromareferralcenter
AT patriziomazzone continuouselectricalmonitoringinpatientswitharrhythmicmyocarditisinsightsfromareferralcenter
AT gabrielepaglino continuouselectricalmonitoringinpatientswitharrhythmicmyocarditisinsightsfromareferralcenter
AT alessandramarzi continuouselectricalmonitoringinpatientswitharrhythmicmyocarditisinsightsfromareferralcenter
AT georgiostsitsinakis continuouselectricalmonitoringinpatientswitharrhythmicmyocarditisinsightsfromareferralcenter
AT stefaniarizzo continuouselectricalmonitoringinpatientswitharrhythmicmyocarditisinsightsfromareferralcenter
AT cristinabasso continuouselectricalmonitoringinpatientswitharrhythmicmyocarditisinsightsfromareferralcenter
AT paolodellabella continuouselectricalmonitoringinpatientswitharrhythmicmyocarditisinsightsfromareferralcenter
AT simonesala continuouselectricalmonitoringinpatientswitharrhythmicmyocarditisinsightsfromareferralcenter
_version_ 1718431982776483840