EFFECTIVENESS OF EX-PRESS AND AHMED DRAINAGE DEVICES IN PATIENTS WITH SECONDARY NEOVASCULAR GLAUCOMA
The purpose of the study was to compare the efficacy of Ex-Press and Ahmed drainage devices for the secondary neo-vascular glaucoma (NVG) in patients with diabetes mellitus. We observed 25 patients (25 eyes) with secondary NVG in the setting of proliferative diabetic retinopathy. The first group con...
Guardado en:
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | article |
Lenguaje: | RU |
Publicado: |
Scientific Сentre for Family Health and Human Reproduction Problems
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://doaj.org/article/0679090a6fa24248a758f3ab009d935c |
Etiquetas: |
Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
|
Sumario: | The purpose of the study was to compare the efficacy of Ex-Press and Ahmed drainage devices for the secondary neo-vascular glaucoma (NVG) in patients with diabetes mellitus. We observed 25 patients (25 eyes) with secondary NVG in the setting of proliferative diabetic retinopathy. The first group consisted of 10 patients (10 eyes) who underwent Ex-Press drainage implantation. The second group consisted of 15 patients (15 eyes) who were implanted Ahmed valve FP7 model. As a result the maximum value of 1OP in the analyzed groups decreased by 66.8 % and 64.2 % respectively immediately after the surgery. By the end of 18 months follow-up period, the absolute hypotensive effect in patients of group 1 was 20 % (2/10) whereas in group 2 - 60 % (9/15). Normal intraocular tension during treatment with glaucoma medications established in 30 % of cases in group 1 (3/10) and in 80 % of patients in group 2 (12/15). Thus, the use of Ex-Press drainage device for secondary NVG in patients with diabetes was ineffective in 70 % of cases. We can recommend choosing implantation of Ahmed valve for secondary NVG in patients with diabetes mellitus as the number of unsuccessful outcomes using Ahmed valve was observed only in 20 % of cases. |
---|