A Joint Quality Improvement and High-Value Care Curriculum in a Limited-Resource Setting

Introduction Since the release of the Institute of Medicine's To Err Is Human, there has been an increased focus on quality improvement (QI). QI training is now a requirement monitored via ACGME's clinical learning environment review committees. Given the significant cost of health care wa...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Anne Cioletti, Suzanne Sweidan
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Association of American Medical Colleges 2017
Materias:
L
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/0618b63a97db488199335cfcc9de1e02
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
Descripción
Sumario:Introduction Since the release of the Institute of Medicine's To Err Is Human, there has been an increased focus on quality improvement (QI). QI training is now a requirement monitored via ACGME's clinical learning environment review committees. Given the significant cost of health care waste, teaching physicians to incorporate costs and value into medical decision making is crucial. Increasing information is available on methods to teach high-value care (HVC), but there is little information on combining HVC with QI. As these topics are intimately linked in efforts to provide effective, efficient care, a joint curriculum is a feasible solution. Methods We adapted material from two online resources—(1) Institute of Healthcare Improvement Open School and (2) American College of Physicians High Value Cost-Conscious Care Curriculum—to create a combined curriculum for use in a limited-resource setting. Our curriculum is divided into 10 seminars, each including both QI techniques and HVC theories, which are reinforced using a series of patient scenarios. Residents apply their knowledge in self-directed projects presented in the final seminar. Evaluation includes a pre-/postexposure QI knowledge application test, survey of self-assessed knowledge, and anonymous course feedback. Results For the 46 residents who completed the series, a statistically significant improvement in both tests was measured, and feedback was positive overall. Tailoring our in-seminar patient scenarios allowed residents to demonstrate their HVC knowledge acquisition. Discussion This seminar-based curriculum can be adapted to the time availability in any residency program and transfer to other disciplines with modification of the patient scenarios.