Evidence of past and current collaborations between traditional health practitioners and biomedical health practitioners: a scoping review protocol

Introduction Healthcare seekers around the globe use more than one healthcare system, with most using the traditional and the Western approaches concurrently. To date, little collaboration between the two systems has taken place within the mental health space compared with other areas of medicine. I...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales:	Ngcwalisa Amanda Jama, Anam Nyembezi, Uta Lehmann
Formato:	article
Lenguaje:	EN
Publicado:	BMJ Publishing Group 2021
Materias:	Medicine R
Acceso en línea:	https://doaj.org/article/064fdde392cc494cb72079e8b1298f55
Etiquetas:	Agregar Etiqueta Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!

id	oai:doaj.org-article:064fdde392cc494cb72079e8b1298f55
record_format	dspace
spelling	oai:doaj.org-article:064fdde392cc494cb72079e8b1298f552021-11-19T16:00:05ZEvidence of past and current collaborations between traditional health practitioners and biomedical health practitioners: a scoping review protocol10.1136/bmjopen-2020-0434522044-6055https://doaj.org/article/064fdde392cc494cb72079e8b1298f552021-01-01T00:00:00Zhttps://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/11/1/e043452.fullhttps://doaj.org/toc/2044-6055Introduction Healthcare seekers around the globe use more than one healthcare system, with most using the traditional and the Western approaches concurrently. To date, little collaboration between the two systems has taken place within the mental health space compared with other areas of medicine. In order to inform integrating plans for traditional health practitioners and biomedical health practitioners in the South African mental health system, it is important to know which models of collaboration are used in other medical settings and contexts. This study aims to document global evidence on collaboration practices between traditional health practitioners and biomedical professionals when working with various health conditions.Methods and analysis This scoping review will be guided by an improved Arksey and O’Malley framework, the 2010 Levac et al methodological framework and the 2017 Joanna Briggs Institute guidelines. A systematic literature search will be carried out using seven different databases, EMBASE, PubMed, LILACS MEDLINE, APA PsycArticles, CINAHL Plus, Academic Search Complete and Scopus, in addition to the WHO repository, bibliographical search engines, and Open Access Theses and Dissertations. Moreover, the references of relevant publications between January 1978 and March 2020 will be scanned. Two reviewers will independently screen articles for eligibility based on the predetermined inclusion and exclusion criteria. Thematic analysis and descriptive numerical analysis will be performed using ATLAS.ti V.8 and Excel software, respectively. The results for this review will be presented using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis: Extension for Scoping Review.Ethics and dissemination This study will not require ethics approval because publicly available material will be used. Study findings will be published in an open-access journal and be presented to other key health system stakeholders and academic research gatherings.Ngcwalisa Amanda JamaAnam NyembeziUta LehmannBMJ Publishing GrouparticleMedicineRENBMJ Open, Vol 11, Iss 1 (2021)
institution	DOAJ
collection	DOAJ
language	EN
topic	Medicine R
spellingShingle	Medicine R Ngcwalisa Amanda Jama Anam Nyembezi Uta Lehmann Evidence of past and current collaborations between traditional health practitioners and biomedical health practitioners: a scoping review protocol
description	Introduction Healthcare seekers around the globe use more than one healthcare system, with most using the traditional and the Western approaches concurrently. To date, little collaboration between the two systems has taken place within the mental health space compared with other areas of medicine. In order to inform integrating plans for traditional health practitioners and biomedical health practitioners in the South African mental health system, it is important to know which models of collaboration are used in other medical settings and contexts. This study aims to document global evidence on collaboration practices between traditional health practitioners and biomedical professionals when working with various health conditions.Methods and analysis This scoping review will be guided by an improved Arksey and O’Malley framework, the 2010 Levac et al methodological framework and the 2017 Joanna Briggs Institute guidelines. A systematic literature search will be carried out using seven different databases, EMBASE, PubMed, LILACS MEDLINE, APA PsycArticles, CINAHL Plus, Academic Search Complete and Scopus, in addition to the WHO repository, bibliographical search engines, and Open Access Theses and Dissertations. Moreover, the references of relevant publications between January 1978 and March 2020 will be scanned. Two reviewers will independently screen articles for eligibility based on the predetermined inclusion and exclusion criteria. Thematic analysis and descriptive numerical analysis will be performed using ATLAS.ti V.8 and Excel software, respectively. The results for this review will be presented using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis: Extension for Scoping Review.Ethics and dissemination This study will not require ethics approval because publicly available material will be used. Study findings will be published in an open-access journal and be presented to other key health system stakeholders and academic research gatherings.
format	article
author	Ngcwalisa Amanda Jama Anam Nyembezi Uta Lehmann
author_facet	Ngcwalisa Amanda Jama Anam Nyembezi Uta Lehmann
author_sort	Ngcwalisa Amanda Jama
title	Evidence of past and current collaborations between traditional health practitioners and biomedical health practitioners: a scoping review protocol
title_short	Evidence of past and current collaborations between traditional health practitioners and biomedical health practitioners: a scoping review protocol
title_full	Evidence of past and current collaborations between traditional health practitioners and biomedical health practitioners: a scoping review protocol
title_fullStr	Evidence of past and current collaborations between traditional health practitioners and biomedical health practitioners: a scoping review protocol
title_full_unstemmed	Evidence of past and current collaborations between traditional health practitioners and biomedical health practitioners: a scoping review protocol
title_sort	evidence of past and current collaborations between traditional health practitioners and biomedical health practitioners: a scoping review protocol
publisher	BMJ Publishing Group
publishDate	2021
url	https://doaj.org/article/064fdde392cc494cb72079e8b1298f55
work_keys_str_mv	AT ngcwalisaamandajama evidenceofpastandcurrentcollaborationsbetweentraditionalhealthpractitionersandbiomedicalhealthpractitionersascopingreviewprotocol AT anamnyembezi evidenceofpastandcurrentcollaborationsbetweentraditionalhealthpractitionersandbiomedicalhealthpractitionersascopingreviewprotocol AT utalehmann evidenceofpastandcurrentcollaborationsbetweentraditionalhealthpractitionersandbiomedicalhealthpractitionersascopingreviewprotocol
_version_	1718419993418268672

Evidence of past and current collaborations between traditional health practitioners and biomedical health practitioners: a scoping review protocol

Ejemplares similares